JB/091/031/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/091/031/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/091/031/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/031/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/031/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->18 July 1806<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Scotch Reform</head></p>
 
<p>From the effect <add>with</add> which the proposed and any <add>like every</add> other plan of reform<lb/>
 
will have <add>would operate</add> upon the passive faculties of the man of<lb/>
 
law, upon those faculties <add>parts of his <gap/> by which he enjoys or suffers</add><lb/>
law, follows the effect it will <add>cannot</add> but produce upon his <add>intellectual</add> active<lb/>
faculties – upon those faculties from <add>by</add> which <add>on which any useful</add> advice and <add>or</add> assistance<lb/>
that could be looked to from that quarter would find their source.</p>
<p>No my Lord – of all the learned persons to whom on<lb/>
a subject in which no superiority of talent can place a man above the need the continued need of advice<lb/>
this occasion Your Lordship has looked to<lb/>
there is not one <del>who by</del> whose <del>the</del> interests, prejudices and<lb/>
habits of his whole professional life do not urge <add>engage</add> him to<lb/>
deceive you, do not impose on him the necessity of doing<lb/>
what depends on him by <add>in the way of</add> advice, by <add>in the way of</add> information<lb/>
towards rendering the plan abortive.</p>
<p>Between the official lawyer and the professional lawyer<lb/>
though <add>in this respect</add> there is certainly some difference, yet there is not<lb/>
difference enough to prevent them from acting on the same side<lb/>
I suppose indemnification:  indemnification carried as far<lb/>
as the nature of the case will suffer it to go.  Observe then<lb/>
the situation of the official lawyer.  The men that may<lb/>
be indemnified – compleatly indemnified – {may and<lb/>
will <del>are not</del> will never be understood to be quite synonymous)<lb/>
nor himself and his colleagues:  the men that can not be<lb/>
indemnified are his familiar <add>among his most dearest intimate</add> friends:  friends in all the<lb/>
shades and vanities <add>degrees</add> of friendship, companions from youth<lb/>
upwards – dependents relations looking up to him for countenance<lb/>
and patronage.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 00:43, 21 February 2023

Click Here To Edit

18 July 1806
Scotch Reform

From the effect with which the proposed and any like every other plan of reform
will have would operate upon the passive faculties of the man of
law, upon those faculties parts of his by which he enjoys or suffers
law, follows the effect it will cannot but produce upon his intellectual active
faculties – upon those faculties from by which on which any useful advice and or assistance
that could be looked to from that quarter would find their source.

No my Lord – of all the learned persons to whom on
a subject in which no superiority of talent can place a man above the need the continued need of advice
this occasion Your Lordship has looked to
there is not one who by whose the interests, prejudices and
habits of his whole professional life do not urge engage him to
deceive you, do not impose on him the necessity of doing
what depends on him by in the way of advice, by in the way of information
towards rendering the plan abortive.

Between the official lawyer and the professional lawyer
though in this respect there is certainly some difference, yet there is not
difference enough to prevent them from acting on the same side
I suppose indemnification: indemnification carried as far
as the nature of the case will suffer it to go. Observe then
the situation of the official lawyer. The men that may
be indemnified – compleatly indemnified – {may and
will are not will never be understood to be quite synonymous)
nor himself and his colleagues: the men that can not be
indemnified are his familiar among his most dearest intimate friends: friends in all the
shades and vanities degrees of friendship, companions from youth
upwards – dependents relations looking up to him for countenance
and patronage.


Identifier: | JB/091/031/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1806-07-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

031

Info in main headings field

scotch reform

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

29027

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in