JB/106/321/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/321/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/106/321/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/321/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/321/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1821 Nov. 18<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Codification <del>Offer</del> Proposal.</head></p>
 
<p><del>Should it happen to this offer to find acceptance<lb/>
 
any where where, the acceptance it will rest with he<lb/>
 
&sect;. <gap/> Offer by the acceptance of the draught as above described<lb/>
authority by which the acceptance is given to supply<lb/>
<add>&sect;. <gap/> Observations on</add> the Author with such documents as shall be thought<lb/>
requisite.</del></p>
<p>22 Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>  What follows with it is supposed be superseded</p>
<p>A work of the sort in question not being <del><gap/></del> <add>within</add><lb/>
in the ordinary line of public business – <del>in</del> being<lb/>
in <del>a word</del> <add>fact</add> the first of the sort that was ever proposed<lb/>
or perhaps so much as conceived – <del>A</del> questions <add>to the following effect</add> present<lb/>
themselves <add><del>for without</del></add> as calling for answers.</p>
<p>1.  In favour of the probability of your executing<lb/>
a work of this sort with advantage to your employers<lb/>
what presumptions are you able to produce.  <add>What</add> In a<lb/>
word are your grounds of expectation <del><gap/></del> in regard to acceptance.<lb/>
Say 1. Grounds of expectation what?</p>
<p>2.  Why <del>thus <gap/> offer if the</del> not produce the<lb/>
work at once instead of <unclear>their</unclear> offering to produce it?<lb/>
Say – Why instead of the work <del><add><gap/></add> itself publish</del> in offer <del><gap/> by it?</del> <add>only?</add></p>
<p>3.  Why thus make offer of it instead of waiting<lb/>
for its being spoken?  <del>Why not wait for <gap/></del> <add>Say, Invitation why not <unclear>waited</unclear> for?</add></p>
<p>4.  Your notions of what is best in the field of Constitutional<lb/>
law being plainly repugnant to <del>whatsoever</del> <add>the arrangement<lb/>
which in</add> that part of the field of <add>which regards Constitutional</add> law are already established<lb/>
in several of the Nations to which your Proposal<lb/>
looks, what expectations can you entertain <del>that such<lb/>part of</del> of <del>thus giving</del> <add>any</add> acceptance at the hands of their<lb/>
respective rulers either for what regards that part<lb/>
of the field or for what regards the two other parts of<lb/>
the field namely the Penal and the Civil.</p>
<p><del>5. <gap/></del> What acceptance can you look for, from Governments<lb/>
established on principles of Constitutional law different<lb/>
from yours?  <del>What expectation of acceptance from different principles?</del><lb/>
Say, From different principles what expectation of acceptance?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 05:09, 6 June 2023

Click Here To Edit

1821 Nov. 18
Codification Offer Proposal.

Should it happen to this offer to find acceptance
any where where, the acceptance it will rest with he
§. Offer by the acceptance of the draught as above described
authority by which the acceptance is given to supply
§. Observations on the Author with such documents as shall be thought
requisite.

22 Novr What follows with it is supposed be superseded

A work of the sort in question not being within
in the ordinary line of public business – in being
in a word fact the first of the sort that was ever proposed
or perhaps so much as conceived – A questions to the following effect present
themselves for without as calling for answers.

1. In favour of the probability of your executing
a work of this sort with advantage to your employers
what presumptions are you able to produce. What In a
word are your grounds of expectation in regard to acceptance.
Say 1. Grounds of expectation what?

2. Why thus offer if the not produce the
work at once instead of their offering to produce it?
Say – Why instead of the work itself publish in offer by it? only?

3. Why thus make offer of it instead of waiting
for its being spoken? Why not wait for Say, Invitation why not waited for?

4. Your notions of what is best in the field of Constitutional
law being plainly repugnant to whatsoever the arrangement
which in
that part of the field of which regards Constitutional law are already established
in several of the Nations to which your Proposal
looks, what expectations can you entertain that such
part of
of thus giving any acceptance at the hands of their
respective rulers either for what regards that part
of the field or for what regards the two other parts of
the field namely the Penal and the Civil.

5. What acceptance can you look for, from Governments
established on principles of Constitutional law different
from yours? What expectation of acceptance from different principles?
Say, From different principles what expectation of acceptance?


Identifier: | JB/106/321/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1821-11-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

4 or 3 - 5 or 4

Box

106

Main Headings

codification proposal (codification offer)

Folio number

321

Info in main headings field

codification proposal

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

verso

Page Numbering

d4 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

"omitt?"

ID Number

349910009

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in