JB/042/416/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/416/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1823. Septr. 25. 1825 Nov. 1<lb/>
<head><del>1823. Septr.</del> 25. 1825 Nov. 1<lb/>
Constitutional Code. 1. Enactive Part.</head>
Constitutional Code. 1. Enactive Part.</head>


Line 10: Line 10:


<note>Ch. XII. &sect;.23.<lb/>
<note>Ch. XII. &sect;.23.<lb/>
Ch. <gap/><gap/><lb/>
<del>Ch. <gap/><gap/><lb/>
&sect;.12. <gap/><gap/><lb/>
&sect;.12. <gap/><gap/></del><lb/>
&sect;.20. Eventually-emendatory<lb/>
&sect;.20. Eventually-emendatory<lb/>
function</note>
function</note>
Line 18: Line 18:
these 4 pages.</p>
these 4 pages.</p>


<!-- The next 2 paras are deleted -->
<p><!-- This para is deleted -->&sect;.10. <hi rend="underline">Terms of Service</hi><lb/>
<p>&sect;.10. Terms of Service<lb/>
No Prime Minister is <gap/>igible, <gap/> there are in existence,<lb/>
No Prime Minister is <gap/>igible, <gap/> there are in existence,</p>
Art. 1. The terms of a <del><gap/></del> Minister's service is<lb/>
 
to <!-- blank --> choose of when <unclear>choice</unclear> may be made, three quondam Prime<lb/>
<p>Art. 1. The terms of a <gap/> Minister's service is<lb/>
to <!-- blank --> of when there may be made, three quondam Prime<lb/>
for life, <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> by any <gap/> of<lb/>
for life, <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> by any <gap/> of<lb/>
Ministers at the same time.<lb/>
Ministers at the same time.<lb/>
Line 31: Line 29:
Article 5 <gap/>?</note>
Article 5 <gap/>?</note>


<p>Art. 2. Art. To <gap/> be capable of recuring in manner following adoption<lb/>
<p>Art. 2. <del>Art.</del> To <del><gap/></del> be capable of <sic>recuring</sic> <add>in manner following</add> adoption<lb/>
by tacit adoption and consummation at the hands &sect;.14. of the<lb/>
by tacit <add>adoption and</add> consummation at the hands <del><add>&sect;.14.</add></del> of the<lb/>
Legislature, a proposed amendment must have come<lb/>
Legislature, a proposed amendment must have come<lb/>
from a Judge Immediate on in consequence of some<lb/>
from a Judge Immediate <del>on</del> in consequence of some<lb/>
particular suit instituted in his judicatory, or some application<lb/>
<add>particular</add> suit instituted in his judicatory, or some application<lb/>
made to him for the in open judicatory form some known applicant for<lb/>
made to him <del>for the</del> <add>in open judicatory</add> from some known applicant for<lb/>
this particular purpose without the institution of any suit: to wit<lb/>
this <add>particular</add> purpose without the institution of any suit: to wit<lb/>
as in case of an application for preinterpretation, in virtue<lb/>
as in case of an application for preinterpretation, in virtue<lb/>
of the last preceding section &#x2014; &sect;.11.</p>
of the last preceding section &#x2014; &sect;.11.</p>
Line 45: Line 43:
<p>Separate Sheet</p>
<p>Separate Sheet</p>


<p>Ratiocinative</p>
<p><hi rend="underline">Ratiocinative</hi></p>


<p>Rationale<lb/>
<p><del>Rationale</del><lb/>
Art. 3. Why require on this occasion, require, in all cases, the conjoint action of<lb/>
Art. 3. Why <del>require</del> <add>on this occasion, require, in all cases,</add> the conjunct action of<lb/>
a Judge Immediate and an individual at large applying<lb/>
a <hi rend="underline">Judge Immediate</hi> and an individual at large applying<lb/>
to him for this purpose as on the occasion of a suit?<lb/>
to him for this purpose as on the occasion of a suit?<lb/>
Why not give this power to be exercised either by a<lb/>
Why not give this power to be exercised either by a<lb/>
Judge Immediate or by his Superordinate the an Appellate Judge<lb/>
Judge <add>Immediate,</add> or by his Superordinate <del>the</del> an Appellate Judge<lb/>
or by the Justice Minister, each acting singly?</p>
or by the Justice Minister, each acting singly?</p>


<p>Answer Reasons.</p>
<p><del>Answer</del> Reasons.</p>


<p>1. <gap/> To ensure publicity, and prevent exclude any such<lb/>
<p>1. <del><gap/></del> To ensure publicity, and <del>prevent</del> <add>exclude</add> any such<lb/>
imperfectly considered Amendments as might be proposed by<lb/>
imperfectly considered Amendments as might be proposed by<lb/>
these functionaries respectively, if the power were allowed to of giving validity to a law<lb/>
these functionaries <del>respectively</del>, if the power <del>were allowed to</del> <add>of giving validity to a law</add><lb/>
so proposed by them respectively were allowed to be exercised by them at any time, without subm the proposition its having<lb/>
<add>so proposed by them respectively were allowed to</add> be exercised by them at any time, without <del>subm <add>the proposition</add></del> <add>its</add> having<lb/>
been submitted the proposition to the public eye.</p>
<add>been</add> submitted <del>the proposition</del> to the public eye.</p>


<p>2. An incident that seems little to be apprehended is &#x2014; that<lb/>
<p>2. An incident that seems little to be apprehended is &#x2014; that<lb/>
supposing the proposition reasonable, a Judge Immediate in whose breast it ha<lb/>
supposing the proposition reasonable, a Judge <add>Immediate</add> in whose breast it has<lb/>
originated should find any experience any difficulty in finding an<lb/>
originated should <del>find any</del> experience any difficulty in finding an<lb/>
individual to bring it forward: or that either a Judge Appellate<lb/>
individual to bring it forward: or that either a Judge Appellate<lb/>
or<lb/>
<add>or</add><lb/>
or the Justice Minister<lb/>
<note>or the Justice Minister<lb/>
should find experience any such difficulty<lb/>
should <del>find</del> <add>experience</add> any <del>such</del> difficulty<lb/>
in finding an individual<lb/>
in finding an individual<lb/>
to bring it forward<lb/>
to bring it forward<lb/>
before a Judge Immediate.</p>
before a Judge Immediate.</note></p>


<p>Art. 3.</p>
<note><add>Art. 3.</add></note>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 07:54, 13 January 2023

Click Here To Edit

1823. Septr. 25. 1825 Nov. 1
Constitutional Code. 1. Enactive Part.

+++ 2
2

Ch. XII. §.23.
Ch.
§.12.

§.20. Eventually-emendatory
function

Not for Netherlands
these 4 pages.

§.10. Terms of Service
No Prime Minister is igible, there are in existence,
Art. 1. The terms of a Minister's service is
to choose of when choice may be made, three quondam Prime
for life, by any of
Ministers at the same time.
the offi of , as per §.14.

Superseded this
Article 5 ?

Art. 2. Art. To be capable of recuring in manner following adoption
by tacit adoption and consummation at the hands §.14. of the
Legislature, a proposed amendment must have come
from a Judge Immediate on in consequence of some
particular suit instituted in his judicatory, or some application
made to him for the in open judicatory from some known applicant for
this particular purpose without the institution of any suit: to wit
as in case of an application for preinterpretation, in virtue
of the last preceding section — §.11.

Art. 3.

Separate Sheet

Ratiocinative

Rationale
Art. 3. Why require on this occasion, require, in all cases, the conjunct action of
a Judge Immediate and an individual at large applying
to him for this purpose as on the occasion of a suit?
Why not give this power to be exercised either by a
Judge Immediate, or by his Superordinate the an Appellate Judge
or by the Justice Minister, each acting singly?

Answer Reasons.

1. To ensure publicity, and prevent exclude any such
imperfectly considered Amendments as might be proposed by
these functionaries respectively, if the power were allowed to of giving validity to a law
so proposed by them respectively were allowed to be exercised by them at any time, without subm the proposition its having
been submitted the proposition to the public eye.

2. An incident that seems little to be apprehended is — that
supposing the proposition reasonable, a Judge Immediate in whose breast it has
originated should find any experience any difficulty in finding an
individual to bring it forward: or that either a Judge Appellate
or
or the Justice Minister
should find experience any such difficulty
in finding an individual
to bring it forward
before a Judge Immediate.

Art. 3.



Identifier: | JB/042/416/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-11-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

416

Info in main headings field

constitutional code i enactive part

Image

001

Titles

ratiocinative

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

[[page_numbering::d2 / e2 / f61[?]]]

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

"not for netherlands these 4 pages"

ID Number

13339

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in