JB/147/268/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/268/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/147/268/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/268/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/268/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->23 Feb. 1810<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head><del>Parl<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> Reform</del> Sinecures</head></p>
 
<p>Neither does it seem altogether clear that, if falshood<lb/>
 
there has been <add>was</add>, it has all been <add>was</add> on that side.</p>
 
<p><del>By</del> What may have been the case is that <del>by</del> some<lb/>
there may have been by whom abolition has <add>was</add> not apprehended <add>looked<lb/>
for</add> as a probably result.  <del>By</del> <add>In</add> those instances,<lb/>
in case of falshood, the falshood will naturally have <del>been</del><lb/>
presented itself in such a shape as to represent the emolument<lb/>
as less than it was in reality and this, for<lb/>
the purpose of averting jealousy and avoiding to draw<lb/>
upon the subject the eye of public scrutiny.</p>
<p>But <del>by</del> others there may have been by whom<lb/>
<del>the</del> abolition and thence compensation may have been<lb/>
regarded as probable consequences, and in proportion to the<lb/>
apparent magnitude of this probability would <add>might</add> be the<lb/>
temptation to give <unclear>as</unclear> falshood that shape the tendency<lb/>
of which would be to represent the emolument as being<lb/>
greater than it really was.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 06:27, 18 January 2023

Click Here To Edit

23 Feb. 1810
Parly Reform Sinecures

Neither does it seem altogether clear that, if falshood
there has been was, it has all been was on that side.

By What may have been the case is that by some
there may have been by whom abolition has was not apprehended looked
for
as a probably result. By In those instances,
in case of falshood, the falshood will naturally have been
presented itself in such a shape as to represent the emolument
as less than it was in reality and this, for
the purpose of averting jealousy and avoiding to draw
upon the subject the eye of public scrutiny.

But by others there may have been by whom
the abolition and thence compensation may have been
regarded as probable consequences, and in proportion to the
apparent magnitude of this probability would might be the
temptation to give as falshood that shape the tendency
of which would be to represent the emolument as being
greater than it really was.


Identifier: | JB/147/268/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-02-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

268

Info in main headings field

Sinecures

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C3

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

49493

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in