JB/047/008/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/047/008/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/047/008/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/008/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/008/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p><head>Perjury Definition of</head></p>  
<p><head>Perjury Definition of</head></p>  
Perjury is the willfully taking of a false oath<lb/>
<p>Perjury is <del>the willfully taking of a false Oath<lb/>
by one who when a person having cowfully <gap/> to <unclear>depore</unclear> the truth<lb/>
by one who</del> <add>where a person</add> having <add>lawfully</add> required <add>by any person having Authority s to do</add> to depose the truth<lb/>
upon oath in any matter by any <gap/><lb/>
upon Oath in any matter <del>by any person having<lb/>
<del>Authority to <gap/></del> knowingly what is false<lb/>
Authority to requ</del> swears knowingly what is false<lb/>
as to something which is material to the in<lb/>
[as to something which is material to the point in<lb/>
question.]<lb/>
question.]</p>
 
<p>This to take in <hi rend="underline">Examinations</hi> which perhaps<lb/>
This to take in examinations which perhaps<lb/>
strictly speaking may not be concerning any<lb/>
strictly speaking may not be <gap/> my<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">judicial proceeding</hi>,<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> as not being in a delegated<lb/>
the breach of an <gap/>. Authority to <gap/><lb/>
matter – for instance such as are presented by<lb/>
<gap/> as to something which is material to the <gap/><lb/>
the River Lea Act <del><gap/></del> 7. G. 3. 54 &sect; <del>5</del> 65. made<lb/>
question.<lb/>  
Perjury by &sect;.103.  And by the Bread Act 31. G.2.29. &sect;.18. tho' not upon Oath where a <del><gap/></del> <add>special</add> Penalty<lb/>
This to take in examinations which<lb/>
<add>less</add> than for Perjury is appointed.  And by 9.<lb/>
speaking may not be
<del><gap/> <gap/> Punishment, which however to be</del> <add>G. 3. 41. &sect; 5.<hi rend="superscript">‡</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">‡</hi> This is a Custom-House Oath</note>  And by 5. G. 3. 9. 28. a </add> Court<lb/>
judicial proceeding, as not being in a <lb/><lb/>
of Conscience Act.  11. G. 3. 55. &sect;4.  Wherein an<lb/>
matter for mistake such as are presented by
Oath of Qualification is required.  But no Perjury <add>Clause</add> in<lb/>
of Conscience
3. G. 3. 24. another <del>Perjury</del> Parliament-Election-Qualification<lb/>
 
Act.</p>
<p><note>Perjury therefore is<lb/>
the breach of an <hi rend="superscript">Assertory</hi><lb/>
not of a <hi rend="underline">Promissory</hi><lb/>
Oath.<lb/>
This was the distinction<lb/>
which L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Coke hade<lb/>
in mind (in 3 Inst.<lb/>
166 quoted in Burns<lb/>
Tit. Perjury) <del><gap/></del> he<lb/>
wanted this Nomenclature<lb/>
to express it.<lb/>
The word in 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> <unclear>Hawke</unclear><lb/>
172.  Quoted in<lb/>
3 Burn 299.  Tit.<lb/>
Perjury.</note></p>
<p>PERJURY – Definition.  [BR][8.]</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 01:38, 26 October 2022

Click Here To Edit

Perjury Definition of

Perjury is the willfully taking of a false Oath
by one who
where a person having lawfully required by any person having Authority s to do to depose the truth
upon Oath in any matter by any person having
Authority to requ
swears knowingly what is false
[as to something which is material to the point in
question.]

This to take in Examinations which perhaps
strictly speaking may not be concerning any
judicial proceeding,+ as not being in a delegated
matter – for instance such as are presented by
the River Lea Act 7. G. 3. 54 § 5 65. made
Perjury by §.103. And by the Bread Act 31. G.2.29. §.18. tho' not upon Oath where a special Penalty
less than for Perjury is appointed. And by 9.
Punishment, which however to be G. 3. 41. § 5. This is a Custom-House Oath And by 5. G. 3. 9. 28. a Court
of Conscience Act. 11. G. 3. 55. §4. Wherein an
Oath of Qualification is required. But no Perjury Clause in
3. G. 3. 24. another Perjury Parliament-Election-Qualification
Act.

Perjury therefore is
the breach of an Assertory
not of a Promissory
Oath.
This was the distinction
which Ld Coke hade
in mind (in 3 Inst.
166 quoted in Burns
Tit. Perjury) he
wanted this Nomenclature
to express it.
The word in 1st Hawke
172. Quoted in
3 Burn 299. Tit.
Perjury.

PERJURY – Definition. [BR][8.]


Identifier: | JB/047/008/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

047

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

008

Info in main headings field

perjury definition

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial propatria britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

14876

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in