★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1824. July 13<lb/>Constitutional Code.</head> <!-- numbers in pencil --> <p><note>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/>I<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> | <head>1824. July 13<lb/>Constitutional Code.</head> <!-- numbers in pencil --> <p><note>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/>I<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic>XII Judiciary collectively</note><lb/>(4) (7 <note>§ <sic>Preinterpretative</sic> function</note></p> <p>Objection. The consummate power being then added to<lb/>the <gap/>, the <sic>compleat</sic> power of Legislation is thus<lb/><del>add</del> given to the Judiciary. Answer. Yes. <del>but</del> <add>were it not</add> for the negative<lb/>reserved to the Legislature, and the constant and express call upon<lb/>that authority for the attention to the subject. But the fact <add>truth</add><lb/>is — that by the <del>p</del> here proposed institution the power of Judges,<lb/>so far from being <sic>encreased</sic>, is <unclear>suffused</unclear>: and this was accordingly<lb/><del>one of the objects</del> <add>one principal object</add> in view. In general <del>the Judges do what</del> <add><del>no <gap/> to law</del> the Judge or Judges who are</add><lb/><del>they please, they legislate no effect and the end has <gap/> the</del> <add>they by/and do on every <del>in effect</del> occasion whatsoever/exactly what they please: whatsoever happens to be most in accordance<lb/>with their own<lb/>sinister interests, sinister<lb/>Associations and interest-together<lb/>prejudices. in effect they act as</add><lb/><del><gap/> of legislation the power they exercise is still left</del> <add>legislators, and without any of those checks which apply to Legislators:</add><lb/><del>clearly <gap/> than that of the Legislature. On this point</del> <add><del>exactly</del> They do exactly as they please, and whatever it is <del>the here proposed</del> </add><lb/><add>that they do never does the Legislature bestow <del>any</del> upon it so much as a<lb/>thought. Yes if any influential member of the Legislature sees his own particular <!-- continues into the margin --> interest advantageously<lb/>affected by it:<lb/>for in that case there<lb/>would be <gap/> enough:<lb/><del>but so long as any such<lb/>effect escaped observation</del><lb/>but except any effect<lb/>of this sort happens to be<lb/>described — and no one<lb/>has any leisure be lost<lb/>for it, the fate of the people <del>are</del> is<lb/><del>left</del> without recourse<lb/>left to the mercy of<lb/>their necessary and<lb/>ever implacable<lb/>enemies. On the here<lb/>proposed plan</add><lb/>nothing could ever have the force of law that had not been presented<lb/>in <gap/> to the eyes of the Legislature: <del>at the same time</del><lb/><del>the <gap/></del> <add>yet</add> a vast quantity of time, which, in the case of <add>an <gap/> of</add> <del><gap/></del><lb/><add>proposed law</add> proposed to the Legislature by miscellaneous <del><gap/></del> and <add><del>less</del></add> inexperienced<lb/>or less experienced hands, would by the expedient of entering silence<lb/><del>non-<gap/></del> <add>non-rejection</add> for adoption, be saved.</p> <p>Under the French Charter which <add>in</add> the Constitutional branch<lb/>of law <add>stands</add> excluded from all chance of <gap/>, and condemned<lb/>to an endless course of <gap/> <!-- brackets in pencil --> [<del>by the exclusive possession of the</del> <add><sic>till</sic> it reaches over more than</add><lb/><del>given to the King in regard to the <gap/></del> <add>bottom of the abyss of despotism, penal and</add> the civil branch is <add>by the same cause</add><lb/>in some <del>part</del> <add>degree</add> preserved from <gap/> and confusion. This<lb/>cause is the confining to the King that initiative which in England<lb/><del>every Member</del> belongs of right to every Member of <del>Go</del>the Legislature.</p> <!-- marginal summaries in pencil. First two paragraphs crossed through in pencil --> <p><note>14. Objection. <del>Added</del> <add>discussion</add><lb/><del><gap/></del> <add> being thus added</add> to the <gap/>:<lb/>the <sic>compleat</sic> power of<lb/>legislation is given to the<lb/>Judiciary.</note></p> <p><note>Answer. No. Yes: but<lb/>for the Legislature's negative<lb/>and the <sic>compleat</sic> and<lb/>express call <del><gap/></del> for its<lb/>attention: and the other<lb/>negatives as above.</note></p> <p><note>16. Use. Checking the arbitrary<lb/>power in the hands<lb/>of Judges. <del>In general</del> <add><foreign>Anglicé</foreign>, partly</add> for<lb/>want of the legislative attention<lb/>being called to<lb/>these proceedings, <del>they do</del> <add>a Judge</add><lb/>on each occasion doing whatever<lb/>best suits his <add>particular</add> interests<lb/>or <add>interest — by other</add> prejudice: no member<lb/>of the Legislature bestowing a<lb/>thought on it, unless <add>where</add> his own<lb/>particular interest, in some<lb/>shape or other presents itself<lb/>as being affected: [+]<lb/><!-- marginals continue along the bottom third of the page -->[+] Thence are the people left at the mercy<lb/>of these their necessary and ever implacable<lb/>enemies.</note></p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p><note>1<del>5</del>7. Use. <del>Saving <gap/></del> <add>Lessening the</add> time consumed<lb/> <foreign>Anglicé</foreign> by the part taken in<lb/>Legislation by miscellaneous and absolute<lb/>or comparatively inexperienced hands.</note></p> <p><note>1<del>6</del>8. Use. <del>Saving</del> Lessening the <gap/>,<lb/>intricacy, <sic>voluminousness</sic><lb/>and confusion produced by that<lb/>same cause.</note></p> <p><note>19. <foreign>Gallice</foreign> by the confining the initiation<lb/>to the Kings instruments,<lb/>though vastly preponderant evil is produced,<lb/>still the evil from those two<lb/>sources are lessened.</note></p> | ||
1824. July 13
Constitutional Code.
2o
I
Ch.XII Judiciary collectively
(4) (7 § Preinterpretative function
Objection. The consummate power being then added to
the , the compleat power of Legislation is thus
add given to the Judiciary. Answer. Yes. but were it not for the negative
reserved to the Legislature, and the constant and express call upon
that authority for the attention to the subject. But the fact truth
is — that by the p here proposed institution the power of Judges,
so far from being encreased, is suffused: and this was accordingly
one of the objects one principal object in view. In general the Judges do what no to law the Judge or Judges who are
they please, they legislate no effect and the end has the they by/and do on every in effect occasion whatsoever/exactly what they please: whatsoever happens to be most in accordance
with their own
sinister interests, sinister
Associations and interest-together
prejudices. in effect they act as
of legislation the power they exercise is still left legislators, and without any of those checks which apply to Legislators:
clearly than that of the Legislature. On this point exactly They do exactly as they please, and whatever it is the here proposed
that they do never does the Legislature bestow any upon it so much as a
thought. Yes if any influential member of the Legislature sees his own particular interest advantageously
affected by it:
for in that case there
would be enough:
but so long as any such
effect escaped observation
but except any effect
of this sort happens to be
described — and no one
has any leisure be lost
for it, the fate of the people are is
left without recourse
left to the mercy of
their necessary and
ever implacable
enemies. On the here
proposed plan
nothing could ever have the force of law that had not been presented
in to the eyes of the Legislature: at the same time
the yet a vast quantity of time, which, in the case of an of
proposed law proposed to the Legislature by miscellaneous and less inexperienced
or less experienced hands, would by the expedient of entering silence
non- non-rejection for adoption, be saved.
Under the French Charter which in the Constitutional branch
of law stands excluded from all chance of , and condemned
to an endless course of [by the exclusive possession of the till it reaches over more than
given to the King in regard to the bottom of the abyss of despotism, penal and the civil branch is by the same cause
in some part degree preserved from and confusion. This
cause is the confining to the King that initiative which in England
every Member belongs of right to every Member of Gothe Legislature.
14. Objection. Added discussion
being thus added to the :
the compleat power of
legislation is given to the
Judiciary.
Answer. No. Yes: but
for the Legislature's negative
and the compleat and
express call for its
attention: and the other
negatives as above.
16. Use. Checking the arbitrary
power in the hands
of Judges. In general Anglicé, partly for
want of the legislative attention
being called to
these proceedings, they do a Judge
on each occasion doing whatever
best suits his particular interests
or interest — by other prejudice: no member
of the Legislature bestowing a
thought on it, unless where his own
particular interest, in some
shape or other presents itself
as being affected: [+]
[+] Thence are the people left at the mercy
of these their necessary and ever implacable
enemies.
157. Use. Saving Lessening the time consumed
Anglicé by the part taken in
Legislation by miscellaneous and absolute
or comparatively inexperienced hands.
168. Use. Saving Lessening the ,
intricacy, voluminousness
and confusion produced by that
same cause.
19. Gallice by the confining the initiation
to the Kings instruments,
though vastly preponderant evil is produced,
still the evil from those two
sources are lessened.
Identifier: | JB/042/448/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1824-07-13 |
not numbered |
||
042 |
constitutional code |
||
448 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c4 / e7 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
1824 |
|||
13371 |
|||