★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<p>(1)<lb/> | <p>(1)<lb/> | ||
☞ 25 Nov. Query whether to employ this?</p> | ☞ 25 Nov. Query whether to employ this?</p> | ||
<p | <p>Question <del>from</del> as per Holy West – Is this be that<lb/> | ||
should men? <unclear>Answer</unclear>: <del>No for it</del> as per the same – <gap/> | should men? <unclear>Answer</unclear>: <del>No for it</del> as per the same – <del><gap/></del><lb/> | ||
</p> | and accordingly, if Law Reform be what you wish here<lb/> | ||
to effect or employ himself with any degree of success or<lb/> | |||
endeavour to effect, you must look for <add>to</add> another.</p> | |||
<p>That of the removal of the mark from a <unclear>certain</unclear> face<lb/> | |||
the supposition of needfulness is not <del>groundless fanciful and</del><lb/> | |||
ungrounded and purely fanciful, the following occurrence will<lb/> | |||
suffice to prove.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1831 Oct. 19
Bankruptcy Court Hill Observation
(1)
☞ 25 Nov. Query whether to employ this?
Question from as per Holy West – Is this be that
should men? Answer: No for it as per the same –
and accordingly, if Law Reform be what you wish here
to effect or employ himself with any degree of success or
endeavour to effect, you must look for to another.
That of the removal of the mark from a certain face
the supposition of needfulness is not groundless fanciful and
ungrounded and purely fanciful, the following occurrence will
suffice to prove.
|
Identifier: | JB/004/428/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1831-10-19 |
15-16 |
||
|
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
|
428 |
bankruptcy court bill observations |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
2349 |
|||
