JB/034/121/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/034/121/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/121/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/121/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823. August 25<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code</head></p>
 
<p><unclear>Give</unclear> here for <gap/> or <gap/></p>
<p><del>To</del> Under this system, with what prospect of success could<lb/>
a Judge pronounce <del>a judgm</del> a sentence or a conviction which<lb/>
in his own eyes were unjust?  Altogether unavailing would<lb/>
any such act be in opposition than that of its passing without<lb/>
opposition <add>through</add> the censorship of the Quasi Jury, and <del>after</del><lb/>
moreover <del>receiving and</del> finding <add>a congeniality of</add> conjunct guilt in the Appellate<lb/>
Judicatory.</p>
<p>Meantime the act being <del><gap/></del> in the eyes even of the Agent<lb/>
itself flagrantly <add>palpably</add> unjust, is it possible <add>can it in the nature of things</add> that it should <unclear>wear</unclear><lb/>
a more favorable aspect <del>not only</del> in the eyes <add>not only</add> of <del><gap/></del> observers<lb/>
altogether impartial, but of persons <unclear>leagued</unclear> <add>men <gap/></add> by a<lb/>
community of interest self-regarding and sympathetic<lb/>
with the supposed objects of the intended <add><unclear>undiluted</unclear></add> injury?</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 03:55, 6 April 2023

Click Here To Edit

1823. August 25
Constitutional Code

Give here for or

To Under this system, with what prospect of success could
a Judge pronounce a judgm a sentence or a conviction which
in his own eyes were unjust? Altogether unavailing would
any such act be in opposition than that of its passing without
opposition through the censorship of the Quasi Jury, and after
moreover receiving and finding a congeniality of conjunct guilt in the Appellate
Judicatory.

Meantime the act being in the eyes even of the Agent
itself flagrantly palpably unjust, is it possible can it in the nature of things that it should wear
a more favorable aspect not only in the eyes not only of observers
altogether impartial, but of persons leagued men by a
community of interest self-regarding and sympathetic
with the supposed objects of the intended undiluted injury?



Identifier: | JB/034/121/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-08-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 25 - or 28

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

121

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / d13

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10395

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in