★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/400/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/118/400/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->26 April 1809<lb/> | |||
' | <!-- pencil --><head>Press</head></p> | ||
<p>Meantime a <del>crime</del> circumstance by which the <gap/><lb/> | |||
and explanations given by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Attorney General and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/> | |||
Marryat are themselves in a considerable degree explained<lb/> | |||
and their importance at the same time in a considerable<lb/> | |||
degree reduced is the <del>actual state of the</del> more compleat<lb/> | |||
view given of the practice <del>of</del> in this head by the admissions<lb/> | |||
expressed and implied, contained in the Lord Chief Baron's<lb/> | |||
defence of it – as above-mentioned. <del>The</del> Of the complaint<lb/> | |||
as contained in the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> & 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> of those charges of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Whitbread<lb/> | |||
the sum and substance is – that in general Juries in<lb/> | |||
Crown causes are in the Exchequer at least, reduced to a<lb/> | |||
body differing very little from a <unclear>permanent</unclear> one: exposed<lb/> | |||
thereby to those corruptions which by the Statute have been<lb/> | |||
expressly stated as the experienced result of such a state<lb/> | |||
of things: and this is exactly that state of things which<lb/> | |||
the Lord Chief Baron defends, and of which by defending<lb/> | |||
he admitts the existence.</p> | |||
<p>In the single instance of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Marryat we are bound<lb/> | |||
to admitt, provisionally at least, and untill by cross examination<lb/> | |||
his evidence has been compleated <add>rendered compleat</add>, and in case of<lb/> | |||
any inaccuracy corrected – we are bound under that<lb/> | |||
restriction to admitt that the dismission in case of refractiveness,<lb/> | |||
did not take place.</p> | |||
<p>But on this subject two remarks present themselves.<lb/> | |||
one is – that though in the <add>instance of that</add> particular Jurymen no<lb/> | |||
such effect took place, it follows not but that in the instance<lb/> | |||
of any other number of Jurymen it may have taken place.</p> | |||
<p>The other is, that <del>from</del> supposing it <add>such</add> not to have been<lb/> | |||
in practice in any of the particular causes in which it <unclear>happened</unclear><lb/> | |||
<gap/> how to <gap/> in that character, it follows not but<lb/> | |||
<gap/> may <unclear>never</unclear> had <unclear>place</unclear> in an indefinite number of other causes.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
26 April 1809
Press
Meantime a crime circumstance by which the
and explanations given by Mr Attorney General and Mr
Marryat are themselves in a considerable degree explained
and their importance at the same time in a considerable
degree reduced is the actual state of the more compleat
view given of the practice of in this head by the admissions
expressed and implied, contained in the Lord Chief Baron's
defence of it – as above-mentioned. The Of the complaint
as contained in the 2d & 3d of those charges of Mr Whitbread
the sum and substance is – that in general Juries in
Crown causes are in the Exchequer at least, reduced to a
body differing very little from a permanent one: exposed
thereby to those corruptions which by the Statute have been
expressly stated as the experienced result of such a state
of things: and this is exactly that state of things which
the Lord Chief Baron defends, and of which by defending
he admitts the existence.
In the single instance of Mr Marryat we are bound
to admitt, provisionally at least, and untill by cross examination
his evidence has been compleated rendered compleat, and in case of
any inaccuracy corrected – we are bound under that
restriction to admitt that the dismission in case of refractiveness,
did not take place.
But on this subject two remarks present themselves.
one is – that though in the instance of that particular Jurymen no
such effect took place, it follows not but that in the instance
of any other number of Jurymen it may have taken place.
The other is, that from supposing it such not to have been
in practice in any of the particular causes in which it happened
how to in that character, it follows not but
may never had place in an indefinite number of other causes.
|
Identifier: | JB/118/400/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1812-09-13 |
|||
|
118 |
panopticon |
||
|
400 |
to ld sidmouth |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
a17 a6 / b9 / c6 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
th 1806 |
||
|
andre morellet |
|||
|
1806 |
|||
|
draft of enclosure to letter 2190, vol. 8 |
39454 |
||
