JB/147/403/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/403/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/147/403/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/403/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/403/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->10 March 1810</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>One difficulty with <add>against</add> which the powers of <del><gap/></del> Honourable<lb/>
 
Gentlemen have had to struggle <add>contend</add> with, and over which they</p>
 
have not always been victorious is that which attends</p>
 
the distinguishing the two correlative and unhappily</p>
for the public <add>us</add> as well as for them but too closely <add>intimately</add> connected</p>
objects – viz. the officer and the office.</p>
<p>Entities of the real class and entities of the fictitious</p>
class are objects in themselves <add>in a considerable degree</add> considerably different and</p>
yet in the conceptions or at any rate in the language of mankind</p>
in practice as found them but too frequently confounded.</p>
<add>By <gap/> eye has courage to endure the sight</add> Confluence of the sort may be seen <del>by <add>in</add> the eye</del>  on very delicate ground</p>
and such is the case here.</p>
<p><add>Amont real entities</add> The distinction between a <hi rend="underline">person</hi> and a <hi rend="underline">thing</hi> is a</p>
distinction of which M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Justice Blackstone has professed</p>
himself to be aware:  but having copied it from <add>one of</add> the scribes</p>
of Justinian <add>Justinian's <del><gap/></del> scribes</add>, instead of looking for in the nature of the</p>
case, the view he takes of it is unfortunately none of</p>
the clearest.  That a <hi rend="underline">person</hi> is that sort of being which <add>who</add></p>
is capable of possessing rights, and of <add>as well as</add> making a good</p>
or bad use of them, or a truth that stands beyond <add>placed above</add></p>
dispute:  and if this would have <unclear>contented</unclear> the learned</p>
Commentator, there would have been neither need nor occasion</p>
for mentioning him here.  But not content with</p>
the allotment which in one of his books he has made of</p>
rights to persons, he adds another book in which with</p>
equal liberality he makes one allowance <add>and</add> in the same</p>
shape to things.  The <unclear>notions</unclear> <unclear>suited</unclear> <unclear>charge</unclear> so well <del><gap/></del></p>
"That which was <del><gap/></del> which he could not tell."  <add>In this case</add> Such as between things</p>
and things was the case with Sir Hudibras:  and <add>in this same case</add> such  as between</p>
things and persons was the case with Sir William Blackstone.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:51, 31 January 2023

Click Here To Edit

10 March 1810

One difficulty with against which the powers of Honourable
Gentlemen have had to struggle contend with, and over which they

have not always been victorious is that which attends

the distinguishing the two correlative and unhappily

for the public us as well as for them but too closely intimately connected

objects – viz. the officer and the office.

Entities of the real class and entities of the fictitious

class are objects in themselves in a considerable degree considerably different and

yet in the conceptions or at any rate in the language of mankind

in practice as found them but too frequently confounded.

By eye has courage to endure the sight Confluence of the sort may be seen by in the eye on very delicate ground

and such is the case here.

Amont real entities The distinction between a person and a thing is a

distinction of which Mr Justice Blackstone has professed

himself to be aware: but having copied it from one of the scribes

of Justinian Justinian's scribes, instead of looking for in the nature of the

case, the view he takes of it is unfortunately none of

the clearest. That a person is that sort of being which who

is capable of possessing rights, and of as well as making a good

or bad use of them, or a truth that stands beyond placed above

dispute: and if this would have contented the learned

Commentator, there would have been neither need nor occasion

for mentioning him here. But not content with

the allotment which in one of his books he has made of

rights to persons, he adds another book in which with

equal liberality he makes one allowance and in the same

shape to things. The notions suited charge so well

"That which was which he could not tell." In this case Such as between things

and things was the case with Sir Hudibras: and in this same case such as between

things and persons was the case with Sir William Blackstone.


Identifier: | JB/147/403/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-03-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

403

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C1

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

49628

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in