JB/042/245/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/245/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
Constitutional Law</head>
Constitutional Law</head>


<note>2o<lb/>
<note>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/>
Ch. IX. Minister<lb/>
Ch. IX. <unclear>Minister</unclear><lb/>
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/>
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/>
First Number in for Judicially an Office</note>
<unclear>First Number in for Judicially</unclear> <add>an Office</add></note>


<p>7</p>
<p>7</p>


<!-- The remainder of the page is deleted -->
<!-- The remainder of the page is deleted -->
<p>Taking in hand the French and English systems <gap/><lb/>
<p>Taking in hand the French and English systems <del><gap/></del><lb/>
upon the supposition of the correctness of the opening know above determined advanced,<lb/>
upon the supposition of the correctness of the opening <add>known</add> above <add><unclear>determined</unclear></add> advanced,<lb/>
can a a very slight and general acquisition <gap/> this would enable<lb/>
can a <add>a very</add> slight <add>and general</add> acquisition <del><gap/></del> this would enable<lb/>
any man to afford a strong and instructive<lb/>
any man to afford a strong and <unclear>instructive</unclear><lb/>
illustration of them</p>
illustration of them</p>


<p>In the French system, he will see error and one<lb/>
<p>In the French system, he will see error and an<lb/>
seating: error in principle, enacting in the application.</p>
<unclear>seating</unclear>: error in principle, enacting in the application.</p>


<p>In the English he will see throughout the above<lb/>
<p>In the English he will see throughout the <unclear>above</unclear><lb/>
of all principle, the <gap/> gr<gap/> in<gap/>, and in the<lb/>
of all principle, the <del><gap/></del> gr<gap/> in<gap/>, and in the<lb/>
result of at the th<gap/> confusion throughout the whole of its<lb/>
result of at the thickest confusion throughout the whole of its<lb/>
texture.</p>
texture.</p>


<p>In the French system suits being classed according to the<lb/>
<p>In the French system suits being classed according to the<lb/>
supposed <gap/> of the con<gap/> he will observe allotted<lb/>
supposed <unclear>order of the importance</unclear> he will observe allotted<lb/>
to those to which the least importance is <gap/>, single-<lb/>
to those to which the least importance is <gap/>, single-<lb/>
seated j<gap/>: to those to which the highest degree of importance<lb/>
seated <unclear>justices</unclear>: to those to which the highest degree of importance<lb/>
is ascribed the greatest number of Judges: and not as to expense only<lb/>
is ascribed the greatest number of Judges: and not <add>as to expense</add> only<lb/>
the greatest number of Judges but to such of them the highest<lb/>
the greatest number of Judges but to such of them the highest<lb/>
rule of r<gap/></p>
<unclear>rate of remuneration</unclear></p>





Revision as of 08:57, 27 July 2022

Click Here To Edit

1825 Nov. 7
Constitutional Law

2o
Ch. IX. Minister
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
First Number in for Judicially an Office

7

Taking in hand the French and English systems
upon the supposition of the correctness of the opening known above determined advanced,
can a a very slight and general acquisition this would enable
any man to afford a strong and instructive
illustration of them

In the French system, he will see error and an
seating: error in principle, enacting in the application.

In the English he will see throughout the above
of all principle, the gr in, and in the
result of at the thickest confusion throughout the whole of its
texture.

In the French system suits being classed according to the
supposed order of the importance he will observe allotted
to those to which the least importance is , single-
seated justices: to those to which the highest degree of importance
is ascribed the greatest number of Judges: and not as to expense only
the greatest number of Judges but to such of them the highest
rate of remuneration




Identifier: | JB/042/245/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-11-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

15-19

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

245

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

13168

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in