JB/147/461/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:57, 5 February 2023

9 Feby 1810
Parly Reform Sinecures

Next to the head of "Sinecures and Offices executed
wholly wholly or chiefly by Deputy", comes the head of
"Offices executed by Deputy".

Under this head the first observation made is –
that "Offices executed wholly or chiefly by Deputy"
(for here we come back to the first expression) "should" –
what? what is it that should be done with them?
the emolument of those reduced to that quantum which
the acceptance of it by the Deputy shows a sufficient, and thence to be the proper
one? – No: – but "with as much regard to economy
as the Public Service will admitt"" a proposition
the more unexceptionable in that the most determinate insatiable
public money swallower dissipator would

Identifier: \| JB/147/461/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.
Date_1	1810-02-09	Marginal Summary Numbering	7
Box	147	Main Headings	Sinecures
Folio number	461	Info in main headings field	Sine Cures
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	D5
Penner		Watermarks	TH 1806
Marginals	Jeremy Bentham	Paper Producer	Andre Morellet
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1806
Notes public		ID Number	49686
Box Contents

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/147/461/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
+<p><!-- pencil -->9 Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1810<lb/>
-''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
+<!-- pencil --><head><del>Parl<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> Reform</del> Sinecures</head></p>
+<p>Next to the head of "Sinecures and Offices executed<lb/>
+wholly wholly or chiefly by Deputy", comes the head of<lb/>
+"Offices executed by Deputy".</p>
+<p>Under this head the first observation made is –<lb/>
+that "Offices executed wholly or chiefly by Deputy"<lb/>
+(for here we come back to the first expression) "should" –<lb/>
+what?  what is it that should be done with them?<lb/>
+the emolument of those reduced to that quantum which<lb/>
+the acceptance of it by the Deputy shows <add>a sufficient, and thence</add> to be the proper<lb/>
+one? – No: – but "with as much regard to economy<lb/>
+as the Public Service will admitt""  a proposition<lb/>
+the more unexceptionable in that the most determinate <add><unclear>insatiable</unclear><lb/>
+public money swallower</add> dissipator would
+</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}{{Untranscribed}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Views

JB/147/461/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:57, 5 February 2023

Navigation

Search