JB/081/162/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/081/162/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
WilsonC (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1829. May 14. ++<lb/>
 
Petitions<lb/>
 
3<lb/>
12<lb/>
Dispatch Court.<lb/>
<unclear>&sect;.19. Subsequential &amp;c</unclear><lb/>
&sect; 5. Procedure.</head>
<note>&#9758; Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 18. <unclear>Confront</unclear><lb/>
this with the Bill</note><lb/>
<note>8<lb/>
Elicitation <unclear>epistotorily</unclear></note>
<p>The <hi rend="underline">Epistolary</hi> made of elicitation <add>&#x2014;</add> shall it be included<lb/>
in the experiment? <add><hi rend="underline">Answer</hi>.</add> Before the experiment<lb/>
is at an end, and the Judicatory either perpetuated or<lb/>
suffered to expire, yes. Not however at the outset. <hi rend="underline">Reason</hi>,<lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">extra delay</hi> which would thus be necessitated.<lb/>
<del>If however</del> <add><hi rend="underline">Exception</hi>. If</add> in this or that suit, it <del>might be</del> <add>is found</add> capable of<lb/>
being employed without production of <add>any such</add> extra delay: <del>yes</del>:<lb/>
for then <del>would</del> <add>will</add> the reason cease. <del>as for</del> Example, the<lb/>
individual <add>is</add> confined by infirmity, or resident in Scotland,<lb/>
Ireland or France, and the Solicitor <del>making</del> <add>makes</add> himself<lb/>
responsible for the <add>timely</add> effectuation of the required intercourse.</p>
<note>9<lb/>
Authentication in<lb/>
foreign country</note>
<p>On this occasion, </p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 06:26, 31 August 2022

Click Here To Edit

1829. May 14. ++
Petitions
3
12
Dispatch Court.
§.19. Subsequential &c
§ 5. Procedure.
☞ Decr 18. Confront
this with the Bill

8
Elicitation epistotorily

The Epistolary made of elicitation shall it be included
in the experiment? Answer. Before the experiment
is at an end, and the Judicatory either perpetuated or
suffered to expire, yes. Not however at the outset. Reason,
the extra delay which would thus be necessitated.
If however Exception. If in this or that suit, it might be is found capable of
being employed without production of any such extra delay: yes:
for then would will the reason cease. as for Example, the
individual is confined by infirmity, or resident in Scotland,
Ireland or France, and the Solicitor making makes himself
responsible for the timely effectuation of the required intercourse.

9
Authentication in
foreign country

On this occasion,



Identifier: | JB/081/162/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-05-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

8-10

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

162

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3 / e12 / f45

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

1828

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

25949

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in