JB/013/077/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/013/077/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/013/077/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/013/077/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>If I do not
</p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<p>1820 Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> 22<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi><lb/>
<!-- pencil --><head>For J.B.  Bowring to Torreno</head></p>
<p><del>Unless as well in the Committee there be one will strong</del> <add><del>As mutual concession</del> Along <del>and</del> with and in proportion to, mutual concessions</add><lb/>
<del>enough to swallow up all the rest, <add>there comes</add> their mutual concessions<lb/>
must be the consequence and there goes consistency.  Such<lb/>
comes inconsistencies of which but too many are <gap/> (<gap/> <gap/>)<lb/>
to a considerable degree would indeed be the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
were the work code <add>avowedly</add> the work of</del> one <del><gap/></del> <add>dullard and</add> individual<lb/>
hand.  True:  but then there would remain the consistent<lb/>
work serving as a standard, to which all inconsistent<lb/>
ones might be compared, and by which the <del><gap/></del> otherwise<lb/>
continually encreasing number of inconsistencies might in<lb/>
some degree be restrained.  For want of <del>this</del> such a standard<lb/>
not only is the English Statute law <del>begun</del> <add>commencing</add> as early as the<lb/>
thirteenth Century, <del>but</del> <add>a perfect chaos, but so is already</add> the Statute law of British India<lb/>
commencing <del>but t'other day.</del> within his memory.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 04:58, 14 October 2022

Click Here To Edit

If I do not


1820 Novr. 22d.
For J.B. Bowring to Torreno

Unless as well in the Committee there be one will strong As mutual concession Along and with and in proportion to, mutual concessions
enough to swallow up all the rest, there comes their mutual concessions
must be the consequence and there goes consistency. Such
comes inconsistencies of which but too many are ( )
to a considerable degree would indeed be the
were the work code avowedly the work of
one dullard and individual
hand. True: but then there would remain the consistent
work serving as a standard, to which all inconsistent
ones might be compared, and by which the otherwise
continually encreasing number of inconsistencies might in
some degree be restrained. For want of this such a standard
not only is the English Statute law begun commencing as early as the
thirteenth Century, but a perfect chaos, but so is already the Statute law of British India
commencing but t'other day. within his memory.



Identifier: | JB/013/077/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 13.

Date_1

1820-11-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

013

Main Headings

letters to toreno

Folio number

077

Info in main headings field

for jb bowring to torreno

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman 1819

Marginals

Paper Producer

john flowerdew colls

Corrections

john flowerdew colls

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

letter 2720, vol. 10

ID Number

4526

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in