JB/081/013/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/013/003: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p><gap/> with the litigant parties &amp; the Court &#x2014; &#x2014; Their<lb/>disconnection <del>with</del> <add>from</add> the parties to <gap/> <gap/> &#x2014; that<lb/>from the court is no less necessary.  One ensures <del><gap/></del> impartiality &#x2014;<lb/> the other Independence &#x2014;</p> <p>So for this purpose as great &amp; constatnt <add>a</add> change of Jurors<lb/>as is practicable with convenience to the parties <gap/><lb/>in Juries &amp; with the <gap/> of the county is always<lb/>desirable &#x2014; &amp; the objects of the other enactments of the<lb?>3 Geo.2. which <gap/> the number to be retained<lb/>on the Panels seems to be to <gap/> it. &#x2014;</p> <p.2 The object in Exchequer seems to be to <sic>encrease</sic> these fundamental<lb/principles of Juries &#x2014; and C <gap/> <gap/> &#x2014;<lb/>a. The cointempt of the Law<lb/>b. The mischief <del>att</del> of the <gap/> contained in this<lb/>letter &#x2014; 1. The superceding Juries by a <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <gap/><lb/>in partiuclar cases<lb/>2 The applicability of the <gap/> to all<lb/>cases &#x2014;<lb/>3 The use which may be made of <gap/> Juries<lb/>c. The <gap/>ness of the advantage</p> <p>3 The extent of the practice in the Exchequer </del>&amp; the <gap/><lb?><hi rend="underline">of the <gap/> <gap/></hi></del><lb/>a. extent to which it has been <gap/> <gap/> &#x2014;<lb/>b. The <hi rend="underline"><gap/> <gap/></hi></p> <p> The applicability of the <gap/> <gap/> in<lb/>Jurymen &amp; their <gap/> to the other <gap/><lb/>&amp; the result &#x2014;</p> <p>XI The fruits &#x2014;</p>
<p>unconnected with the Litigant parties &amp; the Court &#x2014; &#x2014; Their<lb/>disconnection <del>with</del> <add>from</add> the parties is evidently necessary &#x2014; that<lb/>from the Court is no less necessary.  One ensures <del><gap/></del> impartiality &#x2014;<lb/> the other Independence &#x2014;</p> <p>So for this purpose as great &amp; constant <add>a</add> change of Jurors<lb/>as is practicable with convenience to the parties serving<lb/>in Juries &amp; with the state of the county is always<lb/>desirable &#x2014; &amp; the objects of the other enactments of the<lb/>3 Geo.2. which <gap/> the number to be retained<lb/>on the Panels seems to be to obtain it. &#x2014;</p> <p>2 The object in Exchequer seems to be to <sic>encrease</sic> these fundamental<lb/>principles of Juries &#x2014; and C. <unclear>Davies</unclear> letter &#x2014;<lb/>a. The contempt of the Law<lb/>b. The mischief <del>att</del> of the <gap/> contained in this<lb/>letter &#x2014; 1. The <sic>superceding</sic> Juries by a <del><gap/></del> Board &#x2014;<lb/>in particular cases<lb/>2 The applicability of the <gap/> to all<lb/>cases &#x2014;<lb/>3 The use which may be made of <gap/> Juries<lb/>c. The <gap/>ness of the advantage</p> <p>3 The extent of the practice in the Exchequer <del>&amp; the <gap/><lb/><hi rend="underline">of the <gap/> <gap/></hi></del><lb/>a. Extent to which it has been presently <gap/> &#x2014;<lb/>b. The <hi rend="underline"><gap/> <gap/></hi></p> <p> The applicability of the disposition <gap/> in<lb/>Jurymen &amp; their <gap/> to the other <gap/><lb/>&amp; the result &#x2014;</p> <p>XI The fruits &#x2014;</p>





Revision as of 16:35, 18 June 2023

Click Here To Edit

unconnected with the Litigant parties & the Court — — Their
disconnection with from the parties is evidently necessary — that
from the Court is no less necessary. One ensures impartiality —
the other Independence —

So for this purpose as great & constant a change of Jurors
as is practicable with convenience to the parties serving
in Juries & with the state of the county is always
desirable — & the objects of the other enactments of the
3 Geo.2. which the number to be retained
on the Panels seems to be to obtain it. —

2 The object in Exchequer seems to be to encrease these fundamental
principles of Juries — and C. Davies letter —
a. The contempt of the Law
b. The mischief att of the contained in this
letter — 1. The superceding Juries by a Board —
in particular cases
2 The applicability of the to all
cases —
3 The use which may be made of Juries
c. The ness of the advantage

3 The extent of the practice in the Exchequer & the
of the

a. Extent to which it has been presently
b. The

The applicability of the disposition in
Jurymen & their to the other
& the result —

XI The fruits —




Identifier: | JB/081/013/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1827-10-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

013

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

c brenchley 1808

Marginals

Paper Producer

earl of shelburne

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1808

Notes public

[[notes_public::"9 oct. 1827 is not this lord […?] unless determined by law a […?] many years ago (say 10 or 12) to jb qsp?" [note in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

25800

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in