JB/042/363/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/363/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1825. Jany. 21 Feb. 28. + Corrected from the Copy
Procedure Code. Copd
 
Ch. VI. Judiciary Applications collectively
&sect;.3. N<gap/>, oral only
&sect;. Checks
&sect;.17. Social add<gap/> prohibited intercourse
obviated
 
7
 
&sect;.17. Social intercourse obviated.
 
5
Art. 5. If in any such letter there be any portion of
&sect;.3. Mock of application <gap/> <gap/> <gap/>
of discourse having for its design or tendency the influencing
the conduct of the Judge, as such, by hope of good, or fear of
Art. 1. No otherwise than when orally
evil, at the hands of the letter writer, or any person on whose
delivered and <gap/> publicity in the judicial <gap/>
behalf he thus writes, the letter writer and every person <gap/> to
any judiciary application received receivable
<gap/><gap/><gap/> to the intention of its being conveyed to
But by any applicant attending as such
the Judge will be denied an intended <gap/> to him thereby
any letter to whomsoever addressed whether to himself
intended and endeavoured to produce corruption <gap/><gap/><gap/> on the part of
or to the Judge, or to any other person, the <gap/> letter <gap/>
the Judge; and the Judge in the character of a conniver the Judge will be deemed
upon, and the applicant responsible <gap/><gap/><gap/>
to have participated in the offence.
contacts.
 
1
Art. 1. Any letter






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 08:33, 24 November 2022

Click Here To Edit

1825. Jany. 21 Feb. 28. + Corrected from the Copy Procedure Code. Copd

Ch. VI. Judiciary Applications collectively §.3. N, oral only §. Checks §.17. Social add prohibited intercourse obviated

7

§.17. Social intercourse obviated.

5 Art. 5. If in any such letter there be any portion of §.3. Mock of application of discourse having for its design or tendency the influencing the conduct of the Judge, as such, by hope of good, or fear of Art. 1. No otherwise than when orally evil, at the hands of the letter writer, or any person on whose delivered and publicity in the judicial behalf he thus writes, the letter writer and every person to any judiciary application received receivable to the intention of its being conveyed to But by any applicant attending as such the Judge will be denied an intended to him thereby any letter to whomsoever addressed whether to himself intended and endeavoured to produce corruption on the part of or to the Judge, or to any other person, the letter the Judge; and the Judge in the character of a conniver the Judge will be deemed upon, and the applicant responsible to have participated in the offence. contacts.

1 Art. 1. Any letter




Identifier: | JB/042/363/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-01-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

363

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

secret intercourse obviated

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

"copd"

ID Number

13286

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in