★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<p><gap/> p.7 in the middle</p> | <p><gap/> p.7 in the middle</p> | ||
Art. 16 <del>Art <gap/></del>. At the end of [ ] day after the<lb/> | <p>Art. 16 <del>Art <gap/></del>. At the end of [ ] day after the<lb/> | ||
precontestion of <del>the</del> <add>each such </add> <hi rend="underline">Justice Minister</hi>, <add><hi rend="underline">Contested Interpretation</hi> </add> <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">Report</hi> <gap/> to the<lb/> | precontestion of <del>the</del> <add>each such </add> <hi rend="underline">Justice Minister</hi>, <add><hi rend="underline">Contested Interpretation</hi> </add> <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">Report</hi> <gap/> to the<lb/> | ||
Legislation Minister for the use of the said committee,<lb/> | Legislation Minister for the use of the said committee,<lb/> | ||
<del>if <gap/> <gap/> at</del> <add>if, without that time no mention has been</add> made in the <gap/> committee for the taking<lb/> | <del>if <gap/> <gap/> at</del> <add>if, without that time no mention has been</add> made in the <gap/> committee for the taking<lb/> | ||
sent Report into consideration, the interpretation so transmitted<add><del><gap/></del></add><lb/> | |||
<add><del>fix<gap/></del> approved or delivered</add> by the Justice Minister will, <del>be conn<gap/> <gap/> <gap/>pted</del><lb/> | |||
as in the case of an exercise given to the <add><hi rend="underline">Judges</hi></add> <hi rend="underline">presenterpretive</hi>, as<lb/> | |||
<add>per §.18</add> is to the eventually <gap/> function <add>as per §. 19</add> be considered as<lb/> | |||
adequate by the Legislative, and <del><gap/> <gap/></del> corresponding<lb/> | |||
amendment, <hi rend="underline">directive</hi> or <hi rend="underline">reciditive</hi>, or the case may <del><gap/></del> <lb/> | |||
require <del>applied to the body of the law <add>appropriate part or parts of the</add> </del> will by the Legislative <lb/> | |||
Minister, be applied to the part or parts in question<lb/> | |||
of the body of the law as per Ch.XI §.2. Art. 13. ! <note>Back to p.7 in the middle</note></p> | |||
—<lb/> | |||
<p><del>Any<gap/> Justice Ministers <gap/> Interpre</del>tative Table</p> | |||
<note>[+] From the<lb/> | |||
bottom of this page.<lb/> | |||
—</note> <p><del>Art. 17 In this Report. At the and of this</del></p> | |||
Of these cases at the end of his said <lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Report</hi>, he will subjoin a <add>separate</add> Table in which <add><hi rend="underline">Annual Interpretative Diversity</hi></add> commencing<lb/> | |||
with the Commencement of the Pan<gap/>mism, the<lb/> | |||
several words or passages which in the course of the<lb/> | |||
year have been <add>respectively</add> the subjects of a conflicting interpret<add>ations</add><lb/> | |||
<add>-tations <del>between Judicatory and on different</del> the occasion of differentsuits, as in this Article<lb/> | |||
just mentioned,</add> will be exhibited with the conflicting interpretations<lb/> | |||
respectively applying to them and indicative <del>if</del> given<lb/> | |||
<add>of the functioning and other through if any himself included<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/>self to <gap/></del></add> <del>given of the pursuer</del> by ar<gap/> they were respectively<lb/> | |||
prepared, <del><gap/> with himself</del> subjoining in each<lb/> | |||
instances any such remarks as he may see reason<lb/> | |||
to make.</p> | |||
<note>To p.9.</note><lb/> | |||
—<lb/> | |||
<p>(1)</p> | |||
<note>From p.7 at bottom<lb/> | |||
<p>Art. <del>4</del>8</note><lb/> | |||
In each of two <del>or more</del> <add>having place between <del>instituted by</del> different parties <del>and</del></add> suits having <del><gap/>commenced in</del><lb/> | |||
on different grounds and having no communication <del>with</del> one<lb/> | |||
<del>with</del> another it may happen that of the same word or<lb/> | |||
passage interpretation <del>may</del> has been given, and that the two<lb/> | |||
interpretations have been different from each other and conflicting.</p><note>To the middel of this page [+]</note><lb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1825 Nov. 8
Constitutional Code
copd
Ch.XII Judiciary collectively
§.21. Contested interpretation
reporting function
p.7 in the middle
Art. 16 Art . At the end of [ ] day after the
precontestion of the each such Justice Minister, Contested Interpretation Report to the
Legislation Minister for the use of the said committee,
if at if, without that time no mention has been made in the committee for the taking
sent Report into consideration, the interpretation so transmitted
fix approved or delivered by the Justice Minister will, be conn pted
as in the case of an exercise given to the Judges presenterpretive, as
per §.18 is to the eventually function as per §. 19 be considered as
adequate by the Legislative, and corresponding
amendment, directive or reciditive, or the case may
require applied to the body of the law appropriate part or parts of the will by the Legislative
Minister, be applied to the part or parts in question
of the body of the law as per Ch.XI §.2. Art. 13. ! Back to p.7 in the middle
—
Any Justice Ministers Interpretative Table
[+] From the
bottom of this page.
—
Art. 17 In this Report. At the and of this
Of these cases at the end of his said
Report, he will subjoin a separate Table in which Annual Interpretative Diversity commencing
with the Commencement of the Panmism, the
several words or passages which in the course of the
year have been respectively the subjects of a conflicting interpretations
-tations between Judicatory and on different the occasion of differentsuits, as in this Article
just mentioned, will be exhibited with the conflicting interpretations
respectively applying to them and indicative if given
of the functioning and other through if any himself included
self to given of the pursuer by ar they were respectively
prepared, with himself subjoining in each
instances any such remarks as he may see reason
to make.
To p.9.
—
(1)
From p.7 at bottom
Art. 48
In each of two or more having place between instituted by different parties and suits having commenced in
on different grounds and having no communication with one
with another it may happen that of the same word or
passage interpretation may has been given, and that the two
interpretations have been different from each other and conflicting.
To the middel of this page [+]
Identifier: | JB/042/401/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1825-11-08 |
|||
042 |
constitutional code |
||
401 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e8 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
"copd" |
13324 |
||