JB/081/165/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/081/165/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
WilsonC (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1829. April 28. ++<lb/>
 
Petition <del>Supplement Suits in pendency.</del><lb/>
 
6<lb/>
15<lb/>
<del>Suits in pendency.</del> <add>Dispatch Court</add><lb/>
&sect; 5. Procedure <del>&sect;7 Procedure &amp;<lb/>
Dispatch Court.</del><lb/>
4<hi rend="superscript">8</hi></head>
<note>15<lb/>
This done <hi rend="underline">in effect</hi><lb/>
under existing system<lb/>
but <hi rend="underline">loosely</hi> not expressed<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">in terminis</hi></note>
<p>Nor is this any thing more than what is done<lb/>
<del>at least</del> <add>or at least endeavoured to be done,</add> and carried into effect under the existing<lb/>
system: sole difference this: <del>what</del> <add>that which</add> under the existing<lb/>
system is done, is done <add>no otherwise than</add> in the way of general and<lb/>
loose description, instead of being expressed <hi rend="underline">in</hi> <hi rend="underline">terminis</hi>.</p>
<note>16<lb/>
Analogy in Judiciary<lb/>
and legislative procedures</note>
<p>Behold in this case the analogy between the<lb/>
mode of proceeding in the <add>two</add> business<add>es</add> of Judicature<lb/>
<del>and the mode of proceeding in the business of</del><lb/>
<add>and</add> legislature. Brought in <add>here</add> by plaintiff <del>would</del><lb/>
<del>be</del> <add>is</add> the similitude of a Bill<del>:</del> say in one word a<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Quasi-Bill</hi>. Made by the Dependant a<lb/>
<del>mode</del> <add>motion</add> either for the throwing <del>it</del> out <add>of this same Quasi-Bill,</add> or for intro<del>ducing</del><lb/>
<add>the inserting</add> into the body of <add>it,</add> <del>the <gap/></del> in the character of our <hi rend="underline">amendment</hi>, a proposition <del>in words</del> <add>to an effect</add><lb/>
more or less different. All parties heard, by<lb/>
the Judge, subject <add>always</add> to eventual <del>extinction</del> <add>abrogation</add><lb/>
or alteration by the legislative authority <del>would</del> <add>is</add><lb/>
<del>be</del> given <add><del><gap/> <gap/></del> authority and legal force,</add> either to the <hi rend="underline">Quasi</hi>-<hi rend="underline">Bill</hi>, to the amendment,<lb/>
or <add>to</add> an amendment of his own, different<lb/>
from both.</p>
<p><add>As</add></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 05:11, 4 September 2022

Click Here To Edit

1829. April 28. ++
Petition Supplement Suits in pendency.
6
15
Suits in pendency. Dispatch Court
§ 5. Procedure §7 Procedure &
Dispatch Court.

48
15
This done in effect
under existing system
but loosely not expressed
in terminis

Nor is this any thing more than what is done
at least or at least endeavoured to be done, and carried into effect under the existing
system: sole difference this: what that which under the existing
system is done, is done no otherwise than in the way of general and
loose description, instead of being expressed in terminis.

16
Analogy in Judiciary
and legislative procedures

Behold in this case the analogy between the
mode of proceeding in the two businesses of Judicature
and the mode of proceeding in the business of
and legislature. Brought in here by plaintiff would
be is the similitude of a Bill: say in one word a
Quasi-Bill. Made by the Dependant a
mode motion either for the throwing it out of this same Quasi-Bill, or for introducing
the inserting into the body of it, the in the character of our amendment, a proposition in words to an effect
more or less different. All parties heard, by
the Judge, subject always to eventual extinction abrogation
or alteration by the legislative authority would is
be given authority and legal force, either to the Quasi-Bill, to the amendment,
or to an amendment of his own, different
from both.

As



Identifier: | JB/081/165/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-04-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

15-16

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

165

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c6 / e15 / e48

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

25952

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in