JB/091/066/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/091/066/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/091/066/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/066/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/066/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->1 Febr<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>To the plaintiff, <del>in a Court</del> (it not being a case of appeal)<lb/>
 
belongs the choice as between Court and Court.  The<lb/>
 
plaintiff is in the great majority of causes in the right,<lb/>
 
<add>(wishing for relief rather than for vengeance)</add> or, what to this purpose comes to the same thing, thinks himself<lb/>
so.  The plaintiff therefore, if he be <del>at <gap/></del> <add>judiciously as well as</add> honestly<lb/>
advised, will <del><gap/></del> supply to that one of <del>the</del> Two Courts in<lb/>
which the security against misdecision is <del>the greatest</del> to<lb/>
appearance the greatest, and, <add>if there be any difference,</add> the probable quantity of inconvenience<lb/>
in the shape of delay, vexation and expence, the least.<lb/>
If he be honestly advised – that is if his adviser the Attorney<lb/>
the Writer to the <gap/>, prefers <del>the</del> his Client's interest to his own<lb/>
profit and convenience.  But is it always so certain that he<lb/>
will do so?  He is better acquainted <add>more at home</add> with the practice and the<lb/>
<unclear>practisers</unclear> in the <unclear>worse</unclear> conducted than in the <unclear>better</unclear> conducted<lb/>
Court:  he has particular connections among the Advocates at<lb/>
the one Court, and not at the other Court:  and so on <add>forth</add>.</p>
<p>If he be judiciously advised – that is <del>if <add>his advisor</add> the Attorney be<lb/>
a <unclear>competent</unclear> Judge</del> if the estimate formed by the Attorney of<lb/>
the comparatively probability of good judicature as between<lb/>
Court and Court, in respect of the <add>several</add> qualifications possessed by the<lb/>
several Judges, but more particularly <del>of</del> by the presiding Judge,<lb/>
be correct:  but will it be so? – Without entering into <add>Not to <del>enter</del> engage in any such<lb/>
so endless a task as that</add> the task of forming a list of judicial endowments, with a view <add>an estimate</add><lb/>
of their comparative importance, the advantage which, <del>brilliancy<lb/>
or <gap/></del> on this as well as so many other occasions, brilliancy<lb/>
is so apt to obtain over <unclear>solidiity</unclear> is sufficiently notorious.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:22, 17 February 2023

Click Here To Edit

1 Febry 1807

To the plaintiff, in a Court (it not being a case of appeal)
belongs the choice as between Court and Court. The
plaintiff is in the great majority of causes in the right,
(wishing for relief rather than for vengeance) or, what to this purpose comes to the same thing, thinks himself
so. The plaintiff therefore, if he be at judiciously as well as honestly
advised, will supply to that one of the Two Courts in
which the security against misdecision is the greatest to
appearance the greatest, and, if there be any difference, the probable quantity of inconvenience
in the shape of delay, vexation and expence, the least.
If he be honestly advised – that is if his adviser the Attorney
the Writer to the , prefers the his Client's interest to his own
profit and convenience. But is it always so certain that he
will do so? He is better acquainted more at home with the practice and the
practisers in the worse conducted than in the better conducted
Court: he has particular connections among the Advocates at
the one Court, and not at the other Court: and so on forth.

If he be judiciously advised – that is if his advisor the Attorney be
a competent Judge
if the estimate formed by the Attorney of
the comparatively probability of good judicature as between
Court and Court, in respect of the several qualifications possessed by the
several Judges, but more particularly of by the presiding Judge,
be correct: but will it be so? – Without entering into Not to enter engage in any such
so endless a task as that
the task of forming a list of judicial endowments, with a view an estimate
of their comparative importance, the advantage which, brilliancy
or
on this as well as so many other occasions, brilliancy
is so apt to obtain over solidiity is sufficiently notorious.


Identifier: | JB/091/066/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1807-02-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 11 - or 13

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

066

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

29062

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in