JB/147/271/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/271/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/147/271/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/271/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/271/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->1 March 1810<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Sinecures</head></p>
 
<p>On the head of Sinecures, <add>in principle</add> one recommendation says the<lb/>
 
Committee of 1807 are the same with those of the Committee<lb/>
 
of 1797.</p>
<p>If this statement had been rigidly correct, the state <add>so much<lb/>
the better or at least so much the less bad for the people</add> of the information afforded on this head by the Committee<lb/>
of more recent date would have stood upon a footing<lb/>
less objectionable <add>exceptionable</add> than that on which it has been seen to<lb/>
stand.</p>
<p>In regard to the <add>matter of fact in question,</add> quantity of public money thus wasted<lb/>
upon each Sinecurist <add>placeman, the statement furnished by</add> the Committee of 1797 furnish<lb/>
<add>is in each instance</add> a clear and intelligible <add>one</add> statement in each instance:<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> and in <add>and</add> relative to this<lb/>
head the practice being<lb/>
uniform and expressible<lb/>
in general terms by one<lb/>
simple rule, may with<lb/>
indispensable propriety be<lb/>
said to be the result<lb/>
of principle.</note>  On<lb/>
the same subject the statement furnished by the Committee<lb/>
of 1807 is <add>as high above bar <unclear>one</unclear></add> not so <add>clear or intelligible</add> in any an instance:<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> &#9758; <gap/> incompleatness of the list</note> so that <add>as the<lb/>
contrary</add> in this which I so <del>much</del> far as concerns matter of fact<lb/>
is the main head <del>to</del> <add>of the whole enquiry</add> parliament and those at whose expence<lb/>
this waste is made <add>by this second Committee which set about the work with the advantage of having the ground made by the former <del>one</del> to build upon</add> are either kept or thrown back into<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add>and</add> at any rate left altogether in the dark.</p>
<p>In regard to matter of opinion and recommendation<lb/>
there indeed <add>in point of principle the agreement</add> it is that the coincidence between the two Committees<lb/>
is unfortunately but <del><gap/></del> too <add>correctly</add> true.  <del>By the</del></p>
<p>By the earlier of <add>the body</add> these two bodies of national<lb/>
advisers whether <add><del><gap/></del> unprincipled</add> depredation shall <del><gap/></del> or shall<lb/>
not continue to insult the people in this shape is<lb/>
treated and left as a matter of indifference:  and with <add>in the<lb/>
same <del>high</del> state of</add> the same indifference is it left by this later body<lb/>
of national advisers after the ten years which they had<lb/>
had to reflect <add>for reflection</add> on its former mass of documents, and the<lb/>
powers by which <del>for</del> whatsoever <del>purpose</del> <add>may have been the purpose</add> actually in view in the<lb/>
giving of them, they might have <del>thrown</del> employed in giving <add>throwing</add> light as well<lb/>
as <add>giving</add> extent to the information
collected in this head<lb/>
by their predecessors, but<lb/>
<del>by which of which</del> of the<lb/>
exercise of which, as hath<lb/>
been seen the result is<lb/>
fresh darkness thrown<lb/>
upon the <gap/> of this vast deep <add>those bitter waters</add>.
</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:41, 19 January 2023

Click Here To Edit

1 March 1810
Sinecures

On the head of Sinecures, in principle one recommendation says the
Committee of 1807 are the same with those of the Committee
of 1797.

If this statement had been rigidly correct, the state so much
the better or at least so much the less bad for the people
of the information afforded on this head by the Committee
of more recent date would have stood upon a footing
less objectionable exceptionable than that on which it has been seen to
stand.

In regard to the matter of fact in question, quantity of public money thus wasted
upon each Sinecurist placeman, the statement furnished by the Committee of 1797 furnish
is in each instance a clear and intelligible one statement in each instance: and in and relative to this
head the practice being
uniform and expressible
in general terms by one
simple rule, may with
indispensable propriety be
said to be the result
of principle.
On
the same subject the statement furnished by the Committee
of 1807 is as high above bar one not so clear or intelligible in any an instance: incompleatness of the list so that as the
contrary
in this which I so much far as concerns matter of fact
is the main head to of the whole enquiry parliament and those at whose expence
this waste is made by this second Committee which set about the work with the advantage of having the ground made by the former one to build upon are either kept or thrown back into
and at any rate left altogether in the dark.

In regard to matter of opinion and recommendation
there indeed in point of principle the agreement it is that the coincidence between the two Committees
is unfortunately but too correctly true. By the

By the earlier of the body these two bodies of national
advisers whether unprincipled depredation shall or shall
not continue to insult the people in this shape is
treated and left as a matter of indifference: and with in the
same high state of
the same indifference is it left by this later body
of national advisers after the ten years which they had
had to reflect for reflection on its former mass of documents, and the
powers by which for whatsoever purpose may have been the purpose actually in view in the
giving of them, they might have thrown employed in giving throwing light as well
as giving extent to the information collected in this head
by their predecessors, but
by which of which of the
exercise of which, as hath
been seen the result is
fresh darkness thrown
upon the of this vast deep those bitter waters.


Identifier: | JB/147/271/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-03-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

271

Info in main headings field

Sinecures

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

49496

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in