JB/058/238/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/238/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/238/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/238/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/238/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->12 April 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>Of the natural system, as above described <del>to develop</del><lb/>
 
of the natural system considered with reference to the main end of justice, Right <add>Rectitude of
 
decisions – to develop</add> the features of <del>delay</del> detail will be the business of the present<lb/>
work and of the present book.  To contrast with it the corresponding<lb/>
features of the technical system in relation to the<lb/>
same points <add>end</add> will also be the <del><gap/></del> business <add>be the further business</add> of the present work<lb/>
and of the present book:  for as, <add>in so far as the question of fact is concerned</add> right decision <del>is the natural<lb/>
fruit of</del> as far as human frailty permitts is the natural<lb/>
fruit of a rational <add>set of arrangements</add> arrangement <add>system</add> in relation to the law of<lb/>
evidence, so <add>on the other hand</add> is <hi rend="underline">misdecision</hi> the natural result of an irrational<lb/>
one.</p>
<p>To exhibit <add>delineate</add> a view of the natural system in any<lb/>
ulterior point of view – to delineate <add>exhibit represent</add> it in its application to<lb/>
the collateral ends of justice – avoidance of delay, vexation,<lb/> and expence does not fall within the design <add>either</add> of the present<lb/>
book or of the present work, any <del><gap/></del> further than for the<lb/>
<add>compleat</add> full exhibition of it in the main point of view, the <del>occasional</del> <add>partial</add><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> exhibition of it in that collateral point of view may<lb/>
occasionally be necessary.</p>
<p>To exhibit the technical system professedly in this<lb/>
collateral point of view will for the same reason be beside<lb/>
the purpose of the present work as well as of the present book:<lb/>
at the same time so intimately <add>blended</add> are the several objects corresponding<lb/>
to the several ends of justice, that <del>the partial exhibition of the</del> <add>an</add><lb/>
occasional reference to the topics of delay, vexation and expence<lb/>
and with it a partial delineation <add>exhibition</add> of the way in which those<lb/>
inconveniences have been produced by <add>grown out of</add> the technical system will<lb/>
every now and then be inevitable.</p>
<p>To instance the topic of exclusion.  <del>For</del> To the prevention of misdecision<lb/>
exclusion of evidence, it will be shewn can not in any case be conducive:  but with<lb/>
relation to the prevention of a preponderant measure of delay<lb/>
vexation and expence, it will in many cases be not only<lb/>
conducive, but even eligible upon the whole, eligible and<lb/>
even <del>unavoidable</del> to such a degree as to be unavoidable.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:16, 26 July 2022

Click Here To Edit

12 April 1805
Evidence

Of the natural system, as above described to develop
of the natural system considered with reference to the main end of justice, Right Rectitude of decisions – to develop the features of delay detail will be the business of the present
work and of the present book. To contrast with it the corresponding
features of the technical system in relation to the
same points end will also be the business be the further business of the present work
and of the present book: for as, in so far as the question of fact is concerned right decision is the natural
fruit of
as far as human frailty permitts is the natural
fruit of a rational set of arrangements arrangement system in relation to the law of
evidence, so on the other hand is misdecision the natural result of an irrational
one.

To exhibit delineate a view of the natural system in any
ulterior point of view – to delineate exhibit represent it in its application to
the collateral ends of justice – avoidance of delay, vexation,
and expence does not fall within the design either of the present
book or of the present work, any further than for the
compleat full exhibition of it in the main point of view, the occasional partial
exhibition of it in that collateral point of view may
occasionally be necessary.

To exhibit the technical system professedly in this
collateral point of view will for the same reason be beside
the purpose of the present work as well as of the present book:
at the same time so intimately blended are the several objects corresponding
to the several ends of justice, that the partial exhibition of the an
occasional reference to the topics of delay, vexation and expence
and with it a partial delineation exhibition of the way in which those
inconveniences have been produced by grown out of the technical system will
every now and then be inevitable.

To instance the topic of exclusion. For To the prevention of misdecision
exclusion of evidence, it will be shewn can not in any case be conducive: but with
relation to the prevention of a preponderant measure of delay
vexation and expence, it will in many cases be not only
conducive, but even eligible upon the whole, eligible and
even unavoidable to such a degree as to be unavoidable.


Identifier: | JB/058/238/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-04-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

8

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

238

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18907

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in