JB/096/111/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/111/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/111/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/111/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Were the Duty once recognized for what he<lb/>
is: just, according to our notions of<lb/>
justice: benevolent, according to our notions of<lb/>
benevolence, <note>as well as powerful according to our notions of power</note> the <add>whole</add> affair of Religion would be<lb/>
plain and easy <add>short and easy</add> &#x2014; The current systems<lb/></p>


<p><note>The current System</note> There would be no such thing as what are commonly<lb/>
called Religious duties. The <add>Our</add> duties<lb/>
of Theology would vanish into smoke<lb/>
to God would no longer be opposed to our<lb/>
duties to our neighbour. The former would<lb/>
be no longer supposed to consist in a<lb/>
different set of acts, in a different act<lb/>
of sentiments: but as the same set of<lb/>
acts and sentiments as the latter, under a<lb/>
different point of view: a point of view<lb/>
if not false, yet useless.</p>


<p>One might say were pernicious: since<lb/>
it leads men to reduce, or to increase the catalogue:<lb/>
which can not be reduced without a domination<lb/>
of happiness, that is without mischief to<lb/>
others; nor increased without mischief to <del>himself</del> <add>one</add><lb/>
man's self.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 21:53, 2 November 2011

Click Here To Edit

Were the Duty once recognized for what he
is: just, according to our notions of
justice: benevolent, according to our notions of
benevolence, as well as powerful according to our notions of power the whole affair of Religion would be
plain and easy short and easy — The current systems

The current System There would be no such thing as what are commonly
called Religious duties. The Our duties
of Theology would vanish into smoke
to God would no longer be opposed to our
duties to our neighbour. The former would
be no longer supposed to consist in a
different set of acts, in a different act
of sentiments: but as the same set of
acts and sentiments as the latter, under a
different point of view: a point of view
if not false, yet useless.

One might say were pernicious: since
it leads men to reduce, or to increase the catalogue:
which can not be reduced without a domination
of happiness, that is without mischief to
others; nor increased without mischief to himself one
man's self.



Identifier: | JB/096/111/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

111

Info in main headings field

introd. law divine no separate rule of action

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31115

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in