JB/013/156/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/013/156/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/013/156/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/013/156/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/013/156/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1821 Feb. 10<lb/>
1821 Feb. 10
<!-- pencil --><head>Mora's Imprisonment</head></p>
Moras Imprisonment
<p>( ) [the Judge was forced to state to Mora the grounds of the<lb/>
 
accusation] Very good <add>Good indeed</add>. Forced by what? By the <del><gap/></del> terms of the<lb/>
6
law. Quite as it should be this: so far, so good. The <unclear>aim</unclear><lb/>
6
of the laws had for their object and their effect the imposing of<lb/>
 
the obligation in question upon the Judge: the Judge on his<lb/>
( ) [the Judge was forced to state to Mora the grounds of the
part did his part and fulfilled the obligation so imposed upon<lb/>
accusation] Very good Good indeed. Forced by what? By the <gap/> terms of the
him by the law.</p>
law. Quite as it should be this: so far, so good. The <gap/>
<p>( ) [But there is a distinction to be made] quoth the party accused:<lb/>
of the law send for this object and their effect the imposing of
If this was all the answer given, it applied not to the<lb/>
the obligation in question upon the Judge: the Judge on his
question, it was tantamount to silence, it was neither Guilty nor<lb/>
part did his part and fulfilled the obligation so imposed upon
not Guilty, it was tantamount to silence and thereby to confession<lb/>
him by the law.
unless some other cause for silence can be shown for silence.<lb/>
 
But the charge what did that amount to? taking <del>for <gap/></del> the replacing<lb/>
( ) [But there is a distinction to be made] quoth the party accused:
<del>of an interest much <gap/> where</del> upon the <unclear>mark</unclear> of a <unclear>House</unclear><lb/>
If this was all the answer given, it applied not to the
to replace in an apartment of his house a <gap/> that<lb/>
question. it was tantamount to silence, it was neither Guilty nor
had been used to <del>compose</del> <add>constitute</add> part of the furniture, what crime<lb/>
not Guilty, it was tantamount to silence and thereby to indifference
can there be in that?  <add>In this its same charge</add> Nothing can I perceive <del>in</del> that upon the<lb/>
unless some other cause for silence can be shown for silence.
face of it wears the character of an offence.  <del>No offence<lb/>
But the charge what did that amount to?  
can there have been</del>  What in <unclear>penal</unclear> terms was to <del>have<lb/>
 
been</del> be stated as having been charged upon the defendant<lb/>
 
as a breach – not of <del>the</del> any pre-existing law, but <del>upon</del> of<lb/>
 
the recently exacted law in question.  But of this law<lb/>
neither in power nor in purport is any designation <del>given</del><lb/>
to be found here.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:11, 8 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

1821 Feb. 10
Mora's Imprisonment

( ) [the Judge was forced to state to Mora the grounds of the
accusation] Very good Good indeed. Forced by what? By the terms of the
law. Quite as it should be this: so far, so good. The aim
of the laws had for their object and their effect the imposing of
the obligation in question upon the Judge: the Judge on his
part did his part and fulfilled the obligation so imposed upon
him by the law.

( ) [But there is a distinction to be made] quoth the party accused:
If this was all the answer given, it applied not to the
question, it was tantamount to silence, it was neither Guilty nor
not Guilty, it was tantamount to silence and thereby to confession
unless some other cause for silence can be shown for silence.
But the charge what did that amount to? taking for the replacing
of an interest much where upon the mark of a House
to replace in an apartment of his house a that
had been used to compose constitute part of the furniture, what crime
can there be in that? In this its same charge Nothing can I perceive in that upon the
face of it wears the character of an offence. No offence
can there have been
What in penal terms was to have
been
be stated as having been charged upon the defendant
as a breach – not of the any pre-existing law, but upon of
the recently exacted law in question. But of this law
neither in power nor in purport is any designation given
to be found here.


Identifier: | JB/013/156/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 13.

Date_1

1821-02-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

013

Main Headings

Folio number

156

Info in main headings field

mora's imprisonment

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

4605

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in