JB/547/376/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/547/376/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/547/376/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/376/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/376/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->5 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1811</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Remains for consideration the Form above spoken of.<lb/>
 
That it may not remain as at present without a name by which to be spoken of <add>to be called by</add>,<lb/>
 
Form of a Remittance Bill let <del><gap/></del> it be called:  as for<lb/>
 
the legislator <add>author</add>, no name <add>it will be seen</add> has he given to it, he <add>himself</add> knew<lb/>
not very well (it should seem) what to make of it <add>himself</add>:  <del>at</del><lb/>
no names at any rate has he given to it.</p>
<p>A circumstance that seems to have escaped his observation<lb/>
is – that when two instruments are duplicates<lb/>
of each other the terms <del>of the</del> <add>words are</add> is in both of them exactly<lb/>
the same:  <add>and that</add> insomuch that whatsoever is said by<lb/>
either is said and with equal propriety by the other.</p>
<p>It begins thus<lb/>
"Sir  " Royal Hospital Greenwich.<lb/>
"Pay to [  ] of [  ] in the Country of [  ] <del><gap/> after</del><lb/>
(immediately after which it is <add>seems</add> probably intended, though<lb/>
not mentioned that the sum should be inserted) "upon<lb/>
"producing the duplicate hereof, together with a certificate"<lb/>
and so forth.</p>
<p>While penning the words "upon producing the duplicate<lb/>
hereof" what is obvious is that the instrument<lb/>
which the penman had in his mind was the instrument<lb/>
delivered or transmitted to the <del>applicant</del> Officer of Government.<lb/>
<add>Do you pay</add> Pay you the sum here mentioned to the person<lb/>
who shall <add>will</add> apply to you with a corresponding Bill or say<lb/>
Order in his hand <add>pay it to him upon his producing the correspondent instrument whatever that may be:  considered as sent as well as</add> addressed to this official person<lb/>
the language of the instrument was in this part of it<lb/>
<add>at least, apt and</add> proper language.  But, <del>addressed to</del> <add>considered as a standing part of an instrument having tending to the same object end but put into the hands of</add> the applicant<lb/>
himself this same language is not proper.  Of this<lb/>
instrument, the duplicate is in the hands of the Officer of<lb/>
Government:  the production of it can not on the part of<lb/>
the individual, the applicant, be made a condition,<lb/>
a condition precedent to his being entitled to receive the money<lb/>
from the officer of<lb/>
government who is<lb/>
thence drawn upon for it.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 04:11, 13 November 2022

Click Here To Edit

5 Jany 1811

Remains for consideration the Form above spoken of.
That it may not remain as at present without a name by which to be spoken of to be called by,
Form of a Remittance Bill let it be called: as for
the legislator author, no name it will be seen has he given to it, he himself knew
not very well (it should seem) what to make of it himself: at
no names at any rate has he given to it.

A circumstance that seems to have escaped his observation
is – that when two instruments are duplicates
of each other the terms of the words are is in both of them exactly
the same: and that insomuch that whatsoever is said by
either is said and with equal propriety by the other.

It begins thus
"Sir " Royal Hospital Greenwich.
"Pay to [ ] of [ ] in the Country of [ ] after
(immediately after which it is seems probably intended, though
not mentioned that the sum should be inserted) "upon
"producing the duplicate hereof, together with a certificate"
and so forth.

While penning the words "upon producing the duplicate
hereof" what is obvious is that the instrument
which the penman had in his mind was the instrument
delivered or transmitted to the applicant Officer of Government.
Do you pay Pay you the sum here mentioned to the person
who shall will apply to you with a corresponding Bill or say
Order in his hand pay it to him upon his producing the correspondent instrument whatever that may be: considered as sent as well as addressed to this official person
the language of the instrument was in this part of it
at least, apt and proper language. But, addressed to considered as a standing part of an instrument having tending to the same object end but put into the hands of the applicant
himself this same language is not proper. Of this
instrument, the duplicate is in the hands of the Officer of
Government: the production of it can not on the part of
the individual, the applicant, be made a condition,
a condition precedent to his being entitled to receive the money
from the officer of
government who is
thence drawn upon for it.


Identifier: | JB/547/376/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547.

Date_1

1811-01-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

547

Main Headings

Folio number

376

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in