★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/100/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/081/100/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829 March 23<lb/>Petition</head> <p>B 7 <del>6</del><lb/><note>Supplement</note><lb/>(7 <note> | |||
Petition</head>< | §.3 Suits in prudences</note></p> <p><note>11<lb/>Prevention of<lb/>disappointment<lb/>this the only<lb/>justification of<lb/>the decision in<lb/>evil cases.</note></p> <p>Prevention of disappointment — The <del>fo</del> more closely<lb/>the matter is considered, the more satisfactory will be a<lb/>man's conviction, that by this <del>short re</del> phrase short<lb/>as it is, is <del><gap/></del> excluded the only <!-- brackets in pencil -->[justifiable] reason why<lb/><del>to over</del> in relation to the matter of wealth and the other<lb/>objects of <del>the</del> general desire that which is regarded as<lb/>each mans <hi rend="underline">own</hi> should be secured to him, instead of <add>rather than</add><lb/>being <del>h</del> given to <del>any</del> this or that other man, or left to<lb/>be taken by any man so inclined.</p> <p> <note>13<lb/>This the object<lb/>of all arrangements<lb/>for the security<lb/>of property</note></p> <p> Well then <del>this is the object</del> of all the several arrangements<lb/>made for the security of property this is the<lb/>end in view: in all these cases <add>instances</add> it is the object — how<lb/> | ||
so ever indirectly and tortuously — through ever so or many turnings<lb/>and <gap/>, aimed at.</p> <p><note>14<lb/>This being admitted<lb/>why not in each<lb/>instance give the<lb/.Judge a direct power<lb/>of giving such decisions.</note></p> <p>This being admitted — why not, as here proposed,<lb/><sic>permitt</sic> <del>the Ju</del> in each instance the Judge, to <del>use</del> <gap/> his<lb/>nose at this object, in a direct and straight forward way<lb/>at once. In respect of <gap/> — of exclusion of delay,<lb/>the advantage (will it is assured <add>such the <gap/> is</add>) incontestable</p> <p>15<lb/>No evil to be<lb/>apprehended so great<lb/>as <hi rend="underline">under</hi> existing<lb/>system</note></p> <p>In respect of <gap/> of <sic>misdecision</sic> <add>for the <gap/></add> or any<lb/>evil greater than the existing system can any ground be assigned?</p><p>If any such then to <del>it must be a</del> the evil in question must<lb/><be an evil either of the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> order or of the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> order, as above<lb/>described <add>explained</add></p> <p>1. First then as to the ecil of the first order. This evil<lb/>consists in the painful sense of disappointment produced by<lb/>the <del><gap/></del> loss or non obtainment on the part of a demandant,<lb/>loss on the part of a defendant.</p> <p>Now under the existing System — under any existing<lb/>system, whatsoever the decision, evil in one or other of these shapes<lb/>can not but follow</p> | |||
<note>Supplement<lb/> | |||
§.3 Suits in prudences</note></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1829 March 23
Petition
B 7 6
Supplement
(7
§.3 Suits in prudences
11
Prevention of
disappointment
this the only
justification of
the decision in
evil cases.
Prevention of disappointment — The fo more closely
the matter is considered, the more satisfactory will be a
man's conviction, that by this short re phrase short
as it is, is excluded the only [justifiable] reason why
to over in relation to the matter of wealth and the other
objects of the general desire that which is regarded as
each mans own should be secured to him, instead of rather than
being h given to any this or that other man, or left to
be taken by any man so inclined.
13
This the object
of all arrangements
for the security
of property
Well then this is the object of all the several arrangements
made for the security of property this is the
end in view: in all these cases instances it is the object — how
so ever indirectly and tortuously — through ever so or many turnings
and , aimed at.
14
This being admitted
why not in each
instance give the<lb/.Judge a direct power
of giving such decisions.
This being admitted — why not, as here proposed,
permitt the Ju in each instance the Judge, to use his
nose at this object, in a direct and straight forward way
at once. In respect of — of exclusion of delay,
the advantage (will it is assured such the is) incontestable
15
No evil to be
apprehended so great
as under existing
system</note>
In respect of of misdecision for the or any
evil greater than the existing system can any ground be assigned?
If any such then to it must be a the evil in question must
<be an evil either of the 1st order or of the 2d order, as above
described explained
1. First then as to the ecil of the first order. This evil
consists in the painful sense of disappointment produced by
the loss or non obtainment on the part of a demandant,
loss on the part of a defendant.
Now under the existing System — under any existing
system, whatsoever the decision, evil in one or other of these shapes
can not but follow
|
Identifier: | JB/081/100/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-03-23 |
11-15 |
||
|
081 |
petition for justice |
||
|
100 |
petitions |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d7 / e7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
street & co |
||
|
antonio alcala galiano |
|||
|
25887 |
|||
