JB/068/013/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/068/013/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/068/013/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/068/013/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1824 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> 20<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Penal Code</head></p>
 
<p>In its application to the enjoyments connected with<lb/>
 
the preservation of the species in every one of these extravagances<lb/>
 
does tyranny <add>still riot without controul</add> continue to indulge itself.</p>
<p>By the <del>physical taste</del> <add>physical appetites</add> of the tyrant has the standard<lb/>
been fixt:  from that standard every other appetite he <add>it</add> has<lb/>
regarded as an aberration:  and for the crime of aberration<lb/>
the penalty is death.</p>
<p><del><gap/></del> Four are the directions in which the quantity of<lb/>
crime has been ascribed to deviation from the course marked<lb/>
out by the standard appetite.  <add><unclear>Several</unclear></add> Errors 4:  1. error temporis:<lb/>
2. error loci.  3. error sexus:  4. error speciei.  5. error numeri.</p>
<p>1.  In the case of the error temporis the <unclear>sex</unclear> prescribed by<lb/>
orthodoxy has been adhered to:  <del>but</del> the error consists only<lb/>
in the article of time.  <del>In</del> <add>Deny</add> a certain <gap/> of the female<lb/>
mouth, <add>to</add> the appetite of the male tyrant <del>fails him</del> the patient<lb/>
is no longer an object of concupiscence.  Such as the case<lb/>
of <unclear>Moses</unclear>.  By the <gap/> of that religion what sprung <add>grew</add><lb/>
out of that of Moses this prohibition has not been adopted.<lb/>
Why <add>Wherefore</add> has it not?</p>
<p>2.  <del>In the case of</del> <add>With</add> the error loci the error sexus<lb/>
may be combined or not.  Where the sex is that prescribed<lb/>
by orthodoxy, the fury of orthodoxy <del>is</del> <add>has</add> not by this consideration<lb/>
been mollified, the single error <del>have</del> seems to have provoked<lb/>
still more indignation than even the double one:  <add>by it</add> the face of providence <add>the<lb/>
<gap/></add> <del>as</del> now <add>here</add> seems to be flown into, and the provision made<lb/>
by him set at defiance:  <unclear>receives</unclear> the truth would <add>it</add> have been<lb/>
<add>to say</add> <hi rend="underline">made the most of</hi>.  The <del>author of</del> book in question was <add>is</add> a <gap/><lb/>
book – the authors of the passage Serjeant <gap/>, and the learned<lb/>
Sarjeant had been a man and wife <add>his <gap/> like an apothecary and he felt like a man and wife</add> the error in this shape the tendency<lb/>
he saw would be to lessen practice.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 02:37, 31 December 2022

Click Here To Edit

1824 Decr. 20
Penal Code

In its application to the enjoyments connected with
the preservation of the species in every one of these extravagances
does tyranny still riot without controul continue to indulge itself.

By the physical taste physical appetites of the tyrant has the standard
been fixt: from that standard every other appetite he it has
regarded as an aberration: and for the crime of aberration
the penalty is death.

Four are the directions in which the quantity of
crime has been ascribed to deviation from the course marked
out by the standard appetite. Several Errors 4: 1. error temporis:
2. error loci. 3. error sexus: 4. error speciei. 5. error numeri.

1. In the case of the error temporis the sex prescribed by
orthodoxy has been adhered to: but the error consists only
in the article of time. In Deny a certain of the female
mouth, to the appetite of the male tyrant fails him the patient
is no longer an object of concupiscence. Such as the case
of Moses. By the of that religion what sprung grew
out of that of Moses this prohibition has not been adopted.
Why Wherefore has it not?

2. In the case of With the error loci the error sexus
may be combined or not. Where the sex is that prescribed
by orthodoxy, the fury of orthodoxy is has not by this consideration
been mollified, the single error have seems to have provoked
still more indignation than even the double one: by it the face of providence the
as now here seems to be flown into, and the provision made
by him set at defiance: receives the truth would it have been
to say made the most of. The author of book in question was is a
book – the authors of the passage Serjeant , and the learned
Sarjeant had been a man and wife his like an apothecary and he felt like a man and wife the error in this shape the tendency
he saw would be to lessen practice.


Identifier: | JB/068/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 68.

Date_1

1824-12-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

068

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

013

Info in main headings field

penal code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

22208

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in