JB/051/059/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/059/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/051/059/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/059/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/059/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>9<lb/>
The license granted<lb/>
by public<lb/>
opinion in this<lb/>
respect does not<lb/>
do away the<lb/>
objection of unfitness<lb/>
p.10</p>
<p>10<lb/>
The merits displayed<lb/>
by French<lb/>
advocates in <add>the</add> legislative<lb/>
line disproves not the truth<lb/>
of these observations.<lb/>
p.10</p>
<p>11<lb/>
The habits of an<lb/>
advocate are<lb/>
not so </p>
<p>1<lb/>
<p>1<lb/>
If Advocates<lb/>
If Advocates<lb/>
Line 81: Line 59:
of a greater.  p.8</p>
of a greater.  p.8</p>
<pb/>
<pb/>
 
<p>9<lb/>
The license granted<lb/>
by public<lb/>
opinion in this<lb/>
respect does not<lb/>
do away the<lb/>
objection of unfitness<lb/>
p.10</p>
<p>10<lb/>
The merits displayed<lb/>
by French<lb/>
advocates in <add>the</add> legislative<lb/>
line disproves not the truth<lb/>
of these observations.<lb/>
p.10</p>
<p>11<lb/>
The habits of an<lb/>
advocate are<lb/>
not so <unclear>where</unclear><lb/>
a <unclear>share</unclear> in legislation<lb/>
as to the<lb/>
administration<lb/>
of justice.  p.11</p>
<p>12<lb/>
The character of<lb/>
the Judge ought<lb/>
to be and might<lb/>
be free from all<lb/>
art and management.<lb/>
p.12.</p>
<pb/>
<p>13<lb/>
When <add>men</add> mean to<lb/>
magnify the profession,<lb/>
they suppress<lb/>
half its<lb/>
business.  p.13</p>
<p>14<lb/>
Appeal to the<lb/>
<unclear>candid</unclear> in the profession<lb/>
for the<lb/>
truth of this<lb/>
picture.  p.14</p>
<p>15<lb/>
The exclusion<lb/>
of advocates will<lb/>
be the less to be<lb/>
complained of in<lb/>
France as they<lb/>
have never hitherto<lb/>
been admitted.<lb/>
p.15</p>
<p>16<lb/>
Advocates will<lb/>
not by this regulation<lb/>
be put<lb/>
in a worse situation<lb/>
than men<lb/>
at large, – only<lb/>
be kept from<lb/>
putting themselves<lb/>
in a much better.<lb/>
p.16.</p>
<pb/>
<p>The monopoly a<lb/>
cause of distress to<lb/>
the very people whom<lb/>
it appears to benefit:<lb/>
for being a regular<lb/>
profession<lb/>
when men in they<lb/>
not nailed to it,<lb/>
&amp; can not charge<lb/>
it for another without<lb/>
disgrace.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 06:56, 27 August 2022

Click Here To Edit

1
If Advocates
were not excluded
they would have
greatly the advantage
over
Judges-depute

& inferior Judges.
1. in point of
eloquence

2
2. as being at
liberty to go about
and canvass which
the Judge is disbarred
from by
his deputy & by
his oath. p.2

3
3. as being disposed
to pliancy
of character. p.3

4
Disadvantages
of those such a
compilation.
1. It would draw
off the best talents
and fortunes to the
order of Advocates.
p.3.


---page break---

5.
2. It would give
the advantage to
a class of men
whose habits render
them peculiarly
useful for the station
on several
accounts, viz:
1. Indifference to Hatred of improvement
p.4

6
2. Hatred of improvement Indifference to
justice. p.6

7
3. Predilection for
injustice. p.7.

8
The habit of defending
bad causes
is an evil which
can not be cured
but at the expence
of a greater. p.8


---page break---

9
The license granted
by public
opinion in this
respect does not
do away the
objection of unfitness
p.10

10
The merits displayed
by French
advocates in the legislative
line disproves not the truth
of these observations.
p.10

11
The habits of an
advocate are
not so where
a share in legislation
as to the
administration
of justice. p.11

12
The character of
the Judge ought
to be and might
be free from all
art and management.
p.12.


---page break---

13
When men mean to
magnify the profession,
they suppress
half its
business. p.13

14
Appeal to the
candid in the profession
for the
truth of this
picture. p.14

15
The exclusion
of advocates will
be the less to be
complained of in
France as they
have never hitherto
been admitted.
p.15

16
Advocates will
not by this regulation
be put
in a worse situation
than men
at large, – only
be kept from
putting themselves
in a much better.
p.16.


---page break---

The monopoly a
cause of distress to
the very people whom
it appears to benefit:
for being a regular
profession
when men in they
not nailed to it,
& can not charge
it for another without
disgrace.


Identifier: | JB/051/059/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-16

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

059

Info in main headings field

advocates contents

Image

001

Titles

addenda

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16224

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in