JB/547/362/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/547/362/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/547/362/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/362/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/362/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->5 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1811<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>&sect;. 95</head></p>
 
<p>The Treasurer a <unclear>cypher</unclear> since his deputy (line 29) is allowed<lb/>
 
to legislate.</p>
 
<p>But the passage in <add>by</add> which the denouncement is brought <add>made</add><lb/>
about remains still behind <add>unreported</add>:  reported <add>brought to view</add> it could not conveniently<lb/>
<add>intelligibly</add> be, till the proposition <del><gap/></del> in relation to which<lb/>
it serves as a limitation clause were brought to view<lb/>
as above.  <del>The Remittance is to be</del> By means<lb/>
of the Remittance Bill, or the other means thus <add>so</add> placed at<lb/>
the discretion <add>option</add> of the Treasurer, the remittance is to<lb/>
be effected – In what cases? in all cases?  No: in<lb/>
such cases as were <add>are</add> considered as <del>most</del> likely to be <add>most frequently</add> exemplified?<lb/>
Nor that neither.  In what then?  <add>Answer</add> In this<lb/>
only viz. "if from distance <add>of residence</add> or any other cause,  such<lb/>
"Claimant .... shall not be able conveniently to attend<lb/>
"at the said Royal Hospital to demand the same", be<lb/>
that the case which <add>in this parenthesis</add> is here represented as the principal<lb/>
one is the case the <add>very</add> opposite to <del>that</del> the only case <add>for</add> which<lb/>
at the outset the legislator in his preamble <add>took in hand and</add> set about<lb/>
providing for.</p>
<p>If for all <add>or any <del>part of</del> considerable part of all</add> this complication there could be any<lb/>
pretence it would be in the <del>difficulty</del> inconvenience<lb/>
or impracticability <del>attaching on</del> of a personal intercourse<lb/>
between the applicant and the person <del>to</del> whom it would<lb/>
be proper to employ in forming a judgment upon<lb/>
the goodness of his title.  The simplest case is where the<lb/>
judgment in question may be formed by <add>this judicial</add> the <add>official</add> person himself.<lb/>
The next most simple is where for forming the <add>like</add> judgment the<lb/>
place in question affords <del>a pers</del> another person – a deputy of<lb/>
his who is <del><gap/></del> not only known to him but the object of his<lb/>
<add>confidence.</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:59, 14 November 2022

Click Here To Edit

5 Jany 1811
§. 95

The Treasurer a cypher since his deputy (line 29) is allowed
to legislate.

But the passage in by which the denouncement is brought made
about remains still behind unreported: reported brought to view it could not conveniently
intelligibly be, till the proposition in relation to which
it serves as a limitation clause were brought to view
as above. The Remittance is to be By means
of the Remittance Bill, or the other means thus so placed at
the discretion option of the Treasurer, the remittance is to
be effected – In what cases? in all cases? No: in
such cases as were are considered as most likely to be most frequently exemplified?
Nor that neither. In what then? Answer In this
only viz. "if from distance of residence or any other cause, such
"Claimant .... shall not be able conveniently to attend
"at the said Royal Hospital to demand the same", be
that the case which in this parenthesis is here represented as the principal
one is the case the very opposite to that the only case for which
at the outset the legislator in his preamble took in hand and set about
providing for.

If for all or any part of considerable part of all this complication there could be any
pretence it would be in the difficulty inconvenience
or impracticability attaching on of a personal intercourse
between the applicant and the person to whom it would
be proper to employ in forming a judgment upon
the goodness of his title. The simplest case is where the
judgment in question may be formed by this judicial the official person himself.
The next most simple is where for forming the like judgment the
place in question affords a pers another person – a deputy of
his who is not only known to him but the object of his
confidence.


Identifier: | JB/547/362/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547.

Date_1

1811-01-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

547

Main Headings

Folio number

362

Info in main headings field

§. 95

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in