JB/091/147/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/091/147/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/091/147/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/147/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/147/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->26 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1807<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>To L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Grenville</head></p>
 
<p>Talk <add>to a lawyer</add> of chicane in this term or any other, if it <add>to<lb/>
 
his view it be</add> bee too gross to be defended, he looks indignant – Is there<lb/>
 
any man of character meaning an Attorney (for <del>the</del> as<lb/>
<add>matters are arranged,</add> reproach never <unclear>mounts</unclear> higher) is there a man of character<lb/>
that would lend himself to such a business?</p>
<p>Men of character indeed Sir –<lb/>
In the first place – are there men that are men not of<lb/>
character.  Are there not two classes? one whose business<lb/>
depends upon the reprobation of probity, another whose<lb/>
business depends upon the opposite species of repute?<lb/>
Men <add>principally at least</add> for the use of bonâ fide, the other <add><del>for</del></add> for the use of malâ<lb/>
fide suitors.  Are these not Houses of <unclear>cake</unclear> for Attornies <del>not</del><lb/>
of <del>character</del> evil fame as for females.</p>
<p>In the next place what is there in character that should<lb/>
prevent these things.  Is it for Attorney <add>the Attorney</add> to refuse to his<lb/>
client those advantages – any of those advantages – which<lb/>
are held out to him by Judges?  Are not Judges men<lb/>
of character?  The Attorneys by whose assistance malâ<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> fide Defendants to the number of 600 in a year,<lb/>
should if the <add>confessedly</add> just demands of their respective Plaintiffs – each<lb/>
of them for a year in the Exchequer Chamber alone, were<lb/>
they none of them men of character.  L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Kenyon who<lb/>
made his £1,700 a year by the sale of the delay, was<lb/>
not he a man of character?  The <add>noble Lord and</add> learned
successor of L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Kenyon, the noble Lord will <unclear>alone</unclear> Your Lordship<lb/>
have the felicity of spending <add>passing</add> so <unclear>many</unclear> convivial hours, is not he<lb/>
a man of character?  Would he be the less so, should it turn out,<lb/>
– (I <del>am sure I know all that it would be pr</del> mean only to put a case)<lb/>
that he is in possession of drawing still more than L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Kenyon did from the<lb/>
same source, would he be the less of a man of character?  Would the<lb/>
satisfaction Your Lordship is deriving from his society be less pure?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:57, 20 February 2023

Click Here To Edit

26 Jany 1807
To Ld Grenville

Talk to a lawyer of chicane in this term or any other, if it to
his view it be
bee too gross to be defended, he looks indignant – Is there
any man of character meaning an Attorney (for the as
matters are arranged, reproach never mounts higher) is there a man of character
that would lend himself to such a business?

Men of character indeed Sir –
In the first place – are there men that are men not of
character. Are there not two classes? one whose business
depends upon the reprobation of probity, another whose
business depends upon the opposite species of repute?
Men principally at least for the use of bonâ fide, the other for for the use of malâ
fide suitors. Are these not Houses of cake for Attornies not
of character evil fame as for females.

In the next place what is there in character that should
prevent these things. Is it for Attorney the Attorney to refuse to his
client those advantages – any of those advantages – which
are held out to him by Judges? Are not Judges men
of character? The Attorneys by whose assistance malâ
fide Defendants to the number of 600 in a year,
should if the confessedly just demands of their respective Plaintiffs – each
of them for a year in the Exchequer Chamber alone, were
they none of them men of character. Ld Kenyon who
made his £1,700 a year by the sale of the delay, was
not he a man of character? The noble Lord and learned successor of Ld Kenyon, the noble Lord will alone Your Lordship
have the felicity of spending passing so many convivial hours, is not he
a man of character? Would he be the less so, should it turn out,
– (I am sure I know all that it would be pr mean only to put a case)
that he is in possession of drawing still more than Ld Kenyon did from the
same source, would he be the less of a man of character? Would the
satisfaction Your Lordship is deriving from his society be less pure?


Identifier: | JB/091/147/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1807-01-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

1

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

147

Info in main headings field

to ld grenville

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

29143

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in