★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
invaders — <add>species of invasion: and upon what principle can it be justified &c</add> a disproportion so great, that <add>the inaccuracy laxity</add> in ordinary discourse <add>we</add> <del><gap/></del><lb/> | invaders — <add>species of invasion: and upon what principle can it be justified &c</add> a disproportion so great, that <add>the inaccuracy laxity</add> in ordinary discourse <add>we</add> <del><gap/></del><lb/> | ||
<del>do not mention</del> <add><del><gap/></del> speaking of the one</add> as <add>not</add> having no <add>any</add> punishment [at all] annexed to it? <add>at all</add><lb/> | <del>do not mention</del> <add><del><gap/></del> speaking of the one</add> as <add>not</add> having no <add>any</add> punishment [at all] annexed to it? <add>at all</add><lb/> | ||
Clearly from hence that the loss <add>to the proprietor</add> in the one case <del>to the proprietor,</del> can never<lb/> | |||
be otherwise than temporary, as the subject from the immobility of its<lb/> | |||
nature, must ever be forthcoming: whereas in the other in most <del><gap/></del> <add>instances</add><lb/> | |||
the subject once gone is lost for ever. a striking confirmation of<lb/> | |||
this is: that <del>when</del> <add>where</add> from the circumstances of the invasion and the <gap/><lb/> | |||
<del><add>at</add></del> [in this latter] case <del><add>the case of moveable property</add></del> the subject <add>or in default, that person [substructing] to make a satisfaction</add> is still forthcoming: the extraordinary<lb/> | |||
penalty is immediately removed and the same moderate one <add>adopted</add> as in the other<lb/> | |||
case is adopted. This is the case of a wrongful <del>possessi</del> taking of a<lb/> | |||
moveable possession on pretence of Title; <del>now</del> <add>whereon</add> to support that pretence <add>&</add><lb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
---page break---
DIVISION. All Laws Penal 9
it the worse for him him repent it would plunder every other man of cups who had them
so would every man in the like case plunder every man of land that had it — The proprietor
of Land House [in the one case] would be as universally affected as the proprietors
of Cups [in the other] - [Take away the respective Penalties - in
both cases the insecurity will be the same] — Whence then is comes arises the disproportion
so conspicuous between the penalties punishment annexed to the
invaders — species of invasion: and upon what principle can it be justified &c a disproportion so great, that the inaccuracy laxity in ordinary discourse we
do not mention speaking of the one as not having no any punishment [at all] annexed to it? at all
Clearly from hence that the loss to the proprietor in the one case to the proprietor, can never
be otherwise than temporary, as the subject from the immobility of its
nature, must ever be forthcoming: whereas in the other in most instances
the subject once gone is lost for ever. a striking confirmation of
this is: that when where from the circumstances of the invasion and the
at [in this latter] case the case of moveable property the subject or in default, that person [substructing] to make a satisfaction is still forthcoming: the extraordinary
penalty is immediately removed and the same moderate one adopted as in the other
case is adopted. This is the case of a wrongful possessi taking of a
moveable possession on pretence of Title; now whereon to support that pretence &
|
Identifier: | JB/096/107/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
legislation |
||
|
107 |
introd. laws civil & criminal |
||
|
001 |
division all laws penal |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
f9 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
31111 |
|||
