JB/042/354/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/354/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1824. March 1825 Nov. 3. ++ 1827 Nov. 15
Constitutional Code.
 
<!-- Following 2 marginal notes are deleted -->
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
&sect;.15. Justice for the poorest Helpless
 
When indigence on defendant's
side, law a positive
instrument of the evil.
A tyranny in which part
taken by Legislator &amp; Judge
more direct.
 
Instructional
Art. 8. Thus far, as to the mode in which the
evil is produced, where the indigence is on the Pursuer's
side. In so far as it is on the Defendant's side,
the power of the law is an the instrument of the evil, not merely in a negative,
but actually in a positive way. the grand instrument by the operation
of which the evil is produced. In this case, any
person who, <gap/><gap/><gap/> finding himself in a state of relative opulence chooses to take for
this purpose a station on the pursuer's side, is thus
by the power which the legislator and the Judge offer to his hands,
enabled to inflict, on ever person, relatively indigent,
whom he has any desire thus to injure, suffering in
any shape, in which on any occasion, on the score against a demand requiring it to be
submitted to, whether on the score score of <gap/> alleged guilt or otherwise, <note>he is, by want of the
necessary pecuniary
supply, bereft of
the means of</note>
of guilt or otherwise, and person is empowered by law
<gap/> of making what would <gap/> be regarded a satisfactory defence.
<gap/><gap/><gap/>. Here then is a tyranny, of which the
powers of the Legislator and that of the Judge, are in
a more  direct way the instruments. <!-- Paragraph mark --> <gap/><gap/><gap/>
 
Also original &amp; incidental
but in both cases judicial
 
Instructional
Art. 9. In this case the distinction between the original and the incidental
evil, as above, has place likewise. In neither
case, however, can it be termed extrajudicial:
in both cases, it is strictly and purely judicial: the powers of the in both cases it is
exclusively of legal and judicial manufacture: with by the express <note>ordinance, or what comes
to the same thing, by
the tacit allowance
of the legislator, the
power of the Judge</note>
Judge being the very and only instrument by which
it the evil is produced.<!-- Paragraph mark -->
 
Even when positive proof
requisite &#x2014; result the same
when too indigent to produce evidence
to prove innocence &#x2014; or
prosecute for paying.
 
Instructional
Art. 10. An exception may appear to be presented, by those cases above excepted, in which,
for conviction, positive proof of delinquency is
made necessary, the circumstantial and negative
proof afforded by non-appearance or non-defence not being taken
for conclusive. But, even where <gap/> positive proof
is thus made requisite, the same disastrous consequence may be
the assured foreseen and assured preassured result of relative <gap/> indigence.
In the case of a criminal prosecution the innocence
of the defendant is capable of being proved would be made manifest (suppose) by the true and conclu conclusive
evidence, if produced: but, the production of it can not be effected
without expence, and he has not wherewithal to defray that
expence, much less to defray the expence of a prosecution, as for perjury
against
<note>against false witnesses
if engaged, on <gap/> the pursuer's
side. In this condition,
every adversary who is
profligate enough to be
ready to take advantage
of it, beholds in him a
victim, to whim escape from slaughter destruction is impossible. <!-- Paragraph mark -->
 
Art. 11.</note>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 08:36, 5 November 2022

Click Here To Edit

1824. March 1825 Nov. 3. ++ 1827 Nov. 15 Constitutional Code.

Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively §.15. Justice for the poorest Helpless

When indigence on defendant's side, law a positive instrument of the evil. A tyranny in which part taken by Legislator & Judge more direct.

Instructional Art. 8. Thus far, as to the mode in which the evil is produced, where the indigence is on the Pursuer's side. In so far as it is on the Defendant's side, the power of the law is an the instrument of the evil, not merely in a negative, but actually in a positive way. the grand instrument by the operation of which the evil is produced. In this case, any person who, finding himself in a state of relative opulence chooses to take for this purpose a station on the pursuer's side, is thus by the power which the legislator and the Judge offer to his hands, enabled to inflict, on ever person, relatively indigent, whom he has any desire thus to injure, suffering in any shape, in which on any occasion, on the score against a demand requiring it to be submitted to, whether on the score score of alleged guilt or otherwise, he is, by want of the necessary pecuniary supply, bereft of the means of of guilt or otherwise, and person is empowered by law of making what would be regarded a satisfactory defence. . Here then is a tyranny, of which the powers of the Legislator and that of the Judge, are in a more direct way the instruments.

Also original & incidental but in both cases judicial

Instructional Art. 9. In this case the distinction between the original and the incidental evil, as above, has place likewise. In neither case, however, can it be termed extrajudicial: in both cases, it is strictly and purely judicial: the powers of the in both cases it is exclusively of legal and judicial manufacture: with by the express ordinance, or what comes to the same thing, by the tacit allowance of the legislator, the power of the Judge Judge being the very and only instrument by which it the evil is produced.

Even when positive proof requisite — result the same when too indigent to produce evidence to prove innocence — or prosecute for paying.

Instructional Art. 10. An exception may appear to be presented, by those cases above excepted, in which, for conviction, positive proof of delinquency is made necessary, the circumstantial and negative proof afforded by non-appearance or non-defence not being taken for conclusive. But, even where positive proof is thus made requisite, the same disastrous consequence may be the assured foreseen and assured preassured result of relative indigence. In the case of a criminal prosecution the innocence of the defendant is capable of being proved would be made manifest (suppose) by the true and conclu conclusive evidence, if produced: but, the production of it can not be effected without expence, and he has not wherewithal to defray that expence, much less to defray the expence of a prosecution, as for perjury against against false witnesses if engaged, on the pursuer's side. In this condition, every adversary who is profligate enough to be ready to take advantage of it, beholds in him a victim, to whim escape from slaughter destruction is impossible.

Art. 11.




Identifier: | JB/042/354/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1824-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

8-10

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

354

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

instructional

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

richard doane

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

13277

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in