★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1826. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 20<lb/>Review of Humphreys</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>L<lb/><note>§§, Observations miscellaneous</note><lb/>(1) <note>§ Genealogical Succession<lb/>Partition or non-partition!</note></p> <p><note>Objection to equal<lb/>partition</note></p> <p>To the system of equal partition the danger of destruction<lb/>in value by reduction to un<gap/>able parts <add><gap/></add> <del>were</del> in <add>the</add> objective<lb/>opposed by <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> H. was the <del><gap/></del> fear of a peremptory one<lb/>and of one in the comparatively consensual system of procedure<lb/>which ahs place in French law would begore the decree <gap/><lb/>at an end suffer to cut up the value, how much easier would<lb/>it <gap/> be <gap/> up by the exactly English on which is several<lb/>times as extensive?</p> <p>Answer. Before it arrived at this length <del>the</del> consequence<lb/><del>would be</del> individual interest operative in the strongest degree would<lb/>stop it: no price but here and there a madman would profer<lb/>its <gap/></del> made a <gap/> of the whole order here as among<lb/>the rest. No. it would come under the <gap/>: and is<lb/>expected and thence bidders would be so much more unseen<lb/>are here than in France, the <gap/> to give that distinction<lb?>to it would so <gap/> the earlier <gap/> <gap/> act.</p> <p>Then as to <sic>expence</sic> of procedure, so long as it <gap/><lb/>it might be a fatal one: but as the lawyer class though be<lb/>so much a <gap/> strong as is <gap/> the strongest the <gap/><lb/> and <gap/> length being still stronger, <del>the the <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>a degree of <gap/> in the <sic>expence</sic> still <gap/> that which<lb/>has place in <gap/> is in the nature of the case and would<lb/>be <gap/> into effect.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1826. Octr. 20
Review of Humphreys
L
§§, Observations miscellaneous
(1) § Genealogical Succession
Partition or non-partition!
Objection to equal
partition
To the system of equal partition the danger of destruction
in value by reduction to unable parts were in the objective
opposed by Mr. H. was the fear of a peremptory one
and of one in the comparatively consensual system of procedure
which ahs place in French law would begore the decree
at an end suffer to cut up the value, how much easier would
it be up by the exactly English on which is several
times as extensive?
Answer. Before it arrived at this length the consequence
would be individual interest operative in the strongest degree would
stop it: no price but here and there a madman would profer
its made a of the whole order here as among
the rest. No. it would come under the : and is
expected and thence bidders would be so much more unseen
are here than in France, the to give that distinction<lb?>to it would so the earlier act.
Then as to expence of procedure, so long as it
it might be a fatal one: but as the lawyer class though be
so much a strong as is the strongest the
and length being still stronger, the the
a degree of in the expence still that which
has place in is in the nature of the case and would
be into effect.
|
Identifier: | JB/078/117/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1826-10-20 |
Not numbered |
||
|
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
|
117 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
C1 |
||
|
25208 |
|||
