JB/054/158/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/054/158/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/158/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/158/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><note>&sect;.  By the Judge who extracted<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
the vivâ voce evidence<lb/>
 
should the immediate<lb/>
 
decrees, <del>of</del> <add>in what so far as</add> possible, be<lb/>
 
pronounced.</note></p>
<p>In that stage of society in which the art of reading<lb/>
is become to a <add>more or less</add> certain degree extensively <gap/> <add>in use</add> that art<lb/>
<add>by</add> the production of which adding <gap/>, be the sense of <unclear>seeing</unclear><lb/>
the assistance <add>help</add> which <gap/> of <unclear>desire</unclear> is capable of drawing<lb/>
from the sense of seeing has <del>become</del> not been sufficiently put<lb/>
to use.  The light which the <unclear>demeanour</unclear> of a witness is capable<lb/>
of throwing upon the contents of his mind <add>his thoughts</add> and thence upon<lb/>
the import of the words <del>he <gap/></del> by which he gives or pretends<lb/>
to give expression the <add><unclear>correct</unclear></add> <unclear>law</unclear> expresses to them, no man but<lb/>
must have had frequent opportunities of observing.  If the<lb/>
rectitude of decision, and for that purpose, correct conception and<lb/>
judgment in relation to <gap/> facts had been <add>any</add> the real objects<lb/>
of judicature, no opportunity <add><unclear>coincidence</unclear></add> of <del>coll</del> <gap/> those lights could<lb/>
have been foregone by any Judge.  <del>But the actual</del> <add>Very different <unclear>however</unclear></add><lb/>
has every where been the actual end of judicature.  To extract<lb/>
money from suitors for the benefit <add>to the use</add> of the Judge and his confederates<lb/>
this has every where been the main object in so far as it depended<lb/>
upon Judges not to speak of their master.  To be able to pronounce<lb/>
on each individual occasion with the less obstruction such <unclear>decision</unclear><lb/>
as should be most conformable to his personal view <del><gap/></del> and<lb/>
interest in all its shapes, <unclear>his</unclear> has been the real object, the object<lb/>
next in importance.  By <del>separating the</del> <gap/> <add>allotting</add> to two different persons<lb/>
the two so naturally so intimately connected functions of collating<lb/>
the evidence and framing the naturally <unclear>appointed</unclear> decrees<lb/>
the <del><gap/></del> operation and the <gap/> upon the ground of that <add>same</add> evidence,<lb/>
both these <gap/> purposes were both of them accomplished at <add>by</add> the same <unclear>law</unclear> <add>means</add>.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 06:15, 19 August 2022

Click Here To Edit

§. By the Judge who extracted
the vivâ voce evidence
should the immediate
decrees, of in what so far as possible, be
pronounced.

In that stage of society in which the art of reading
is become to a more or less certain degree extensively in use that art
by the production of which adding , be the sense of seeing
the assistance help which of desire is capable of drawing
from the sense of seeing has become not been sufficiently put
to use. The light which the demeanour of a witness is capable
of throwing upon the contents of his mind his thoughts and thence upon
the import of the words he by which he gives or pretends
to give expression the correct law expresses to them, no man but
must have had frequent opportunities of observing. If the
rectitude of decision, and for that purpose, correct conception and
judgment in relation to facts had been any the real objects
of judicature, no opportunity coincidence of coll those lights could
have been foregone by any Judge. But the actual Very different however
has every where been the actual end of judicature. To extract
money from suitors for the benefit to the use of the Judge and his confederates
this has every where been the main object in so far as it depended
upon Judges not to speak of their master. To be able to pronounce
on each individual occasion with the less obstruction such decision
as should be most conformable to his personal view and
interest in all its shapes, his has been the real object, the object
next in importance. By separating the allotting to two different persons
the two so naturally so intimately connected functions of collating
the evidence and framing the naturally appointed decrees
the operation and the upon the ground of that same evidence,
both these purposes were both of them accomplished at by the same law means.


Identifier: | JB/054/158/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 54.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1

Box

054

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

158

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17677

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in