★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1824. April <gap/>8. +<lb/> | |||
Constitutional Code Copd</head> | |||
<note>ulto<lb/> | |||
Ch. XI. Judiciary collectively<lb/> | |||
§. Partiality obviated</note> | |||
<p>2</p> | |||
<p>Art. 4. If, by exposure to the action of seductive interest in any shape<lb/> | |||
self-regarding, sympathetic or antipathetic as <gap/> above,<lb/> | |||
partiality is, by a party on either side of the suit suspected<lb/> | |||
regarded as liable to have place in the breast situation of the Judge,<lb/> | |||
to such party, as also to all other parties belongs the power of putting to the Judge questions to him him<lb/> | |||
Judge all such apt questions, by which the existence of non-<lb/> | |||
existence of such <gap/> partiality exposure may be established <gap/>.</p> | |||
<p>Art. 5. On this case occasion, the Judge removes from<lb/> | |||
the Judgment seat to the state seat appointed for<lb/> | |||
that side, in favor of which his partiality on his part is regarded<lb/> | |||
as liable to have place: and, at the same time, for the<lb/> | |||
single purpose of <gap/> deciding whether as to the existence<lb/> | |||
or non-existence of <gap/><gap/> of partiality <gap/><gap/> the exposure in<lb/> | |||
the breast situation of the Judge as above they <gap/><gap/> a judicatory<lb/> | |||
the <gap/> Pursuer General, the Defender General, or the<lb/> | |||
and the Registrar, place themselves on the Judgement<lb/> | |||
seat and constitute a Judicatory, the a majority determining<lb/> | |||
the decrees.</p> | |||
<p>Art. 6. If the decision be in the affirmative affirmance of the exposure,<lb/> | |||
the Judicatory proceeds to the choice of some other Judge locates some other person<lb/> | |||
for the cognizance of the suit, to as per Art. 1.: unless<lb/> | |||
all parties agree in the respect, concurr in a petition that <gap/> the <gap/><lb/> | |||
suit shall may remain in the cognizance of the Judge<lb/> | |||
notwithstanding.</p> | |||
<p><!-- This para is deleted -->Art. 7. To whatever Judge Whosoever be the Judge<lb/> | |||
<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> for this special purpose so located, <gap/><lb/> | |||
the like question as per Art. 3 may shall to him also be put, and<lb/> | |||
the same course will be taken as per Art. 4 and 5.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1824. April 8. +
Constitutional Code Copd
ulto
Ch. XI. Judiciary collectively
§. Partiality obviated
2
Art. 4. If, by exposure to the action of seductive interest in any shape
self-regarding, sympathetic or antipathetic as above,
partiality is, by a party on either side of the suit suspected
regarded as liable to have place in the breast situation of the Judge,
to such party, as also to all other parties belongs the power of putting to the Judge questions to him him
Judge all such apt questions, by which the existence of non-
existence of such partiality exposure may be established .
Art. 5. On this case occasion, the Judge removes from
the Judgment seat to the state seat appointed for
that side, in favor of which his partiality on his part is regarded
as liable to have place: and, at the same time, for the
single purpose of deciding whether as to the existence
or non-existence of of partiality the exposure in
the breast situation of the Judge as above they a judicatory
the Pursuer General, the Defender General, or the
and the Registrar, place themselves on the Judgement
seat and constitute a Judicatory, the a majority determining
the decrees.
Art. 6. If the decision be in the affirmative affirmance of the exposure,
the Judicatory proceeds to the choice of some other Judge locates some other person
for the cognizance of the suit, to as per Art. 1.: unless
all parties agree in the respect, concurr in a petition that the
suit shall may remain in the cognizance of the Judge
notwithstanding.
Art. 7. To whatever Judge Whosoever be the Judge
for this special purpose so located,
the like question as per Art. 3 may shall to him also be put, and
the same course will be taken as per Art. 4 and 5.
Identifier: | JB/042/369/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1824-04-08 |
4-6 |
||
042 |
constitutional code |
||
369 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e2 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
1824 |
|||
"copd" |
13292 |
||