★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/015/058/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/015/058/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/015/058/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->28 June 1816<lb/> | |||
<head>Polit. Deontology</head></p> | |||
<p>Wil it be under Utility as above explained, or in other<lb/> | |||
words happiness as though it be on the largest scale ought<lb/> | |||
not on this occasion to be taken for the <del><gap/></del> principal standard<lb/> | |||
– is at any rate not for the sole standard. <del>Justice has</del><lb/> | |||
Equal or more superior to <hi rend="underline">utility</hi> justice has its claims.</p> | |||
<p>To this there are two answers.</p> | |||
<p>1. The first is – that but in virtue <add>by with measure</add> of its reference to <del>at</del><lb/> | |||
its subservience to utility i.e. to happiness <hi rend="underline">justice</hi> the<lb/> | |||
thing meant by <hi rend="underline">justice</hi> has no virtue: <del>were the to</del> no, nor<lb/> | |||
the word justice <del><gap/></del> any intelligible signification. <add>And</add> But for<lb/> | |||
this see further on.</p> | |||
<p>2. The other is – that even supposing that to the exclusion<lb/> | |||
or in preference is in coordination with utility justice<lb/> | |||
be assumed for the standard or propriety, it will even be<lb/> | |||
the same thing: for it <add>it be</add> justice that is to regulate the distribution<lb/> | |||
of happiness in a community of individuals at<lb/> | |||
what number short of the whole <del><gap/></del> can you find any<lb/> | |||
reason for dipping?</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} | ||
28 June 1816
Polit. Deontology
Wil it be under Utility as above explained, or in other
words happiness as though it be on the largest scale ought
not on this occasion to be taken for the principal standard
– is at any rate not for the sole standard. Justice has
Equal or more superior to utility justice has its claims.
To this there are two answers.
1. The first is – that but in virtue by with measure of its reference to at
its subservience to utility i.e. to happiness justice the
thing meant by justice has no virtue: were the to no, nor
the word justice any intelligible signification. And But for
this see further on.
2. The other is – that even supposing that to the exclusion
or in preference is in coordination with utility justice
be assumed for the standard or propriety, it will even be
the same thing: for it it be justice that is to regulate the distribution
of happiness in a community of individuals at
what number short of the whole can you find any
reason for dipping?
|
Identifier: | JB/015/058/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1816-06-28 |
|||
|
015 |
deontology |
||
|
058 |
polit. deontology |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
john dickinson & c<…> 1813 |
||
|
a. levy |
|||
|
1813 |
|||
|
5274 |
|||
