★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/091/284/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/284/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/091/284/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->26 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1808</p> | |||
<p>Here then for the purpose of causing men to be put<lb/> | |||
to death, <add>for this purpose</add> all men without distinction, the most ignorant<lb/> | |||
included <add>not excepted</add> are supposed <add>not only</add> to be apprized of the existence of<lb/> | |||
the law by which the being thus dealt with is made<lb/> | |||
the consequence of the act of <hi rend="underline"><unclear>cutting</unclear></hi> accompanied with<lb/> | |||
the bad intentions therein described – apprized of its existence,<lb/> | |||
and to the effect in question – apprized of the meaning<lb/> | |||
of the several words <add>by which it stands expressed</add> of which it is composed, the words<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">cut</hi> and <hi rend="underline">cutting</hi> among the rest. But when for the<lb/> | |||
purpose of sitting in judgment on an accusation charging<lb/> | |||
a man with having committed <del>this</del> forbidden act of this<lb/> | |||
description, a man of a class superior <add>superior to the bulk of the community</add> in point <add>respect</add> of<lb/> | |||
condition of life and the portion of knowledge naturally<lb/> | |||
attached to it, and on account of such <add>presumed</add> superiority<lb/> | |||
selected, is placed in the situation of a Judge, then<lb/> | |||
it is that because he is not <add>not being</add> a <del><gap/></del> professionally<lb/> | |||
bred lawyer <add>Judge</add>, he is regarded by those who are professionally<lb/> | |||
bred judges, as a man incapable of understanding<lb/> | |||
and not fit to be trusted with pronouncing what it<lb/> | |||
is that <hi rend="underline">cutting</hi> is <add>the words cut and cutting mean</add>. That the individual accused has<lb/> | |||
been guilty of offending against this law by which on pain<lb/> | |||
of death the act of cutting is when accompanied with the<lb/> | |||
evil intentions in question made a capital offence is what<lb/> | |||
they are <add>indeed</add> permitted to decide: but the act of <add>word</add> <hi rend="underline">cutting</hi> being<lb/> | |||
one <add>of the number</add> of the words employed in the law, and the question<lb/> | |||
concerning the import of it being accordingly a question<lb/> | |||
of law, and professionally bred lawyers the only persons capable <add>qualified</add><lb/> | |||
of understanding <add>to decide on</add> questions of law, and the Jurymen none of them<lb/> | |||
professionally bred lawyers thence it is that their having pronounced<lb/> | |||
the accused guilty of the act of <hi rend="underline">cutting</hi> accompanied with<lb/> | |||
the evil intentions in question is not a sufficient warrant for <del><gap/></del> decreeing him guilty.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} |
26 Jany 1808
Here then for the purpose of causing men to be put
to death, for this purpose all men without distinction, the most ignorant
included not excepted are supposed not only to be apprized of the existence of
the law by which the being thus dealt with is made
the consequence of the act of cutting accompanied with
the bad intentions therein described – apprized of its existence,
and to the effect in question – apprized of the meaning
of the several words by which it stands expressed of which it is composed, the words
cut and cutting among the rest. But when for the
purpose of sitting in judgment on an accusation charging
a man with having committed this forbidden act of this
description, a man of a class superior superior to the bulk of the community in point respect of
condition of life and the portion of knowledge naturally
attached to it, and on account of such presumed superiority
selected, is placed in the situation of a Judge, then
it is that because he is not not being a professionally
bred lawyer Judge, he is regarded by those who are professionally
bred judges, as a man incapable of understanding
and not fit to be trusted with pronouncing what it
is that cutting is the words cut and cutting mean. That the individual accused has
been guilty of offending against this law by which on pain
of death the act of cutting is when accompanied with the
evil intentions in question made a capital offence is what
they are indeed permitted to decide: but the act of word cutting being
one of the number of the words employed in the law, and the question
concerning the import of it being accordingly a question
of law, and professionally bred lawyers the only persons capable qualified
of understanding to decide on questions of law, and the Jurymen none of them
professionally bred lawyers thence it is that their having pronounced
the accused guilty of the act of cutting accompanied with
the evil intentions in question is not a sufficient warrant for decreeing him guilty.
Identifier: | JB/091/284/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1808-01-26 |
7 continued, 8 |
||
091 |
scotch reform |
||
284 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e19 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
29280 |
|||