★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/547/222/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/222/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/547/222/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->21 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1810<lb/> | |||
' | <!-- pencil --><head>Prize Acts 1805 1809 §. 5</head></p> | ||
<p>To the continuation of Raffhead's edition of the Statutes<lb/> | |||
<add>is another person to whom</add> this mystery <del><gap/></del> seems <add>also</add> to have presented itself<lb/> | |||
as <add>equally</add> inexplicable. In the margin of §. 75, see (says he)<lb/> | |||
§. 80: i.e. compare them together, and consider whether<lb/> | |||
change from three months can have been<lb/> | |||
any other than an oversight. When he required the<lb/> | |||
payment <del>to Greenwich Hospital</del> to Captors to be suspended<lb/> | |||
at the conclusion <add>on the <del>day</del> day</add> of the three months after the<lb/> | |||
day of its commencement, he intended <del>that</del> <add>his intention was</add> to fix upon<lb/> | |||
that same day for the payment of the residuum to<lb/> | |||
Greenwich Hospital to which the <del>business</del> <unclear>continuation</unclear><lb/> | |||
of the process of payment viz. to the Captors was meant<lb/> | |||
to be transferred. When afterwards <add>for the payment of the residuum to the Hospital</add> he fixt upon the last<lb/> | |||
day of the four months it seemed to him that he<lb/> | |||
had fixt upon the same day for discontinuing the<lb/> | |||
<add>payments made directly into the hands of captors.</add> payment to the captors own hand.</p> | |||
<p>Of nugatory reasons he has <del><gap/></del> scattered up and<lb/> | |||
down this Act of his a copious stock: nor whatsoever<lb/> | |||
may be the practice of Parliament is there any<lb/> | |||
Act of Parliament prohibiting the inserting into Acts<lb/> | |||
or bills any reasons that are other than nugatory<lb/> | |||
ones. How rare soever, if instruction reasons it<lb/> | |||
cannot be said that <add>in Acts of Parliament</add> they are altogether without precedents.<lb/> | |||
Here surely if this were any thing but<lb/> | |||
an oversight – here surely if anywhere, would have<lb/> | |||
been a case in which the following <add>pursuing</add> of such precedents<lb/> | |||
would have had its use.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} | ||
21 Decr 1810
Prize Acts 1805 1809 §. 5
To the continuation of Raffhead's edition of the Statutes
is another person to whom this mystery seems also to have presented itself
as equally inexplicable. In the margin of §. 75, see (says he)
§. 80: i.e. compare them together, and consider whether
change from three months can have been
any other than an oversight. When he required the
payment to Greenwich Hospital to Captors to be suspended
at the conclusion on the day day of the three months after the
day of its commencement, he intended that his intention was to fix upon
that same day for the payment of the residuum to
Greenwich Hospital to which the business continuation
of the process of payment viz. to the Captors was meant
to be transferred. When afterwards for the payment of the residuum to the Hospital he fixt upon the last
day of the four months it seemed to him that he
had fixt upon the same day for discontinuing the
payments made directly into the hands of captors. payment to the captors own hand.
Of nugatory reasons he has scattered up and
down this Act of his a copious stock: nor whatsoever
may be the practice of Parliament is there any
Act of Parliament prohibiting the inserting into Acts
or bills any reasons that are other than nugatory
ones. How rare soever, if instruction reasons it
cannot be said that in Acts of Parliament they are altogether without precedents.
Here surely if this were any thing but
an oversight – here surely if anywhere, would have
been a case in which the following pursuing of such precedents
would have had its use.
|
Identifier: | JB/547/222/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1810-12-21 |
|||
|
547 |
|||
|
222 |
Prizes. Acts of 1805 &1809. |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
|||
|
Jeremy Bentham |
|||
