JB/042/421/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/421/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1825 Nov. 22
<head>1825 Nov. 22<lb/>
Constitutional Code
Constitutional Code</head>


++ ++ 10
<note>++ ++ 10<lb/>
Copd
Cop<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/>
10
10</note>


Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
<note>Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/>
&sect;.20. Eventually emendative
&sect;.20. Eventually emendative<lb/>
function
function</note>


Individual Amendment proposers
<p>Individual Amendment proposers</p>


23 Nov &#9758; Compare this with &sect;. Eventually emendative
<p><del>23 Nov &#9758; Compare this with &sect;. Eventually emendative</del></p>


Not this time for
<note><unclear>Not</unclear> this time for<lb/>
the Netherlands.
the Netherlands.</note>


Enactive. Instructional
<p><hi rend="underline">Enactive. Instructional</hi><lb/>
Art. 25. Art. 22. In the exercise of this same eventually emendative
Art. 25. <del>Art. 22.</del> In the exercise of this same <hi rend="underline">eventually emendative</hi><lb/>
function, as well as in that of the melioration-suggestive function, the Judge
function, as <add>well as in that of</add> the <hi rend="underline">melioration-suggestive</hi> function, the Judge<lb/>
will have in consideration the question whether the local extent, to which
will have in consideration the <del>question whether the</del> <add><unclear>local</unclear></add> extent, <del>to</del> which<lb/>
it appears to him proper to be given, to the any regulation by him
it appears to him proper to be given, to <del>the</del> <add>any</add> regulation by him<lb/>
on that occasion proposed: whether the circumstances, by which the demand demand for
<add>on that occasion</add> proposed: whether the circumstances, by which the <del>demand</del> <add>demand</add> for<lb/>
it is constituted, are preventive to here contradictory, co<gap/>
it is constituted, are peculiar to his own territory, co<gap/><lb/>
to all the judicial <gap/> territories of the State, or peculiar to such <gap/>
to all the <add>judicial <del><gap/></del></add> territories of the State, or peculiar to such or such<lb/>
other territory or territories: <gap/><gap/><gap/> and <gap/> if these distinctions
<add>other</add> territory or territories: <del><gap/><gap/><gap/></del> and <del><gap/></del> <add>if these distinctions</add><lb/>
heard he will frame the <gap/> of the <gap/> bring to view in <gap/> Emendative suggestiong
<unclear>heard</unclear> he will <del>frame the <gap/> of the <gap/></del> <add>bring to view, in</add> <del><gap/> <add><gap/></add></del> <add><hi rend="underline">Emendation</hi>-</add> <hi rend="underline">suggesting</hi><lb/>
or Melioration-suggesting Report.
or <hi rend="underline">Melioration-suggesting Report</hi>.</p>


Instructional Enactive. Ratiocinative.
<p><hi rend="underline">Instructional <del>Enactive</del>. Ratiocinative.</hi><lb/>
Art. 26. Art. 23. On these occasions he will pay particular and separate
Art. 26. <del>Art. 23.</del> On these occasions he will pay <add>particular and</add> separate<lb/>
<gap/> attention to the subject field of Procedure: inasmuch as it
<del><gap/></del> attention to the <del>subject</del> <add>field</add> of Procedure: inasmuch as it<lb/>
is in this field more than in any other that incidents indicative of a demand emen for
is in this field <add>more than in any other</add> that incidents indicative of a demand <add>emen</add> for<lb/>
emendational or <gap/> additional <gap/> appellations will be apt to present themselves <note>to his notice.</note>
amendatment or <del><gap/></del> additional <del><gap/></del> <add>appellations</add> will be apt to present themselves <note>to his notice.</note></p>


Instructional
<p><hi rend="underline">Instructional</hi><lb/>
Art. 27. Art.  
Art. 27. Art. In these same distinctions <del><gap/></del> reference<lb/>
will moreover be made by the Judge Appellate, in <del><gap/></del> the<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Report</hi> made by him upon the Judge Immediate's <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline"><add>Emendation</add></hi><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline"><add>suggesting</add></hi> and <hi rend="underline">Melioration suggesting</hi> Reports.</p>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Instructional <del>Enactive</del></hi><lb/>
Art. 28. <del>Art. 24. 27.</del> So likewise the Justice Minister, <del><gap/></del><lb/>
in the Reports made by him <add>thereupon</add> to the Legislature.</p>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Enactive. Instructional</hi><lb/>
Art. 29. <del>Art. 28. Art. 25.</del> On the occasion of any such proposed amendments<lb/>
or new <del><gap/></del> regulations on the subject of procedure,<lb/>
the Justice Minister will have <add>special</add> regard to <del>conform</del> the demand<lb/>
for uniformity as in the case of <hi rend="underline">contested interpretations</hi> as<lb/>
per &sect;.19 <hi rend="underline">Contested-interpretation-reporting function</hi>: to the end<lb/>
that, in the particulars in question, uniformity and disuniformity.<lb/>
<del>that,</del> according to the demand for <del>them respectively uniformity<lb/>
or disuniformity</del> <add>these qualities <del><unclear>over the practical</unclear></del> respectively,</add> may, in the several judicial territories<lb/>
of the State, be made to have place.</p>





Revision as of 08:27, 17 January 2023

Click Here To Edit

1825 Nov. 22
Constitutional Code

++ ++ 10
Copd
10

Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.20. Eventually emendative
function

Individual Amendment proposers

23 Nov ☞ Compare this with §. Eventually emendative

Not this time for
the Netherlands.

Enactive. Instructional
Art. 25. Art. 22. In the exercise of this same eventually emendative
function, as well as in that of the melioration-suggestive function, the Judge
will have in consideration the question whether the local extent, to which
it appears to him proper to be given, to the any regulation by him
on that occasion proposed: whether the circumstances, by which the demand demand for
it is constituted, are peculiar to his own territory, co
to all the judicial territories of the State, or peculiar to such or such
other territory or territories: and if these distinctions
heard he will frame the of the bring to view, in Emendation- suggesting
or Melioration-suggesting Report.

Instructional Enactive. Ratiocinative.
Art. 26. Art. 23. On these occasions he will pay particular and separate
attention to the subject field of Procedure: inasmuch as it
is in this field more than in any other that incidents indicative of a demand emen for
amendatment or additional appellations will be apt to present themselves to his notice.

Instructional
Art. 27. Art. In these same distinctions reference
will moreover be made by the Judge Appellate, in the
Report made by him upon the Judge Immediate's Emendation
suggesting and Melioration suggesting Reports.

Instructional Enactive
Art. 28. Art. 24. 27. So likewise the Justice Minister,
in the Reports made by him thereupon to the Legislature.

Enactive. Instructional
Art. 29. Art. 28. Art. 25. On the occasion of any such proposed amendments
or new regulations on the subject of procedure,
the Justice Minister will have special regard to conform the demand
for uniformity as in the case of contested interpretations as
per §.19 Contested-interpretation-reporting function: to the end
that, in the particulars in question, uniformity and disuniformity.
that, according to the demand for them respectively uniformity
or disuniformity
these qualities over the practical respectively, may, in the several judicial territories
of the State, be made to have place.




Identifier: | JB/042/421/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-11-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

421

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

individual amendment-proposers / enactive - instructional / instructional - ratiocinative / enactive - instructional

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d10 / e10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

[[notes_public::"not this time for the netherlands" [note in jb's hand] "copd"]]

ID Number

13344

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in