JB/549/277/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/549/277/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/549/277/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/277/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/277/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>177 odd or <del><gap/></del> 178 odd.<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
3)</p>
 
<p><head>Method of treating each head of Offence.</head><lb/>
 
<note>Ch.  <add>Form</add> Order</note></p>
 
<p><del>against individual</del> <add>which</add> applied to an act <del>which</del> <add>that</add> in its ordinary<lb/>
nature is an offence only against individuals<lb/>
render it an offence against the <hi rend="underline">Neighbourhood</hi>.  There are others<lb/>
which render it an offence against the <hi rend="underline">State</hi>.</p>
<p>9.  I shall state the punishment which according to<lb/>
the principles laid down seems competent to the<lb/>
offence:  in the first place under the circumstances <add>by</add> which<lb/>
<del>ordinarily</del> <add>it is</add> accomplished in ordinary:  in the next place<lb/>
under <del>the extenuating</del> <add>such</add> circumstances <add>of extenuation</add> as may have<lb/>
been found to belong to it:  lastly under such <del>aggravating</del><lb/>
circumstances of aggravation as do not transfer<lb/>
the <del>act</del> <add>offence</add> to a different denomination.</p>
<p>10.  I shall pass a few strictures on the <del>institutions</del><lb/>
errors which <add>the <unclear>law</unclear></add> to judge <add>of it</add> from the principles above laid<lb/>
down, <add>or Law-writers</add> may appear to have fallen into <del><gap/> institutions<lb/>
or what insufficient as commonly is often<lb/>
<gap/> made not very easy to distinguish from the<lb/>
other hand, which Lawyers have fallen into in their<lb/>
speculations</del> with relation to the head of offence<lb/>
in question:  the Law in its institutions;  <del>Lawyers</del> <add>Law-writers</add><lb/>
in their <add>positions</add> reasons or reflections.  These two articles<lb/>
must in regard to so much of the subject as is<lb/>
governed by Common Law must go hand in hand<lb/>
<del>since.  It were impracticable in every instance</del>  To separate<lb/>
them in every instance were impracticable:<lb/>
<del>for</del> since Common Law <del>is nothing more</del> <add>at best is but</add><lb/>
<del>than</del> the opinion of <add>certain</add> Lawyers, nothing is <del><gap/></del> <add>oftentimes</add> more<lb/>
<del>difficult</del> <add>impossible than</add> to determine <del><gap/> what</del> is good Law, or<lb/>
what is mere opinion.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 01:49, 15 September 2022

Click Here To Edit

177 odd or 178 odd.
3)

Method of treating each head of Offence.
Ch. Form Order

against individual which applied to an act which that in its ordinary
nature is an offence only against individuals
render it an offence against the Neighbourhood. There are others
which render it an offence against the State.

9. I shall state the punishment which according to
the principles laid down seems competent to the
offence: in the first place under the circumstances by which
ordinarily it is accomplished in ordinary: in the next place
under the extenuating such circumstances of extenuation as may have
been found to belong to it: lastly under such aggravating
circumstances of aggravation as do not transfer
the act offence to a different denomination.

10. I shall pass a few strictures on the institutions
errors which the law to judge of it from the principles above laid
down, or Law-writers may appear to have fallen into institutions
or what insufficient as commonly is often
made not very easy to distinguish from the
other hand, which Lawyers have fallen into in their
speculations
with relation to the head of offence
in question: the Law in its institutions; Lawyers Law-writers
in their positions reasons or reflections. These two articles
must in regard to so much of the subject as is
governed by Common Law must go hand in hand
since. It were impracticable in every instance To separate
them in every instance were impracticable:
for since Common Law is nothing more at best is but
than the opinion of certain Lawyers, nothing is oftentimes more
difficult impossible than to determine what is good Law, or
what is mere opinion.


Identifier: | JB/549/277/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 549.

Date_1

[[date_1::177[?]]]

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

549

Main Headings

Folio number

277

Info in main headings field

Penal Code. Method of treating each head of offence

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in