JB/041/092/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/041/092/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/041/092/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/041/092/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/041/092/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1831 Aug. 7<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code.</head> 2<lb/>
 
<note>Ch. XV  Judge Deputes Occasional</note></p>
 
<p><gap/> of Reasons what the most advantageous?</p>
 
<p>Instructional continued<lb/>
Questions which on this occasion present themselves as calling for answer, are the following</p>
<p>1.  In what cases is it <del>the</del> on account of the public interest<lb/>
<add>at large</add> desirable that arbitration should have place.</p>
<p>2.  In what case is it desirable on account of the<lb/>
party or parties in the right in the case <add>on the occasion</add> of the individual<lb/>
suit in question, that arbitration should have place:  in<lb/>
other words in what case is it conducive to the ends of justice<lb/>
on the occasion of the individual suit in question that arbitration<lb/>
should have place.</p>
<p>3.  In what cases <del>is <gap/></del> under the existing system<lb/>
is it common for <add>natural that</add> <del>the</del> parties, regarding themselves as in the <del>wrong</del><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">right</hi> <del>be</del> <add>should</add> propose or to <del><gap/></del> <add>consent</add> that arbitration should have place?</p>
<p>4.  In what case <del>is it intend</del> that under any existing system<lb/>
<add>it is natural that</add> a party regarding himself as being in the <hi rend="underline">wrong</hi> should propose<lb/>
or consent that arbitration should have place?</p>
<p>2 5.  In what case <del>is it that</del> under the here proposed<lb/>
system <add>is it natural that</add> parties regarding themselves <add>as being</add> in the right should propose or<lb/>
consent that arbitration should have place?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 04:02, 16 December 2022

'Click Here To Edit

1831 Aug. 7
Constitutional Code. 2
Ch. XV Judge Deputes Occasional

of Reasons what the most advantageous?

Instructional continued
Questions which on this occasion present themselves as calling for answer, are the following

1. In what cases is it the on account of the public interest
at large desirable that arbitration should have place.

2. In what case is it desirable on account of the
party or parties in the right in the case on the occasion of the individual
suit in question, that arbitration should have place: in
other words in what case is it conducive to the ends of justice
on the occasion of the individual suit in question that arbitration
should have place.

3. In what cases is under the existing system
is it common for natural that the parties, regarding themselves as in the wrong
right be should propose or to consent that arbitration should have place?

4. In what case is it intend that under any existing system
it is natural that a party regarding himself as being in the wrong should propose
or consent that arbitration should have place?

2 5. In what case is it that under the here proposed
system is it natural that parties regarding themselves as being in the right should propose or
consent that arbitration should have place?


Identifier: | JB/041/092/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41.

Date_1

1831-08-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

041

Main Headings

Constitutional Code

Folio number

092

Info in main headings field

Constitutional Code

Image

001

Titles

Instructional continued

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

E2

Penner

Watermarks

STREET & Co 1830

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Antonio Alcala Galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1830

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in