JB/117/285/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/117/285/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/117/285/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/117/285/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>18 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi>. 1811<lb/>
<!-- in pencil --><head>18 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi>. 1811<lb/>J.B. to Treasury</head> <p>18<lb/><note>Letter 11</note><lb/>(2)</p> <!-- marginal summary in pencil --> ,p><note>26<lb/>So in the <del>h</del> being<lb/>assured J.B. accepts<lb/>it, but only because<lb/>otherwise he would<lb/>get nothing</note></p> <p>This, Sir, is clearly in every other particular than<lb/> the antecedent fixation of the day and the <add>set</add> responsibility<lb/>of the form <add>subjection to the law</add> (I mean in the <sic>burthensome</sic> sense of the<lb/>word responsibility) does the appellation <add>do the characters</add> of Bankruptcy<lb/>belong to the transaction, that time and<lb/>for no other reason than that the  <add>any</add> debtors are within<lb/>the <hi rend="underline">rules</hi> &#x2014; <gap/> in the period, <add>and that not promised</add> is held out to <del>h</del><lb/>use as the composition the utmost composition, that<lb/>
<head>J.B. to Treasury</head> <note>Letter 11</note></p>
I am allowed so much as to think of.</p> <p>Well, Sir, <gap/> in the period I will accept, if<lb/><del>it be impossible</del> no more will be paid send only if<lb/>no more will be paid, and because no more will be<lb/>paid and because half a loaf is better than no<lb/>bread: but I do not accept it, but for these reasons<lb/>and declaring these to be my reasons, and because<lb/>it has <del>ben</del> been my misfortune to have for my<lb/>debtors a firm when shop is within <gap/> <add>of the Kings Bench</add>,<!-- brackets in pencil --> [and whose<lb/>seat is above the law] and to whom it is matter<lb/>
 
of pride and <add>as well as</add> safety to be above the rules of <add>good</add> <del>Common</del><lb/><add>faith and honesty</add> as well as those of law.</p>
<p>This, Sir, is clearly in every other particular than<lb/>  
the contendent fixation of the day and the <add>set</add> responsibility<lb/>
of the form <add>subjection to the law</add> (I mean to the burthensome sense of the<lb/>
word responsibility) does the appellation <add>do the characters</add> of Bankruptcy<lb/>
belong to the transaction, that time and<lb/>
for no other reason than that the  <add>ins</add> debl<gap/> <gap/> within<lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">rules</hi> - <gap/> on the period, <add>and that not promises</add> os held out to <del><gap/></del><lb/>
use as the composition <gap/> utmost case position, that<lb/>
I am allured so much as to think of.</p>
 
<p>Well, Sir, <gap/> in the <gap/>d I will accept, if<lb/>
<del>it be impossible</del>us more will be paid send only if<lb/>
no more will be paid, and because no more will be<lb/>
paid and because half a loaf is better than no<lb/>
bread: but I do not accept it, but for these reasons<lb/>
and declaring these to be my reasons, and because<lb/>
it has <del>ben</del> been my misfortune to have for my<lb/>
debtors a form when shop is within <gap/><add>of the Kings B<gap/></add>, and whose<lb/>
seat is above the law and to where it is matter<lb/>
of pride and <add>as well as</add> safety to be above the rules of <add>good</add> <del><gap/></del><lb/>
<add>faith and honesty</add> as well as those of law.</p><pb/>





Revision as of 12:51, 22 March 2023

Click Here To Edit

18 Jany. 1811
J.B. to Treasury

18
Letter 11
(2)

,p>26
So in the h being
assured J.B. accepts
it, but only because
otherwise he would
get nothing

This, Sir, is clearly in every other particular than
the antecedent fixation of the day and the set responsibility
of the form subjection to the law (I mean in the burthensome sense of the
word responsibility) does the appellation do the characters of Bankruptcy
belong to the transaction, that time and
for no other reason than that the any debtors are within
the rules in the period, and that not promised is held out to h
use as the composition the utmost composition, that
I am allowed so much as to think of.

Well, Sir, in the period I will accept, if
it be impossible no more will be paid send only if
no more will be paid, and because no more will be
paid and because half a loaf is better than no
bread: but I do not accept it, but for these reasons
and declaring these to be my reasons, and because
it has ben been my misfortune to have for my
debtors a firm when shop is within of the Kings Bench, [and whose
seat is above the law] and to whom it is matter
of pride and as well as safety to be above the rules of good Common
faith and honesty as well as those of law.




Identifier: | JB/117/285/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

1801-01-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

26

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

285

Info in main headings field

jb to treasury

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / d18

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter 2100, vol. 8

ID Number

38902

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in