JB/042/575/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/042/575/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/042/575/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>182<del>7</del>8 <sic><del>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic></del> 4<lb/>Constitutional Code</head> <p><note><sic.Ch.</sic. Judiciary collectively</note><lb/>(7 <note>&sect;.28 <sic>Locable</sic> who<lb/>Non-<sic>locable</sic>, Advocates</note></p> <p><note>20<lb/>The less powerful the<lb/>checks to insincerity the<lb/>less the trustworthiness</note></p> <p>Of the men belonging to this profession the trustworthiness<lb/>will be the less, the less powerful <Add>efficient</add> the check of all sort <add>in this case</add> which<lb/>stand opposed <add>apply</add> to insincerity; the greater, the more powerful <add>efficient</add>.<lb/>Accordingly under the here proposed system as compared with<lb/>the existing system the trustworthiness will be not a maximum,<lb/>and if the <add>opposite mode of</add> expression be preferred, their untrustworthiness<lb?>will be at an minimum.  Why?</p> <p>21<lb/>Under existing system<lb/>full sway given to<lb/>mendacity on the part<lb/>of lawyers</note></p> <p>Because under the existing system full <del>sway</del><lb/>sway is given to mendacity on the part of the Advocate &#x2014; to<lb/>being not the accompanying assistant but the substitute to<lb/>his client: and that in such sort that before the allegations<lb/><del>be</del> meet the ears ands eyes of the Judge they pass through several<lb/>medium each of which stands engaged by <add>its own</add> sinister<lb/>interest to infer into it <add>a mass of</add> <gap/> mendacity as great as<lb?>presents itself as affording a promise of being proof against punishment<lb/>and all <gap/></p> <p><note>22<lb/>Under proposed system<lb/>powerful checks to<lb/>mendacity by <sic>noninterposition</sic><lb/>of lawyers.</note></p> <p>On the other hand under the here proposed system there<lb/>stands before the Judge the individual &#x2014; the party from whom<lb/>without <gap/> through any such corruptive medium the<lb/>allegation passes directly to the ear and the eye to the mind of<lb/>the Judge.  There stands the party, who for <del>or in th</del> asserts uttered<lb/>by him, it being uttered to the Judge is <sic>compleatly</sic> and immediately<lb/><gap/>: interpose the Advocate, the responsibility is<lb/>extinguished.  <del>The Judge</del> In case of <sic>falshood</sic> on the part of the party<lb/>the Judge has nothing to prevent him from making it <gap/> and for<lb/>punishment: <add>on the part of</add> the Advocate <del>between</del> neither power nor instruction<lb/>so to do his plan.</p>
<head>182<del>7</del>8 <del><sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic></del> <sic>Feb.</sic> 4<lb/>Constitutional Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Judiciary collectively</note><lb/>(7 <note>&sect;.28 <sic>Locable</sic> who<lb/>Non-<sic>locable</sic>, Advocates</note></p> <p><note>20<lb/>The less powerful the<lb/>checks to insincerity the<lb/>less the trustworthiness</note></p> <p>Of the men belonging to this profession the trustworthiness<lb/>will be the less, the less powerful <add>efficient</add> the check of all sort <add>in this case</add> which<lb/>stand opposed <add>apply</add> to insincerity; the greater, the more powerful <add>efficient</add>.<lb/>Accordingly under the here proposed system as compared with<lb/>the existing system the trustworthiness will be not a maximum,<lb/>or if the <add>opposite mode of</add> expression be preferred, their untrustworthiness<lb/>will be at an minimum.  Why?</p> <p><note>21<lb/>Under existing system<lb/>full sway given to<lb/>mendacity on the part<lb/>of lawyers</note></p> <p>Because under the existing system full <del>sway</del><lb/>sway is given to mendacity, on the part of the Advocate &#x2014; to<lb/>being not the accompanying assistant but the substitute to<lb/>his client: and that in such sort that before the allegations<lb/><del>re</del> meet the ears ands eyes of the Judge they pass through several<lb/>mediums each of which stands engaged by <add>its own</add> sinister<lb/>interest to infer into it <add>a mass of</add> <gap/> mendacity as great as<lb/>presents itself as affording a promise of being proof against punishment<lb/>and all success.</p> <p><note>22<lb/>Under proposed system<lb/>powerful checks to<lb/>mendacity by <sic>noninterposition</sic><lb/>of lawyers.</note></p> <p>On the other hand under the here proposed system there<lb/>stands before the Judge the individual &#x2014; the party from whom<lb/>without passing through any such corruptive medium the<lb/>allegation passes directly to the ear and the eye to the mind of<lb/>the Judge.  There stands the party, who for <del>or in th</del> assertions uttered<lb/>by him, it being uttered to the Judge is <sic>compleatly</sic> and immediately<lb/>responsible: interpose the Advocate, the responsibility is<lb/>extinguished.  <del>The Judge</del> In case of <sic>falshood</sic> on the part of the party<lb/>the Judge has nothing to prevent him from making it with and <unclear>for</unclear><lb/>punishment: <add>on the part of</add> the Advocate <del>between</del> neither power nor instruction<lb/>so to do has place.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 11:46, 9 January 2023

Click Here To Edit

18278 Novr. Feb. 4
Constitutional Code

Ch. Judiciary collectively
(7 §.28 Locable who
Non-locable, Advocates

20
The less powerful the
checks to insincerity the
less the trustworthiness

Of the men belonging to this profession the trustworthiness
will be the less, the less powerful efficient the check of all sort in this case which
stand opposed apply to insincerity; the greater, the more powerful efficient.
Accordingly under the here proposed system as compared with
the existing system the trustworthiness will be not a maximum,
or if the opposite mode of expression be preferred, their untrustworthiness
will be at an minimum. Why?

21
Under existing system
full sway given to
mendacity on the part
of lawyers

Because under the existing system full sway
sway is given to mendacity, on the part of the Advocate — to
being not the accompanying assistant but the substitute to
his client: and that in such sort that before the allegations
re meet the ears ands eyes of the Judge they pass through several
mediums each of which stands engaged by its own sinister
interest to infer into it a mass of mendacity as great as
presents itself as affording a promise of being proof against punishment
and all success.

22
Under proposed system
powerful checks to
mendacity by noninterposition
of lawyers.

On the other hand under the here proposed system there
stands before the Judge the individual — the party from whom
without passing through any such corruptive medium the
allegation passes directly to the ear and the eye to the mind of
the Judge. There stands the party, who for or in th assertions uttered
by him, it being uttered to the Judge is compleatly and immediately
responsible: interpose the Advocate, the responsibility is
extinguished. The Judge In case of falshood on the part of the party
the Judge has nothing to prevent him from making it with and for
punishment: on the part of the Advocate between neither power nor instruction
so to do has place.




Identifier: | JB/042/575/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1828-02-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

20-22

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

575

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13498

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in