JB/042/340/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/340/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1823. August. 1827 Nov. 15. 5<lb/>
Constitutional Code</head>
 
<note>1o2<lb/>
III Rationale<lb/>
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/>
&sect;. 16 13 Justice for the Helpless</note>
 
<p>15</p>
 
<note>34<lb/>
For defraying annual expence<lb/>
of Jud. Establishment with<lb/>
or without Sinking fund<lb/>
for repaying capital and<lb/>
for building Justice Chambers<lb/>
&amp;c &#x2014; employing Fines levied<lb/>
on litigants.</note>
 
E<p>nactive. Instructional.<lb/>
Art. 34. Means of defraying in part or the whole the annual<lb/>
expence of the Judicial Establishment, with or without the<lb/>
addition of a Sinking Fund for paying off the capital if<lb/>
borrowed for the expence of construction of the Justice Chambers<lb/>
&amp; appurtenances in the several sub-districts and Districts.</p>
 
<p>This fund is composed of fines to be imposed for criminal evil<lb/>
consciousness and vexatious temerity on the part of litigants<lb/>
on both sides.</p>
 
<note>35.<lb/>
1. As to its conduciveness<lb/>
to ends of justice &#x2014; besides<lb/>
the saving to public<lb/>
2. the aim of securing its<lb/>
productiveness.</note>
 
<p>Ratiocinative<lb/>
Art. 35. 1. As to the utility of it with reference in re3spect of its conduciveness to the several ends<lb/>
of justice, independently of the benefit of the saving of the<lb/>
expence to the public at large.</p>
 
<p>2. As to the means of giving effect to this system in such<lb/>
manner as to secure the productiveness of it.</p>
 
<note>36<lb/>
First conduciveness to<lb/>
ends of justice &#x2014; collateral<lb/>
in particular: exclusion of<lb/>
needless &amp; pernicious suits<lb/>
and defences.</note>
 
<p>Ratiocinative<lb/>
Art. 36. First as to its conduciveness to the ends of <gap/> justice, in particular<lb/>
to the collateral ends namely the exclusion of needless<lb/>
delay vexation and expence: by the exclusion of needless and<lb/>
thence pernicious suits and offences defences, pregnant with undue<lb/>
vexation to the several parties who are respectively on the<lb/>
right side.</p>
 
<note>37<lb/>
The punishment will fall<lb/>
on the authors of such suits:<lb/>
as a tax it is prohibitive.<lb/>
The greater the magnitude of proportional<lb/>
fine &#x2014; the greater<lb/>
its deterritive force with<lb/>
reference to future contingent<lb/>
unjust suits &amp;c.</note>
 
<p>Art. 37. 3. The punishment will, by the supposition, fall exclusively<lb/>
on those on whose part the blame has place: to wit, the<lb/>
authors of <gap/> unjust suits and the authors of unjust defences.<lb/>
Considered as a tax, it's is tendency is purposely <gap/> of the prohibitive<lb/>
one cast: of its two indisputably and jointly probable effects, this<lb/>
prohibition is, in so far as its effect is preventive, is the more desirable and probable one of the<lb/>
two, and goes hand in hand with its antagonist the productive: financial<lb/>
they <gap/> the fine: The magnitude of the fine being given, the greater its proportion to the pecuniary demands<lb/>
circumstances of the individual in question being given, the greater<lb/>
its deterative force: its deterative is the deterritive force: &#x2014; its deterritive and thereby preventive force, with force as applying to the<lb/>
prevention of reference to future contingent unjust pursuits or defences, as the once may be.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 08:32, 20 October 2022

Click Here To Edit

1823. August. 1827 Nov. 15. 5
Constitutional Code

1o2
III Rationale
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§. 16 13 Justice for the Helpless

15

34
For defraying annual expence
of Jud. Establishment with
or without Sinking fund
for repaying capital and
for building Justice Chambers
&c — employing Fines levied
on litigants.

E

nactive. Instructional.
Art. 34. Means of defraying in part or the whole the annual
expence of the Judicial Establishment, with or without the
addition of a Sinking Fund for paying off the capital if
borrowed for the expence of construction of the Justice Chambers
& appurtenances in the several sub-districts and Districts.

This fund is composed of fines to be imposed for criminal evil
consciousness and vexatious temerity on the part of litigants
on both sides.

35.
1. As to its conduciveness
to ends of justice — besides
the saving to public
2. the aim of securing its
productiveness.

Ratiocinative
Art. 35. 1. As to the utility of it with reference in re3spect of its conduciveness to the several ends
of justice, independently of the benefit of the saving of the
expence to the public at large.

2. As to the means of giving effect to this system in such
manner as to secure the productiveness of it.

36
First conduciveness to
ends of justice — collateral
in particular: exclusion of
needless & pernicious suits
and defences.

Ratiocinative
Art. 36. First as to its conduciveness to the ends of justice, in particular
to the collateral ends namely the exclusion of needless
delay vexation and expence: by the exclusion of needless and
thence pernicious suits and offences defences, pregnant with undue
vexation to the several parties who are respectively on the
right side.

37
The punishment will fall
on the authors of such suits:
as a tax it is prohibitive.
The greater the magnitude of proportional
fine — the greater
its deterritive force with
reference to future contingent
unjust suits &c.

Art. 37. 3. The punishment will, by the supposition, fall exclusively
on those on whose part the blame has place: to wit, the
authors of unjust suits and the authors of unjust defences.
Considered as a tax, it's is tendency is purposely of the prohibitive
one cast: of its two indisputably and jointly probable effects, this
prohibition is, in so far as its effect is preventive, is the more desirable and probable one of the
two, and goes hand in hand with its antagonist the productive: financial
they the fine: The magnitude of the fine being given, the greater its proportion to the pecuniary demands
circumstances of the individual in question being given, the greater
its deterative force: its deterative is the deterritive force: — its deterritive and thereby preventive force, with force as applying to the
prevention of reference to future contingent unjust pursuits or defences, as the once may be.




Identifier: | JB/042/340/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1823-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

34-37

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

340

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

enactive instructional / ratiocinative

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d15 / e15

Penner

richard doane

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

richard doane

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

13263

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in