JB/042/430/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/430/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
and effect to it</note><lb/>
and effect to it</note><lb/>


S.13 <hi rend="underline">Sost<gap/> or Execution Staying function.</hi><lb/>
<p>S.13 <hi rend="underline">Sost<gap/> or Execution Staying function.</hi><lb/>
&#x2014;<lb/>
&#x2014;<lb/>
<p>(2)</p>
<p>(2)</p>
Line 39: Line 39:
<add>issuing of this last power the judge's <unclear>sestitive</unclear> or <del>expressed</del> executive</add><del>other b<gap/> will by the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> the terms</del><lb/>
<add>issuing of this last power the judge's <unclear>sestitive</unclear> or <del>expressed</del> executive</add><del>other b<gap/> will by the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> the terms</del><lb/>
<add>staying functions will <del>be exercised</del> have been exercised.</add> <del>of the proposed amendment inhibit intent in relation to the <gap/></del><lb/>
<add>staying functions will <del>be exercised</del> have been exercised.</add> <del>of the proposed amendment inhibit intent in relation to the <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>in question should have been the terms and im<gap/> of the line:</del><lb/>
<del>and to this labour he will add <gap/> is <gap/> aoo<gap/> the</del><lb/>
<del>correspondent imperative de<gap/> and to those succeed <gap/>imperative</del><lb/>
<del>decree <gap/> will add <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>or execution <gap/> decree, staying the <gap/> of <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>the above imperative has decree until the <gap/> will of the legislation</del><lb/>
shall <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></p>


<p>(1)</p>
<p>Art.4 <add><unclear>Sistens</unclear> or Execution - staying function.</add> Of an amendment proposed by a Judge, or few<lb/>
<del>&sect;.17</del> &sect;.16 a natural object will be <add>&#x2014;</add> <del>the</del> prevention of injustice, by<lb/>
<del>forbearing</del> stopping the operation of <del>some part</del><add>this is that</add> arrangement which<lb/>
though <add>(in this <del>no matter</del> or that shape,</add> pregnant with injustice, has <del>by</del><add>by means of</add> <del>by</del> some oversight, found its<lb/>
way into the Code.  To any such arrangement, should it happen<lb/>
to him, in the ordinary course of judicature, to be called upon to<lb/> 
give execution and effect, he may <del><gap/></del> and is expected to, <del><gap/> thing</del><lb/>
<del>his hand till the</del> forbear doing so, unless <add>and untill, after <del>except</del> of receiving as per</add> <del>f<gap/> <gap/> appropriate amendment</del><lb/>
<add>&sect;.14 an appropriate amendment</add> having for its object the clearing the code of the injustice the<lb/>
Legislature shall have <add>caused to be notified to have an express order</add> <del>expressly ordered and him</del> to give execution to the<lb/>
law as it stands.</p>





Revision as of 17:56, 18 January 2023

Click Here To Edit

1824. July 21

Constitional Code. CH. XII Judiciary collectively
S.17 Sisttive function

Art.1 Of an amendment
proposed by a Judge
anya material object
will be productive of
injustice - no matter
in what shape. Should
it so happen to a Judgethat being
to be applied to for giving
execution and effect to
a their fragment
besides proposing to the
appropriate amendment
it may stop and is
expected to stop the
giving such executive
and effect to it

S.13 Sost or Execution Staying function.

(2)

Art.2. In this case, he will proceed things. If at the when If supposed that
the <add>supposed</add> has tide<add> manifest</add> itself to his eyes, the whole of the evidence the supposed injunction of the law has not fully approved till
which the individual case, or stated by the Applicant <add><furnishes/add> has the body of order continuance of the evidence has been ted
been collected, he will issue, at <add>the once same time,</add>our three pair of decrees: one, and the such is ripe for the of it by the corresponding
for giving execution and effect in the law as it stands; a second for giving pair of shares he will proceed then instead
executive and effect to the law as <add>it will stand, if the </add> one case amendment, which he or use he will for two such p of desire: by
<add>thereupon proposes is adopted; a third for stopping the execution of
both, untake by the dearer the will of the Legislature
declaring his opinion the import of the
shall have been made a correspondent known. By the it stands, he will subjoin to it an ation
issuing of this last power the judge's sestitive or expressed executiveother b will by the the terms
staying functions will be exercised have been exercised. of the proposed amendment inhibit intent in relation to the
in question should have been the terms and im of the line:
and to this labour he will add is aoo the
correspondent imperative de and to those succeed imperative
decree will add
or execution decree, staying the of
the above imperative has decree until the will of the legislation

shall

(1)

Art.4 Sistens or Execution - staying function. Of an amendment proposed by a Judge, or few
§.17 §.16 a natural object will be the prevention of injustice, by
forbearing stopping the operation of some partthis is that arrangement which
though (in this no matter or that shape, pregnant with injustice, has byby means of by some oversight, found its
way into the Code. To any such arrangement, should it happen
to him, in the ordinary course of judicature, to be called upon to
give execution and effect, he may and is expected to, thing
his hand till the forbear doing so, unless and untill, after except of receiving as per f appropriate amendment
§.14 an appropriate amendment having for its object the clearing the code of the injustice the
Legislature shall have caused to be notified to have an express order expressly ordered and him to give execution to the
law as it stands.




Identifier: | JB/042/430/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1824-07-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

430

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

sistitive or execution staying function

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

"copd"

ID Number

13353

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in