JB/118/308/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/118/308/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/308/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/308/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->3 March 1812<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Panopticon – Defence against Holfords Objections</head></p>
 
<p><!-- pencil -->Defence of the Panopticon Penitentiary System<lb/>
 
against the objections brought forward against it<lb/>
 
by the <add>House of Commons</add> Committee on Penitentiary Houses 31 May 1811</p>
<p>The following are the heads to which the objections seem<lb/>
referable <del>this <gap/></del> <add>to</add> one <del>of</del> or other of which all the<lb/>
objections <del>seem</del> <add>will</add> it is supposed be found referable – viz.</p>
<p>1.  "Security" <del>for the</del> (says the Report) "for the goodness of the<lb/>
"provisions and necessaries <del>sa</del> .... for the use of the prisoners."</p>
<p>2.  Security against the introduction of any improper degree of luxury into<lb/>
the prison with a view to his own profits.<lb/>
Under this head <add>says</add> the objection <del><gap/></del> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Benthams Contract<lb/>
contains no provision upon these points.</p>
<p>2.  In this objection an assumption is involved that specific<lb/>
articles wearing <add>purporting</add> on the face of them <add>to</add> the appearance<lb/>
of a specific security for this point of good management, are<lb/>
to such a degree necessary, or at least useful, that the <gap/><lb/>
of them is an imperfection in the system.</p>
<p>The answer to this is<lb/>
1.  That from any such articles <add>in any shape is likely to</add> no good <del>came</del> arise.<lb/>
2.  On the contrary that mischief is more probable.</p>
<p>By <hi rend="underline">goodness</hi> is <add>must here be</add> meant, if any determinate meaning<lb/>
be given to it <add>which is at one determinate and proper</add> the quality of not being prejudicial to health.<lb/>
But in this head it is submitted by that article in the case<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> by which the Contractor is made to <gap/> a large <gap/><lb/>
for every one that does, added to the circumstances of the loss<lb/>
he cannot but sustain in respect of capacity for profitable<lb/>
labour by every difference in point of health, and the unexampled<lb/>
facility of complaint afforded by the Panopticon plan,<lb/>
the most efficient security<lb/>
is given that<lb/>
the nature of things<lb/>
admitts of for this<lb/>
point of good management.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 03:50, 4 May 2023

Click Here To Edit

3 March 1812
Panopticon – Defence against Holfords Objections

Defence of the Panopticon Penitentiary System
against the objections brought forward against it
by the House of Commons Committee on Penitentiary Houses 31 May 1811

The following are the heads to which the objections seem
referable this to one of or other of which all the
objections seem will it is supposed be found referable – viz.

1. "Security" for the (says the Report) "for the goodness of the
"provisions and necessaries sa .... for the use of the prisoners."

2. Security against the introduction of any improper degree of luxury into
the prison with a view to his own profits.
Under this head says the objection Mr Benthams Contract
contains no provision upon these points.

2. In this objection an assumption is involved that specific
articles wearing purporting on the face of them to the appearance
of a specific security for this point of good management, are
to such a degree necessary, or at least useful, that the
of them is an imperfection in the system.

The answer to this is
1. That from any such articles in any shape is likely to no good came arise.
2. On the contrary that mischief is more probable.

By goodness is must here be meant, if any determinate meaning
be given to it which is at one determinate and proper the quality of not being prejudicial to health.
But in this head it is submitted by that article in the case
by which the Contractor is made to a large
for every one that does, added to the circumstances of the loss
he cannot but sustain in respect of capacity for profitable
labour by every difference in point of health, and the unexampled
facility of complaint afforded by the Panopticon plan,
the most efficient security
is given that
the nature of things
admitts of for this
point of good management.


Identifier: | JB/118/308/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

1812-03-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

308

Info in main headings field

panopticon defence against holford's objections

Image

001

Titles

defence of the panopticon penitentiary system against the objections brought forward against it by the house of commons committee upon penitentiary houses 31 may 1811

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

john dickinson & c<…> 1809

Marginals

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1809

Notes public

ID Number

39362

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in