JB/042/311/001

Click Here To Edit

1826. Augt.

Constitutional Code Ch. XII Judiciary collectively
S.8. Function common to all
Judges
§. or 9. Elimination functions
Inoperation universalized why
Conestiation Courts
9
No reason why the
saving made there should
not be made under the
here proposed system

But were as to the saving of thought proper to be ide their same
no reason appears for supposing that under the here proposed system
it might not be made

Of the probability of such economy that any example
affords any strongly presana evidence. Serving in that way
only as are in a crowd - his influence then as more than functionary
- that influencing natural unclothed<add>unfortified</add> with any imperative and
coercive power would cut the same be equally made to render
that same service also standing advised by that
supremelyinviting attribution

10
Of the economy resulting
from proposed system
strong presumptive
evidence

But it will be and all their generous may their same two
reasons for supposing that there was a , who to this
work of generous superating ever gave the whole of his time
would on one done; another, or another; just as each
found most convenient

11
Though remuneration
given it is cut down to
the smallest portion the
each person will be
content to take

It so: and for that reason it is that on
the present plan remuneration is provided: although by the admission
of competition, in the case of this service under the reign of gord and or in the case
of service in all other shapes, this remuneration will be cut down
to the smallest portion which each person will be intent to take

12
Objection to smallness
of remunerative the
prodigious mass of
scientific information
required on the part
of the Judge

But, (or he may put of the question) says to , to in the case or what the gratuity
service in question was rendered by so many and by all of them
in gratuitous term the fieldto proof of service was comparatively narrow:
or the here proposed plan it is all but all comprehensive
Think then what For the due discharge of the important function, what
a prodigious mass method of scientific information in a judicial shape
is necessary; and of the few who would regard as able to undertake
it how much form must be those who being able qualified<add>apt</add> would
at the same time be willing to undertake it for any such small
remuneration as would remain after competition had done its office

Identifier: | JB/042/311/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1826-08	Marginal Summary Numbering	9-12
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	311	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e3
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1824
Marginals		Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1824
Notes public		ID Number	13234
Box Contents