JB/081/107/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/107/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1829 March 23<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note>Supplement</note><lb/>13 <note>&sect; 3. Suits in pendency</note></p> <p><note>34<lb/>Mode of remuneration<lb/>essential condition that<lb/>it be no premium for<lb/>delay</note></p> <p>Now as to the mode of remuneration.  One essential condition is that<lb/.there shall be no premium for delay: in other words, paid by<lb/>a proportion to the length of the delay <gap/> not be cut of the<lb/><gap/> per cent the <gap/> would <del>be to <gap/></del> made can be the <gap/></p> <p>A term say ten years for example <gap/>: <gap/> day<lb/>that this offered to <del><gap/></del> any one of them: to cutting a <gap/><lb/><gap/> of the <gap/> act for 365.  The <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> this<lb/>purpose <gap/> <gap/> with <gap/> to each class <add>the suits</add> to which<lb/><add>would be <gap/> to each individual, and these <gap/> <gap/ <gap/></add> by <gap/>.  By day <gap/> in the shape <gap/> employ<lb/>in all shapes would be at <gap/>: by chance <del><gap/></del> evil in either<lb/>these shapes <gap/> excluded.</p> <p>Now as to the power out of which the remuneration should <add>shall</add><lb/>come.  Suppose no blame to have place on either side &#x2014; no evil consciousness &#x2014; <add>commonly <gap/> <foreign>mala fides</foreign></add> <del>in <gap/></del> non <gap/> in every shape, in that case<lb/><add>it <add>the pure claim</add> will intently be that of the <gap/>: for in the commissions above<lb/><gap/> to, so it is</p> <p>But in case of such facts let it be the purse of the <add>purse of<lb/>all parties who in <gap/> of the</add> party in whom the blame: even in <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> themselves</del><lb?>then less would be the <sic>burthen</sic> than under the existing system<lb/>A thousand pound placed not in the public purse would it not then<lb/>be <del><gap/></del> for the blameable party a more <gap/> arrangement,<lb/>than £2,000 scattered broadcast <del><gap/></del> among the fraternity<lb/>of learned gentlemen and learned Lords?</p> <p>In <gap/> may have <gap/> for example. The case where<lb/>a man has got other peoples money in his hands, <del>and</del> being himself<lb/>to have no right to <gap/> it the quality of it being such<lb?>that upon calculation net profit will be the result of the <gap/><lb/>after payment of costs during the <gap/> of the <gap/>  Would<lb/>not this be a fit case for <gap/> of the <gap/> profit thus<lb>obtained or thought to be obtained  <del>where it</del> Were the quality <gap/><lb/>was the whole could any <gap/> on the ground of utility <gap/><lb/>be made to it?  Much less could then if <add>to</add. no more than a <gap/> it was proposed<lb/><add>it</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> it should <gap/> here<lb/>would receive a premium<lb?>for <gap/> as<lb/>to the remainder.</p>
<head>1829 March 23<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note>Supplement</note><lb/>13 <note>&sect; 3. Suits in pendency</note></p> <p><note>34<lb/>Mode of remuneration<lb/>essential condition that<lb/>it be no premium for<lb/>delay</note></p> <p>Now as to the mode of remuneration.  One essential condition is that<lb/>there shall be no premium for delay: in other words, paid by<lb/>a proportion to the length of the delay and not be cut of the<lb/><gap/> per cent the fee would <del>be to <gap/></del> in such case be the <gap/></p> <p>A term say ten years for example <gap/>: <gap/> day<lb/>that this offered to <del><gap/></del> any one of them: to cutting a <gap/><lb/><gap/> of the <gap/> act for 365.  The <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> this<lb/>purpose <gap/> <gap/> with <gap/> to each class <add>the suits</add> to which<lb/><add>would be <gap/> to each individual, and these <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></add><lb/>by <gap/>.  By day <gap/> in all shapes will employ<lb/>in all shapes would be at work: by Chance <del><gap/></del> evil in either<lb/>these shapes <gap/> <gap/> excluded.</p> <p>Now as to the power out of which the remuneration should <add>shall</add><lb/>come.  Suppose no blame to have place on either side &#x2014; no evil consciousness &#x2014; <add>commonly <gap/> <foreign>mala fides</foreign></add> <del>in <gap/></del> non <gap/> in any shape, in that case<lb/><add>it <add>the <unclear>pure</unclear> claim</add> will intently be that of the public: for in the commissions above<lb/>alluded to, so it is</p> <p>But in case of such facts let it be the purse of the <add>purses of<lb/>all parties who are <gap/> of the</add> party in whom the blame: even in <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> themselves</del><lb/>then left would be the <sic>burthen</sic> than under the existing system<lb/>A thousand pound placed not in the public purse would it not then<lb/>be <del><gap/></del> for the blameable party a more eligible arrangement,<lb/>than £2,000 scattered broadcast <del><gap/></del> among the fraternity<lb/>of learned Gentlemen and learned Lords?</p> <p>One case may have <gap/> for example. The case where<lb/>a man has got other peoples money in his hands, <del>and</del> being himself<lb/>to have no right to relieve it: the quality of it being such<lb/>that upon calculation net profit will be the result of the <gap/><lb/>after payment of costs during the <gap/> of the <gap/>  Would<lb/>not this be a fit case for <gap/> of the <gap/> profit thus<lb>obtained or might to be obtained  <del>Where it</del> Were the quality <gap/><lb/>was the whole could any <gap/> on the ground of utility one <gap/><lb/>be made to it?  Much less could there if <add>to</add> no more than a <gap/> it was proposed<lb/><add>it</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> it should extend: here<lb/>would remain a premium<lb/>for <gap/> as<lb/>to the remainder.</p>





Revision as of 16:58, 2 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829 March 23
Petitions

Supplement
13 § 3. Suits in pendency

34
Mode of remuneration
essential condition that
it be no premium for
delay

Now as to the mode of remuneration. One essential condition is that
there shall be no premium for delay: in other words, paid by
a proportion to the length of the delay and not be cut of the
per cent the fee would be to in such case be the

A term say ten years for example : day
that this offered to any one of them: to cutting a
of the act for 365. The this
purpose with to each class the suits to which
would be to each individual, and these
by . By day in all shapes will employ
in all shapes would be at work: by Chance evil in either
these shapes excluded.

Now as to the power out of which the remuneration should shall
come. Suppose no blame to have place on either side — no evil consciousness — commonly mala fides in non in any shape, in that case
it <add>the pure claim will intently be that of the public: for in the commissions above
alluded to, so it is

But in case of such facts let it be the purse of the purses of
all parties who are of the
party in whom the blame: even in themselves
then left would be the burthen than under the existing system
A thousand pound placed not in the public purse would it not then
be for the blameable party a more eligible arrangement,
than £2,000 scattered broadcast among the fraternity
of learned Gentlemen and learned Lords?

One case may have for example. The case where
a man has got other peoples money in his hands, and being himself
to have no right to relieve it: the quality of it being such
that upon calculation net profit will be the result of the
after payment of costs during the of the Would
not this be a fit case for of the profit thus<lb>obtained or might to be obtained Where it Were the quality
was the whole could any on the ground of utility one
be made to it? Much less could there if to no more than a it was proposed
it
it should extend: here
would remain a premium
for as
to the remainder.




Identifier: | JB/081/107/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-03-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

34

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

107

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e13

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1828

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

25894

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in