JB/096/140/001

Click Here To Edit

Two offences are proposed — + + come in question One I am a Legislator. I wishes to
know which of them is the greatest — Why? that in
order to know to know which to punish most —
This is one reason —
But punishing of an offence (I mean, the
offence itself that is become obnoxious is seen to do the mischief) is but one
was means of preventing it - there are
other means, as we have seen already under
the title of Indirect Legislation — These
others therefore are so many other reasons;
all coming however under the general reason
of Prevention.

In the same manner of any two offences that
can be proposed one may wishes may wish to know which
is the greatest — Now that is the greatest offence
which produce the greatest most mischief; that is the greatest mischief which contains (taken together) the most pain and danger. which produces most pain and danger
to know then therefore which [of any number of offences]
produces the greatest mischief, one must know which of them produces the most pain and danger, to know which of them produces the most pain and danger, one must first know
the pain and danger that each of them produces.
What need of more repetitions? If I have stand
a chance of being under a pain of sufferance
I am in danger — If I stand a chance
of being under a pain of expectation, I
am in danger.

Identifier: | JB/096/140/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	096	Main Headings	legislation
Folio number	140	Info in main headings field	aestimation sect. i three orders of mischief
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	31144
Box Contents