★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1825. | <head>1825. <del>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi>.</del> March 13<lb/> | ||
Constitutional Code</head> | Constitutional Code</head> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<p>2</p> | <p>2</p> | ||
<p>By this circumstance in conjunction with another others, the<lb/> | <p>By this circumstance in conjunction with another <add>others</add>, the<lb/> | ||
number of the Judicatories is determined. But for the consideration<lb/> | number of the Judicatories is determined. But for the consideration<lb/> | ||
of the expence, | of the <sic>expence</sic>, this number could not be too great, it<lb/> | ||
being assumed that for this purpose their local fields of jurisdiction<lb/> | being assumed that for this purpose their local fields of <unclear>jurisdiction</unclear><lb/> | ||
shall be as equal as the difference between degrees of populousness<lb/> | shall be as equal as the difference between degrees of populousness<lb/> | ||
and | <add>and</add> <add><unclear>physical</unclear></add> <add>means of communication</add> will <sic>admitt</sic>: for supposing in this case a <unclear>prudent</unclear><lb/> | ||
degree of approach to equality, the greater the number of the judicatories<lb/> | <del>degree of</del> <add>approach to</add> equality, the greater the number of the judicatories<lb/> | ||
the less will be the journey which that inhabitant whose habitation<lb/> | the less will be the journey which that inhabitant whose habitation<lb/> | ||
is most remote from the Justice Chamber will have to<lb/> | is most remote from the Justice Chamber will have to<lb/> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
<p>But unless not only the Judges themselves but those their<lb/> | <p>But unless not only the Judges themselves but those their<lb/> | ||
subordinates who must necessarily be attached to each | subordinates who must necessarily be attached to each <unclear>Judicatory</unclear><lb/> | ||
will all be content to all serve | <add>will all be content to</add> all serve <unclear>gratis</unclear> the greater the number of them the greater<lb/> | ||
will be the expence Here then is one reason which in conjunction<lb/> | will be the <sic>expence</sic> Here then is one reason which in conjunction<lb/> | ||
with others pleads for the reduction of the number in each<lb/> | with others pleads for the reduction of the number in each<lb/> | ||
judicatory to its minimum that is to say to one</p> | judicatory to its minimum that is to say to one</p> | ||
<p>Another reason is — that by every number added to one<lb/> | <p>Another reason is — that by every number added to one<lb/> | ||
the aptitude of the judicatory — the aptitude <gap/> in all its branches<lb/> | the aptitude of the judicatory — the aptitude <del><gap/></del> in all its branches<lb/> | ||
is | is <add><unclear>prodigiously</unclear></add> diminished. But of this afterwards</p> | ||
<p>For the same reason neither the local field of each<lb/> | <p>For the same reason <unclear>neither</unclear> the local field of each<lb/> | ||
judicatory, the logical field is made all-comprehensive. No<lb/> | judicatory, the logical field is made all-comprehensive. No<lb/> | ||
logical is metaphysical made and here of demarcation — one sort<lb/> | logical is metaphysical <unclear>made and here</unclear> of demarcation — one sort<lb/> | ||
of suit to one Judge or set of Judges another to another — and so<lb/> | of suit to one Judge or set of Judges another to another — and so<lb/> | ||
on. For suppose the to make local field suppose the logical field<lb/> | on. For <del>suppose the</del> to <unclear>make</unclear> local field suppose the logical field<lb/> | ||
divided into two parts, here must the number of Judicatories be<lb/> | divided into two parts, here must the number of Judicatories be<lb/> | ||
doubled: if into three parts trebled, and so on: and then the<lb/> | doubled: if into three parts trebled, and so on: and then the<lb/> | ||
expence doubled or trebled, | <sic>expence</sic> doubled or trebled, this on the supposition of but one Judge<lb/> | ||
in a < | in a <add><unclear>each</unclear></add> judicatory</p> | ||
<p>Suppose now two Judges in a judicatory. Then we have in<lb/> | <p>Suppose now two Judges in a judicatory. Then we have in<lb/> | ||
each local d<gap/> of its field five — and the expence quadrupled: if<lb/> | each local d<gap/> of its field five — and the expence quadrupled: if<lb/> | ||
three sextupled: and if to the supposition of three <gap/> d<gap/> of the logical<lb/> | three sextupled: and if to the supposition of three <del><gap/></del> d<gap/> of the logical<lb/> | ||
field, and three Judges | field, and three Judges in each <gap/> Judges then we have total of needful <note>and useful <sic>expences</sic><lb/> | ||
multiplied by 9.</note></p> | multiplied by 9.</note></p> | ||
1825. Jany. March 13
Constitutional Code
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.4. Judicatories their grades
§.5. Number in a Judicatory
§.6. Self-Suppletive function
English practice
2
By this circumstance in conjunction with another others, the
number of the Judicatories is determined. But for the consideration
of the expence, this number could not be too great, it
being assumed that for this purpose their local fields of jurisdiction
shall be as equal as the difference between degrees of populousness
and physical means of communication will admitt: for supposing in this case a prudent
degree of approach to equality, the greater the number of the judicatories
the less will be the journey which that inhabitant whose habitation
is most remote from the Justice Chamber will have to
make.
But unless not only the Judges themselves but those their
subordinates who must necessarily be attached to each Judicatory
will all be content to all serve gratis the greater the number of them the greater
will be the expence Here then is one reason which in conjunction
with others pleads for the reduction of the number in each
judicatory to its minimum that is to say to one
Another reason is — that by every number added to one
the aptitude of the judicatory — the aptitude in all its branches
is prodigiously diminished. But of this afterwards
For the same reason neither the local field of each
judicatory, the logical field is made all-comprehensive. No
logical is metaphysical made and here of demarcation — one sort
of suit to one Judge or set of Judges another to another — and so
on. For suppose the to make local field suppose the logical field
divided into two parts, here must the number of Judicatories be
doubled: if into three parts trebled, and so on: and then the
expence doubled or trebled, this on the supposition of but one Judge
in a each judicatory
Suppose now two Judges in a judicatory. Then we have in
each local d of its field five — and the expence quadrupled: if
three sextupled: and if to the supposition of three d of the logical
field, and three Judges in each Judges then we have total of needful and useful expences
multiplied by 9.
|
Identifier: | JB/042/247/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-03-13 |
|||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
247 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
13170 |
|||
