JB/078/091/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/078/091/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1826. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 19 +<lb/>Review of Humphreys</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note>&sect; Agenda</note><lb/>7</p> <p>For a noun substantive in the nominative case, not being of itself indicative<lb/>of any other part of speech will <gap/> has a necessary<lb/>connection &#x2014; necessary to the <sic>compleat</sic> designation of the idea meant<lb/>to be expressed by it, presents to the mind a <gap/> plan<lb/>on which it can repose at pleasure: can lay it down and<lb/>take it up again at pleasure, and occupy itself <add><gap/></add> at any<lb/>time with view of making it the subject of a logical <gap/><lb/> the subject of predication.</p> <p>This is more than in any one of the other cases can be<lb/>due.  before the <add>any in</add> logical <gap/> to which assent or dissent<lb/>can be attached is concluded, the mind finds itself turned<lb/>on to the conclusion of the sentence <add>frequently</add> without time sufficient for<lb/>giving adequate consideration of what is expressed<lb/>the attention is turned aside to the endeavour to get or keep<lb/>hold of the object of <add>the existence of</add> which in <del>strive</del> obscure intimation<lb/>is given without its being expressed.</p> <p><note>16<lb/>16. Subarticles excepted<lb/>include not in one article<lb/>two sentences so<lb/>unconnected as to be<lb/>understood  <add><gap/></add> each without<lb/>reference to the other.</note></p> <p><note>Reasons<lb/>1. By such conjunction<lb/>the <del<gap/></del> reader had<lb/>to consider the two <hi rend="underline">sentences</hi><lb/>as forming but one <hi rend="underline">proposition</hi><lb/>and to get at the supposed<lb/><gap/> point for the import<lb/>of the whole, <sic>turnes</sic> itself<lb/>over the former point <del>and<lb/><gap/></del> without giving to<lb/>it the <add>proper</add. separate consideration<lb/>and thus confuses itself.<lb/>2. <del>For</del> without the other<lb/>neither can be repeated<lb/>by numerical reference <add>nor</add><lb/><del>without <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>otherwise than by description<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --><del>and</del> <add>Thus is</add> the simplicity of the text of the Code <del><gap/></del> impaired.</p> <p>Subarticles excepted as above <gap/> include <add>in</add> under<lb/><del><gap/></del> and the same article propositions which, <add>for the being rightly understood</add> have no immediate<lb/>connection with each other: much <add>still</add> less any <del>such</del><lb/>to such a degree independent of each other as that by no<lb/>one of them the extent of any other is either enlarged or<lb/>narrowed.  When each <del>proposition</del> <add>article</add> exhibits a <sic>compleat</sic> and independent<lb/>whole, then, if, <add>at</add> any time, reason is seen for the repeat<lb/>of it, reference to the article by its number is sufficient.<lb/>Now suppose two <del>articles</del> <add><del>propositions</del> enactments</add> in such sort independent of each<lb/>other <del><gap/></del> as that there may be need of repeating one<lb/>of them and at the same time preserving the other, <del<gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> or<lb/>if one of them alone comes to be repeated, <del>the</del> neither of the whole<lb?><add>which</add> <del>numb</del><lb/><!-- continues in the margin -->which by its number<lb/>will not answer the purpose:<lb/>of the part intended<lb/>to be repeated<lb/>a verbal description<lb/>is necessary.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 10:00, 2 September 2022

Click Here To Edit

1826. Octr. 19 +
Review of Humphreys

§ Agenda
7

For a noun substantive in the nominative case, not being of itself indicative
of any other part of speech will has a necessary
connection — necessary to the compleat designation of the idea meant
to be expressed by it, presents to the mind a plan
on which it can repose at pleasure: can lay it down and
take it up again at pleasure, and occupy itself at any
time with view of making it the subject of a logical
the subject of predication.

This is more than in any one of the other cases can be
due. before the any in logical to which assent or dissent
can be attached is concluded, the mind finds itself turned
on to the conclusion of the sentence frequently without time sufficient for
giving adequate consideration of what is expressed
the attention is turned aside to the endeavour to get or keep
hold of the object of the existence of which in strive obscure intimation
is given without its being expressed.

16
16. Subarticles excepted
include not in one article
two sentences so
unconnected as to be
understood each without
reference to the other.

<note>Reasons
1. By such conjunction
the <del reader had
to consider the two sentences
as forming but one proposition
and to get at the supposed
point for the import
of the whole, turnes itself
over the former point and
without giving to
it the proper</add. separate consideration
and thus confuses itself.
2. For without the other
neither can be repeated
by numerical reference <add>nor

without otherwise than by description
and <add>Thus is
the simplicity of the text of the Code impaired.

Subarticles excepted as above include in under
and the same article propositions which, for the being rightly understood have no immediate
connection with each other: much still less any such
to such a degree independent of each other as that by no
one of them the extent of any other is either enlarged or
narrowed. When each proposition article exhibits a compleat and independent
whole, then, if, at any time, reason is seen for the repeat
of it, reference to the article by its number is sufficient.
Now suppose two articles propositions enactments in such sort independent of each
other as that there may be need of repeating one
of them and at the same time preserving the other, <del or
if one of them alone comes to be repeated, the neither of the whole<lb?>which numb
which by its number
will not answer the purpose:
of the part intended
to be repeated
a verbal description
is necessary.




Identifier: | JB/078/091/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-10-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

16

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

091

Info in main headings field

Review of Humphreys

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C7 / E7

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25182

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in